For parenteral nutrition (PN) of newborns, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2018 guidelines recommend standardized solutions over individual PN ...(IPN) solutions for most patients. This retrospective study assessed if a shift from IPN to standardized PN was feasible at the UZ Brussel. Using prescription data of 145 neonates, we calculated the nutrient provision for IPN and for standardized PN of the same volumes. We compared the macronutrient intakes with ESPGHAN 2018 recommendations to assess the feasibility. For neonates of a gestational age (GA) <32 or >36 weeks, standardized PN reached recommendations as least as fast as IPN. For neonates with a GA of 32 to 36 weeks, the administration protocol requires further adjustments as amino acid provision was lacking compared to IPN. Overall, the results support the feasibility of a shift from IPN to standardized PN at the UZ Brussel.
Objetive: to quantify the number of neonates treated with individualized parenteral nutrition (IPN) who were candidates to receive standardized parenteral nutrition (SPN), and to calculate their ...treatment duration. Material and methods: this was a prospective, observational, descriptive cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: neonates with indication of parenteral nutrition (PN) and individualized prescription. Exclusion criteria included: patients who had not started diuresis, with specific nutritional needs, altered acid-base balance, and/or contraindication to receive SPN. Included variables were patient-related (gender, weight, weeks of gestation, and days of life) and treatment-related regarding IPN composition. Setting the volume of PN as the conversion criterion, theoretical contributions were calculated with the SPN. The criterion for a patient to be a candidate to receive SPN was that all the theoretical contributions calculated were within the reference requirements range. Results: a total of 33 neonates (9 women) received IPN with 94 prescriptions. The median weight of the patients included in the study was 2.14 (IQR, 0.9) kg, and they were born at 35 (IQR, 3) weeks of gestation. PN began between 0 and 4 days of life. In all, 71 % (22/31) of the patients in 54.1 % of their (46/85) prescriptions were candidates to receive SPN via central administration for 1 to 8 days, whereas no patient was candidate to receive SPN via peripheral administration. Conclusions: in our center, 71 % of neonates treated with central administration of IPN are candidates to receive SPN, thus promoting the normalization of nutritional support in this population.
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a high-alert medication available for patient care within a complex clinical process. Beyond application of best practice recommendations to guide safe use and optimize ...clinical outcome, several issues are better addressed through evidence-based policies, procedures, and practices. This document provides evidence-based guidance for clinical practices involving PN prescribing, order review, and preparation.
A systematic review of the best available evidence was used by an expert work group to answer a series of questions about PN prescribing, order review, compounding, labeling, and dispensing. Concepts from the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) format were applied as appropriate. The specific clinical guideline recommendations were developed using consensus prior to review and approval by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. The following questions were addressed: (1) Does education of prescribers improve PN ordering? (2) What is the maximum safe osmolarity of PN admixtures intended for peripheral vein administration? (3) What are the appropriate calcium intake and calcium-phosphate ratios in PN for optimal neonatal bone mineralization? (4) What are the clinical advantages or disadvantages of commercially available premade ("premixed") multichambered PN formulations compared with traditional/customized PN formulations? (5) What are the clinical (infection, catheter occlusion) advantages or disadvantages of 2-in-1 compared with 3-in-1 PN admixtures? (6) What macronutrient dosing limits are expected to provide for the most stable 3-in-1 admixtures? (7) What are the most appropriate recommendations for optimizing calcium (gluconate) and (Na- or K-) phosphate compatibility in PN admixtures? (8) What micronutrient contamination is present in parenteral stock solutions currently used to compound PN admixtures? (9) Is it safe to use the PN admixture as a vehicle for non-nutrient medication delivery? (10) Should heparin be included in the PN admixture to reduce the risk of central vein thrombosis? (11) What methods of repackaging intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE) into smaller patient-specific volumes are safe? (12) What beyond-use date should be used for (a) IVFE dispensed for separate infusion in the original container and (b) repackaged IVFE?
Summary
Background
The catheter lock solutions 2% taurolidine and 0.9% saline are both used to prevent catheter‐related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in home parenteral nutrition patients.
Aims
To ...compare the effectiveness and safety of taurolidine and saline.
Methods
This multicentre double‐blinded trial randomly assigned home parenteral nutrition patients to use either 2% taurolidine or 0.9% saline for 1 year. Patients were stratified in a new catheter group and a pre‐existing catheter group. Primary outcome was the rate of CRBSIs/1000 catheter days in the new catheter group and pre‐existing catheter group, separately.
Results
We randomised 105 patients, of which 102 were analysed as modified intention‐to‐treat population. In the new catheter group, rates of CRBSIs/1000 catheter days were 0.29 and 1.49 in the taurolidine and saline arm respectively (relative risk, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04‐0.71; P = 0.009). In the pre‐existing catheter group, rates of CRBSIs/1000 catheter days were 0.39 and 1.32 in the taurolidine and saline arm respectively (relative risk, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.03‐1.82; P = 0.25). Excluding one outlier patient in the taurolidine arm, mean costs per patient were $1865 for taurolidine and $4454 for saline (P = 0.03). Drug‐related adverse events were rare and generally mild.
Conclusions
In the new catheter group, taurolidine showed a clear decrease in CRBSI rate. In the pre‐existing catheter group, no superiority of taurolidine could be demonstrated, most likely due to underpowering. Overall, taurolidine reduced the risk for CRBSIs by more than four times. Given its favourable safety and cost profile, taurolidine locking should be considered as an additional strategy to prevent CRBSIs.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01826526.
Nutritional support of surgical and critically ill patients has undergone significant advances since 1936 when Studley demonstrated a direct relationship between pre-operative weight loss and ...operative mortality. The advent of total parenteral nutrition followed by the extraordinary progress in parenteral and enteral feedings, in addition to the increased knowledge of cellular biology and biochemistry, have allowed clinicians to treat malnutrition and improve surgical patient's outcomes. We reviewed the literature for the current status of perioperative nutrition comparing parenteral nutrition with enteral nutrition. In a surgical patient with established malnutrition, nutritional support should begin at least 7-10 days prior to surgery. Those patients in whom eating is not anticipated beyond the first five days following surgery should receive the benefits of early enteral or parenteral feeding depending on whether the gut can be used. Compared to parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition is associated with fewer complications, a decrease in the length of hospital stay, and a favorable cost-benefit analysis. In addition, many patients may benefit from newer enteral formulations such as Immunonutrition as well as disease-specific formulations.
Parenteral nutrition (PN) has become an integral part of clinical management of very low birth weight premature neonates. Traditionally different components of PN are prescribed individually ...considering requirements of an individual neonate (IPN). More recently, standardised PN formulations (SPN) for preterm neonates have been assessed and may have advantages including better provision of nutrients, less prescription and administration errors, decreased risk of infection, and cost savings. The recent introduction of triple-chamber bag that provides total nutrient admixture for neonates may have additional advantage of decreased risk of contamination and ease of administration.
Summary Background Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is the mainstay of treatment for patients with Type 3 intestinal failure (IF), however long term data on mortality and nutritional outcomes are ...limited. Objectives To assess the long-term survival and requirements for ongoing HPN in patients receiving treatment at a UK national referral centre for intestinal failure. Methods Patients with IF who received HPN for more than 3 months at this Intestinal Failure Unit between 1978 and 2011 had their clinical records reviewed. SPSS 20 was utilised to perform Cox regression analysis and generate Kaplan Meier curves, with the aim of identifying factors associated with death and the continued need for HPN. Results Case notes from 545 patients were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) in patients without malignancy at commencement of IF was 93%, 71%, 59% and 28% at 1, 5, 10 and 20 years after starting treatment. Crohn's disease, mesenteric ischaemia and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction were associated with a better OS than scleroderma and radiation enteritis on multivariate analysis. Older age at onset of IF was associated with poor OS, while shorter small bowel length or central line sepsis was not. 15% (25/170) of deaths were due to complications of HPN (central line sepsis = 10, IF-associated liver disease = 15). Continued HPN dependence in survivors was 83%, 63%, 59% and 53% at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Among the 153 patients without malignancy who achieved nutritional independence from HPN, 77 (50.3%) did so after surgical reconstruction of the alimentary tract (HPN duration mean 19 months, range 3–126 months). 76 patients (49.7%) weaned from HPN without undergoing surgical reconstruction. Conclusion This is the largest reported data set on long-term survival and dependence on HPN and will inform the indications, benefits and risks of treatment in disease specific groups. A significant proportion of patients achieved nutritional autonomy without surgical intervention.
PDF
