Proclamation The Lockers of Moldavia and Wallachia! / General Feldmareşal Witgenstein. - Chişinău: s.n., 1828. - 1 f. ; 1 ° (35.5 cm)
Romanian text in Cyrillic characters - This tab comes from the ...donation of George Sion. A cardboard cover was added to the flywheel sheets. Following the Russo-Turkish War between 1806-1812 Bessarabia was annexed to the Russian Gorge.In this Proclamation Peter KhristianovichWittgenstein, a general who noted both during the Napoleonic wars and during the Russo-Turkish wars, addresses the inhabitants of Moldavia and those of Valahia asking them to help and make available to the Russian soldiers the ones needed to complete the new war with the Turks (1828-1829). The basis of action of General Wittgenstein’s armies was Bessarabia. He declares that he entered the country (Moldova and Valahia) with the oastea entrusted to him by the country Nicholas I in order to carry the war against the Turks “to fulfill the trampled foetuses, and to laugh in the rotten, the foggers that before everyone or the imprisoned.” It is addressed to the Romanians as allies, recognized friends of Russia: receive the brave rossieni hostage as pre frailor i and as your natural defenders “(...)” show noao evidence of your long-known Czech love. " He also states that “the war to break away from His Empress Enlargement after the undefended need will not miss you the plea of all these abilities, what a breast united with peace,” but “by wandering for the benefit of your homeland, you will see our newscast entitled to the protection and mercy of the Great Monarch.” After the formulation of his doleanness by exposing the purpose of his mission, the request to help the army, the benefits that the two countries will have from the help provided to the Russian soldiers, Marshal Wittgenstein concludes by declaring himself the “greatest hermitage” of the Russians.
Proclamaţie Lăcuitorilor Moldaviei şi Valahiei! / General Feldmareşal Witgenstein. - Chişinău : s.n., 1828. - 1 f. ; 1° (35,5 cm.)
Text în limba română cu caractere chirilice. - Această filă provine din donaţia lui George Sion. Foii volante i s-a adăugat o copertă de carton. În urma războiului ruso-turc dintre anii 1806-1812 Basarabia a fost anexată Împeriului Rus.În această Proclamaţie Peter KhristianovichWittgenstein, general ce s-a remarcat atât în timpul războaielor napoleoniene cât şi în timpul războaielor ruso-turceşti, se adresează locuitorilor Moldovei şi celor din Valahia cerându-le să ajute şi să pună la dispoziţia ostaşilor ruşi cele necesare pentru a putea duce la bun sfârşit noul război cu turcii (1828-1829). Baza de acţiune a armatelor generalului Wittgenstein a fost Basarabia. Acesta declară că a intrat în ţară (Moldova şi Valahia) cu oastea încredinţată lui de ţarul Nicolae I pentru a purta războiul contra turcilor „ca să se împlinească făgăduinţele ceale călcate, şi ca să se râdice întru puteare tractaturile, ceale ce înaintea a toată lumea sau închiiat”. Se adresează românilor ca unor aliaţi, prieteni recunoscuţi ai Rusiei: primiţi pre vitejii ostaşi rossieneşti ca pre fraţii şi ca pre apărătorii voştri cei fireşti” (...) „arătaţi noao dovezi a dragostei voastre cein de demult cunoscute”. Şi mai afirmă că „războiul ce să deşchide de cătră Împărăteasca Sa Mărire după neapărata nevoie nu vă va lipsi pre voi de toate aceale îndemânări, ce sânt unite cu pacea”, ci „răvnind folosului patriei voastre, voi veţi căştiga noao dreptăţi spre ocrotirea şi mila a Prea Puternicului Monarh”. După formularea doleanţei sale prin expunerea scopului misiunii sale, cererii de ajutorare a armatei, a beneficiilor pe care cele două ţări le vor avea în urma ajutorului oferit ostaşilor ruşi, mareşalul Wittgenstein încheie declarându-se „cel mai mare povăţuitor al armiei” ruseşti.
Proclamaţie Lăcuitorilor Moldaviei şi Valahiei! / General Feldmareşal Witgenstein. - Chişinău : s.n., 1828. - 1 f. ; 1° (35,5 cm.)
Text în limba română cu caractere chirilice. - Această filă provine din donaţia lui George Sion. Foii volante i s-a adăugat o copertă de carton. În urma războiului ruso-turc dintre anii 1806-1812 Basarabia a fost anexată Împeriului Rus.În această Proclamaţie Peter KhristianovichWittgenstein, general ce s-a remarcat atât în timpul războaielor napoleoniene cât şi în timpul războaielor ruso-turceşti, se adresează locuitorilor Moldovei şi celor din Valahia cerându-le să ajute şi să pună la dispoziţia ostaşilor ruşi cele necesare pentru a putea duce la bun sfârşit noul război cu turcii (1828-1829). Baza de acţiune a armatelor generalului Wittgenstein a fost Basarabia. Acesta declară că a intrat în ţară (Moldova şi Valahia) cu oastea încredinţată lui de ţarul Nicolae I pentru a purta războiul contra turcilor „ca să se împlinească făgăduinţele ceale călcate, şi ca să se râdice întru puteare tractaturile, ceale ce înaintea a toată lumea sau închiiat”. Se adresează românilor ca unor aliaţi, prieteni recunoscuţi ai Rusiei: primiţi pre vitejii ostaşi rossieneşti ca pre fraţii şi ca pre apărătorii voştri cei fireşti” (...) „arătaţi noao dovezi a dragostei voastre cein de demult cunoscute”. Şi mai afirmă că „războiul ce să deşchide de cătră Împărăteasca Sa Mărire după neapărata nevoie nu vă va lipsi pre voi de toate aceale îndemânări, ce sânt unite cu pacea”, ci „răvnind folosului patriei voastre, voi veţi căştiga noao dreptăţi spre ocrotirea şi mila a Prea Puternicului Monarh”. După formularea doleanţei sale prin expunerea scopului misiunii sale, cererii de ajutorare a armatei, a beneficiilor pe care cele două ţări le vor avea în urma ajutorului oferit ostaşilor ruşi, mareşalul Wittgenstein încheie declarându-se „cel mai mare povăţuitor al armiei” ruseşti.
Galvanized Brantley, Michael K
2020, 20200501, 2020-05-01
eBook
Every Civil War veteran had a story to tell. But few stories top the one lived by Wright Stephen Batchelor. Like most North Carolina farmers, Batchelor eschewed slaveholding. He also opposed ...secession and war, yet he fought on both sides of the conflict. During his time in each uniform, Batchelor barely avoided death at the Battle of Gettysburg, was captured twice, and survived one of the war's most infamous prisoner-of-war camps. He escaped and, after walking hundreds of miles, rejoined his comrades at Petersburg, Virginia, just as the Union siege there began. Once the war ended, Batchelor returned on foot to his farm, where he took part in local politics, supported rights for freedmen, and was fatally involved in a bizarre hometown murder. Michael K. Brantley's story of his great-great-grandfather's odyssey blends memory and Civil War history to look at how the complexities of loyalty and personal belief governed one man's actions-and still influence the ways Americans think about the conflict today.
En el presente estudio ofrecemos líneas que fundamentarán la edición crítica de Sociedades americanas en 1828, la obra maestra inconclusa del pensador radical latinoamericano Simón Rodríguez. Para ...ello reconstruimos el plan general diseñado por Rodríguez para la edición de Sociedades americanas en 1828 y caracterizamos los diferentes fragmentos que Rodríguez alcanzó a publicar de esta obra y su lugar en el proyecto general.
Sohrab Sepehri and William Wordsworth’s poems, have repeatedly been compared as they both reflect Pantheism and Emerson’s Over-Soul, yet they have never been studied in the light of Ibn Arabi’s ...Philosophy. The theory of Constant Immanence or renewal of creation expressed by Ibn Arabi can be regarded as an umbrella term to read the selected poems of Sepehri and Wordsworth and detect the similarities between these poets of two distinct milieu. Ibn Arabi’s innovative ideas of constantly renewing creation of the cosmos, the relationship between Man and Nature, Perfect Man and the love of religion have been depicted impressively centuries later in Sepehri’s and Wordsworth’s works. There is a wide tendency to compare the poems of these two poets of different milieu due to their special outlook to nature and their very individualistic worlds and their wide acceptance by both elite and common readers of poetry.
In June 1887, a man known as General Husayn, a manumitted slave turned dignitary in the Ottoman province of Tunis, passed away in Florence after a life crossing empires. As a youth, Husayn was ...brought from Circassia to Turkey, where he was sold as a slave. In Tunis, he ascended to the rank of general before French conquest forced his exile to the northern shores of the Mediterranean. His death was followed by wrangling over his estate that spanned a surprising array of actors: Ottoman Sultan Abdülhamid II and his viziers; the Tunisian, French, and Italian governments; and representatives of Muslim and Jewish diasporic communities. A Slave Between Empires investigates Husayn's transimperial life and the posthumous battle over his fortune to recover the transnational dimensions of North African history. M'hamed Oualdi places Husayn within the international context of the struggle between Ottoman and French forces for control of the Mediterranean amid social and intellectual ferment that crossed empires. Oualdi considers this part of the world not as a colonial borderland but as a central space where overlapping imperial ambitions transformed dynamic societies. He explores how the transition between Ottoman rule and European colonial domination was felt in the daily lives of North African Muslims, Christians, and Jews and how North Africans conceived of and acted upon this shift. Drawing on a wide range of Arabic, French, Italian, and English sources,A Slave Between Empires is a groundbreaking transimperial microhistory that demands a major analytical shift in the conceptualization of North African history.
Traditionally, a profit a prendre (hereinafter referred to as a 'profit') is the 'right to take something off the land of another person' and 'to take some profit of the soil, or a portion of the ...soil itself ... for the use of the owner of the right'. The kind of commodities which were conventionally the subject matter of a profit included wild animals, vegetation and any part of the soil such as stone, sand and minerals. Like an easement, a profit was and remains a proprietary interest in land which can be assigned, but generally unlike an easement it can exist 'in gross', that is unconnected to a specified dominant tenement. A profit was and remains exercisable in common with one or more persons or it may be exclusive or a right in severalty.
Traditionally, a profit a prendre (hereinafter referred to as a 'profit') is the 'right to take something off the land of another person' and 'to take some profit of the soil, or a portion of the ...soil itself ... for the use of the owner of the right'. The kind of commodities which were conventionally the subject matter of a profit included wild animals, vegetation and any part of the soil such as stone, sand and minerals. Like an easement, a profit was and remains a proprietary interest in land which can be assigned, but generally unlike an easement it can exist 'in gross', that is unconnected to a specified dominant tenement. A profit was and remains exercisable in common with one or more persons or it may be exclusive or a right in severalty.
Traditionally, a profit a prendre (hereinafter referred to as a 'profit') is the 'right to take something off the land of another person' and 'to take some profit of the soil, or a portion of the ...soil itself... for the use of the owner of the right'. The kind of commodities which were conventionally the subject matter of a profit included wild animals, vegetation and any part of the soil such as stone, sand and minerals. Like an easement, a profit was and remains a proprietary interest in land which can be assigned, but generally unlike an easement it can exist 'in gross', that is unconnected to a specified dominant tenement. A profit was and remains exercisable in common with one or more persons or it may be exclusive or a right in severalty., Traditionally, a profit a prendre (hereinafter referred to as a 'profit') is the 'right to take something off the land of another person' and 'to take some profit of the soil, or a portion of the soil itself ... for the use of the owner of the right'. The kind of commodities which were conventionally the subject matter of a profit included wild animals, vegetation and any part of the soil such as stone, sand and minerals. Like an easement, a profit was and remains a proprietary interest in land which can be assigned, but generally unlike an easement it can exist 'in gross', that is unconnected to a specified dominant tenement. A profit was and remains exercisable in common with one or more persons or it may be exclusive or a right in severalty.
PDF
