The paper consists of four parts. The introductory part focuses to the argument made by the Slovenian literary theorist M. Juvan who claims that literary theory should be restructured as the theory ...of literary discourse, based on the “discourse turn” in the contemporary stylistics. The paper further discusses the style in the field of discourse by analysing ambiguous relationship between style and discourse, and by introducing the concept of style as an identity marker (Juvan). This is followed by the concept of the stylistics of (inter)discourse based on the term interdiscursivity. The notion of interdiscursivity is discussed through its different applications and definitions (Kovačević and Badurina, Fairclough, Pecheux, Link), and its distinctiveness in relation to intertextuality. The final part of the paper offers an analysis of interdiscursivity in selected literary texts, with special emphasis on the texts of literary avant-garde (Slabinac), and relates interdiscursivity to J. Ranciere’s politics of literature.
Rad analizira roman Daše Drndić Leica format (2003) iz perspektive diskurzne stilistike
i to tako što motri na koji se način načelo interdiskurzivnosti artikulira na stilskoj razini
romana pri čemu ...upravo radikalno ogoljeni interdiskurzivni šavovi postaju polazišnom
točkom interpretacije. Kao temeljna interdiskurzivna figura u ovom romanu uzima se
fuga koja istovremeno konotira složenost, polifoničnost i interdiskurzivnu premreženost
romanesknog teksta, a na metarazini otvara pitanje pamćenja i zaborava, oblikovanja i
prenošenja znanja te njegova kodiranja u jeziku i diskurzu. Analiza pokazuje kako u
navedenom romanu Daša Drndić mapira osobnu i kolektivnu povijest usložnjavanjem i
kolažiranjem različitih tipova tekstova, žanrova i diskurzā te kako se pritom stilistički
zahvati na grafičkom planu romanesknog teksta produžuju u područje njegove semantike.
