(1) The human luteinizing hormone (LH)/chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) receptor (LHCGR) discriminates its two hormone ligands and differs from the murine receptor (Lhr) in amino acid residues ...potentially involved in qualitative discerning of LH and hCG. The latter gonadotropin is absent in rodents. The aim of the study is to identify LHCGR residues involved in hCG/LH discrimination. (2) Eight LHCGR cDNAs were developed, carrying "murinizing" mutations on aminoacidic residues assumed to interact specifically with LH, hCG, or both. HEK293 cells expressing a mutant or the wild type receptor were treated with LH or hCG and the kinetics of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (pERK1/2) activation was analyzed by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). (3) Mutations falling within the receptor leucine reach repeat 9 and 10 (LRR9 and LRR10; K225S +T226I and R247T), of the large extracellular binding domain, are linked to loss of hormone-specific induced cAMP increase, as well as hCG-specific pERK1/2 activation, leading to a Lhr-like modulation of the LHCGR-mediated intracellular signaling pattern. These results support the hypothesis that LHCGR LRR domain is the interaction site of the hormone β-L2 loop, which differs between LH and hCG, and might be fundamental for inducing gonadotropin-specific signals. (4) Taken together, these data identify LHCGR key residues likely evolved in the human to discriminate LH/hCG specific binding.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous mediators of signaling of hormones, neurotransmitters, and sensing. The old dogma is that a one ligand/one receptor complex constitutes the ...functional unit of GPCR signaling. However, there is mounting evidence that some GPCRs form dimers or oligomers during their biosynthesis, activation, inactivation, and/or internalization. This evidence has been obtained exclusively from cell culture experiments, and proof for the physiological significance of GPCR di/oligomerization in vivo is still missing. Using the mouse luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) as a model GPCR, we demonstrate that transgenic mice coexpressing binding-deficient and signaling-deficient forms of LHR can reestablish normal LH actions through intermolecular functional complementation of the mutant receptors in the absence of functional wild-type receptors. These results provide compelling in vivo evidence for the physiological relevance of intermolecular cooperation in GPCR signaling.
► We provide current understanding of structure/function of gonadotropin receptors. ► We summarize post-transcriptional regulation of LH receptor expression. ► We propose a new mechanism for LH ...receptor downregulation in the ovary.
Luteinizing hormone receptor and follicle stimulating hormone receptor play a crucial role in female and male reproduction. Significant new information has emerged about the structure, mechanism of activation, and regulation of expression of these receptors. Here we provide an overview of the current information on those aspects with an in-depth discussion of the recent developments in the post-transcriptional mechanism of LH receptor expression mediated by a specific LH receptor mRNA binding protein, designated as LRBP. LRBP was identified by electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay using cytosolic fractions from ovaries in the down regulated state. LRBP was purified, its binding site on LH receptor mRNA was identified and characterized. During ligand-induced down regulation, LRBP expression is increased through the cAMP/PKA and ERK signaling pathway, is translocated to translating ribosomes, binds LH receptor mRNA and forms an untranslatable ribonucleoprotein complex. This complex is then routed to the mRNA degradation machinery resulting in diminished levels of both LHR mRNA and cell surface expression of LH receptor. The studies leading to these conclusions are presented.
Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) play complementary roles in follicle development and ovulation via a complex interaction in the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary gland, ...reproductive organs, and oocytes. Impairment of the production or action of gonadotropins causes relative or absolute LH and FSH deficiency that compromises gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production, thereby reducing fertility. In women, LH and FSH deficiency is a spectrum of conditions with different functional or organic causes that are characterized by low or normal gonadotropin levels and low oestradiol levels. While the causes and effects of reduced LH and FSH production are very well known, the notion of reduced action has received less attention by researchers. Recent evidence shows that molecular characteristics, signalling as well as ageing, and some polymorphisms negatively affect gonadotropin action. These findings have important clinical implications, in particular for medically assisted reproduction in which diminished action determined by the afore-mentioned factors, combined with reduced endogenous gonadotropin production caused by GnRH analogue protocols, may lead to resistance to gonadotropins and, thus, to an unexpected hypo-response to ovarian stimulation. Indeed, the importance of LH and FSH action has been highlighted by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ICMART) in their definition of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism as gonadal failure associated with reduced gametogenesis and gonadal steroid production due to reduced gonadotropin production or action. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of determinants of reduced FSH and LH action that are associated with a reduced response to ovarian stimulation.
We encountered a 30-year-old woman with remarkably elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, as measured by electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA), and no specific symptoms. We performed the ...following investigations: dilution linearity test, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation test, immunoprecipitation test, protein G addition test, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The linearity of patient’s serum was similar to that of a standard LH preparation, and non-specific reactions were not observed. The recovery rate of LH shown by the PEG precipitation test, immunoprecipitation test, and protein G addition test was low. Moreover, an abnormal peak in HPLC was located at a slightly larger molecular weight position than that of IgG. These results showed the presence of macro-LH, LH, and anti-LH-IgG autoantibody complex and suggested that the clearance of LH from the blood was delayed due to IgG binding, and therefore, the LH value was falsely high. We should keep the possibility of macro-LH in mind in cases of unexpectedly high LH values.
Human luteinizing hormone (hLH) and chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) act on the same receptor (LHCGR) but it is not known whether they elicit the same cellular and molecular response. This study compares ...for the first time the activation of cell-signalling pathways and gene expression in response to hLH and hCG. Using recombinant hLH and recombinant hCG we evaluated the kinetics of cAMP production in COS-7 and hGL5 cells permanently expressing LHCGR (COS-7/LHCGR, hGL5/LHCGR), as well as cAMP, ERK1/2, AKT activation and progesterone production in primary human granulosa cells (hGLC). The expression of selected target genes was measured in the presence or absence of ERK- or AKT-pathways inhibitors. In COS-7/LHCGR cells, hCG is 5-fold more potent than hLH (cAMP ED(50): 107.1±14.3 pM and 530.0±51.2 pM, respectively). hLH maximal effect was significantly faster (10 minutes by hLH; 1 hour by hCG). In hGLC continuous exposure to equipotent doses of gonadotropins up to 36 hours revealed that intracellular cAMP production is oscillating and significantly higher by hCG versus hLH. Conversely, phospho-ERK1/2 and -AKT activation was more potent and sustained by hLH versus hCG. ERK1/2 and AKT inhibition removed the inhibitory effect on NRG1 (neuregulin) expression by hLH but not by hCG; ERK1/2 inhibition significantly increased hLH- but not hCG-stimulated CYP19A1 (aromatase) expression. We conclude that: i) hCG is more potent on cAMP production, while hLH is more potent on ERK and AKT activation; ii) hGLC respond to equipotent, constant hLH or hCG stimulation with a fluctuating cAMP production and progressive progesterone secretion; and iii) the expression of hLH and hCG target genes partly involves the activation of different pathways depending on the ligand. Therefore, the LHCGR is able to differentiate the activity of hLH and hCG.
•We elucidate differences in structure, expression, regulation, and function of LH and hCG.•Despite disparate endogenous functions, LH and hCG bind to a common receptor.•Relative proportions of LH ...and hCG isoforms fluctuate during the lifespan of both women and men.•Diverse isoforms of LH and hCG have distinct though often overlapping functions.•Knowledge of LH and hCG will foster further developments in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are widely recognized for their roles in ovulation and the support of early pregnancy. Aside from the timing of expression, however, the differences between LH and hCG have largely been overlooked in the clinical realm because of their similar molecular structures and shared receptor. With technologic advancements, including the development of highly purified and recombinant gonadotropins, researchers now appreciate that these hormones are not as interchangeable as once believed. Although they bind to a common receptor, emerging evidence suggests that LH and hCG have disparate effects on downstream signaling cascades. Increased understanding of the inherent differences between LH and hCG will foster more effective diagnostic and prognostic assays for use in a variety of clinical contexts and support the individualization of treatment strategies for conditions such as infertility.
The mechanisms that underly reproductive hormone effects on cognition, neuronal plasticity, and AD risk, particularly in relation to gonadotropin LH receptor (LHCGR) signaling, remain poorly ...understood. To address this gap in knowledge and clarify the impact of circulating steroid hormones on the therapeutic effects of CNS LHCGR activation, we delivered the LHCGR agonist human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intracerebroventricularly (ICV) and evaluated functional, structural, plasticity-related signaling cascades, Aβ pathology, and transcriptome differences in reproductively intact and ovariectomized (OVX) APP/PS1 AD female mice. Here we demonstrate that CNS hCG delivery restored function to wild-type levels only in OVX APP/PS1 mice. Spine density was increased in all hCG treated groups independently of reproductive status. Notably, increases in BDNF signaling and cognition, were selectively upregulated only in the OVX hCG-treated group. RNA sequencing analyses identified a significant increase in peripheral myeloid and pro-inflammatory genes within the hippocampi of the OVX group that were completely reversed by hCG treatment, identifying a potential mechanism underlying the selective therapeutic effect of LHCGR activation. Interestingly, in intact mice, hCG administration mimicked the effects of gonadectomy. Together, our findings indicate that CNS LHCGR agonism in the post-menopausal context is beneficial through trophic and immune mechanisms. Our findings also underscore the presence of a steroid-LHCGR mechanistic interaction that is unexplored yet potentially meaningful to fully understand “post-menopausal” brain function and CNS hormone treatment response.
•Activation of CNS LHCGR by hCG restores cognition and spine density in ovariectomized but not in gonadally intact APP/PS1 mice.•Hippocampal BDNF signaling is involved in the neuroprotective effects of LHCGR activation.•Ovariectomy in APP/PS1 mice exacerbates the presence of peripherally derived myeloid cell and pro-inflammatory genes.•The effects of CNS hCG delivery on pro-inflammatory genes is opposite in ovariectomized and gonadally intact APP/PS1 mice.•Neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of CNS hCG delivery are independent of changes in amyloid-beta pathology.
Naturally occurring mutations of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) causing misfolding and failure to traffic to the cell surface can result in disease states. Some small-molecule orthosteric ...ligands can rescue such misfolded receptors, presumably by facilitating their correct folding and shuttling to the plasma membrane. Here we show that a cell-permeant, allosterically binding small-molecule agonist (Org 42599) rescues the folding and cell surface expression, and therefore target cell signaling, of mutant human luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors (A593P and S616Y) that cause Leydig cell hypoplasia in man. Both mutant receptors were retained in the cytoplasm whereas WT receptor localized at the cell membrane, and binding of LH to cells expressing the mutant receptors was markedly lower than to those expressing the WT receptor. Incubation with Org 42599 increased mutant receptor expression, cell surface localization, and the proportion of mutant receptor in the mature glycosylated form. Importantly, although LH stimulated little (S616Y) or no (A593P) activation of cells expressing mutant receptors, incubation of cells with Org 42599 facilitated rescue of expression and stimulation by the native ligand, LH. Although Org 42599 could activate these receptors, it could not displace ¹²âµI-labeled human LH binding to the WT receptor, indicating that it acts in an allosteric manner. Here we demonstrate a small-molecule GPCR allosteric agonist that functionally rescues intracellularly retained mutant LH receptors by facilitating their cell surface expression. This approach may have application for treatment of infertile patients bearing such mutations and, more broadly, for other misfolded GPCR mutants resulting in human pathologic processes.
The expression of luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) in the mammalian ovary is regulated in response to changes in the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone by the ...anterior pituitary, at least in part, through posttranscriptional mechanisms. The steady-state levels of LHR mRNA are maintained by controlling its rate of degradation by an RNA-binding protein designated as LHR mRNA-binding protein (LRBP). LRBP forms a complex with LHR mRNA and targets it for degradation in the p bodies. miR-122, an 18 nucleotide noncoding RNA, regulates the expression of LRBP. Thus, the levels of miR-122 determine the cellular levels of LHR mRNA expression. This phenomenon has been examined during the induction of LHR mRNA expression that occurs during follicle maturation in response to rising levels of FSH. In this situation, miR-122 and LRBP levels decrease as LHR mRNA expression undergoes downregulation in response to preovulatory LH surge. miR-122 expression as well as LRBP levels show robust increases. The mechanism of induction of LRBP by miR-122 has also been discussed.
PDF
