Zagotovitev kakovosti v zdravstvu postaja pomembnejša dejavnost plačnikov in ponudnikov zdravstvenih storitev, prav tako mednarodne organizacije uspešno akreditacijo pogojujejo z izvajanjem programov ...nadzora kakovosti. Za analizo pomanjkljivosti v zagotavljanju storitev se uporabljajo kazalniki kakovosti, ki analizirajo strukture, procese in izide v zdravstvenem sistemu in s tem omogočijo načrtovanje in izvedbo izboljšav zdravstvenih storitev. V radioterapiji je tradicija nadzora kakovosti, ki se razvija vzporedno s tehnološkimi in metodološkimi spremembami na tem področju. Pri analizi izidov zdravljenja, ki so najbolj poveden kazalnik kakovosti onkoloških zdravstvenih storitev, se velikokrat srečujemo z nezanesljivostjo podatkov oz. zapletenim dostopom do njih, kar zmanjšuje ažurnost in verodostojnost rezultatov. Namen tega članka je pregled kazalnikov kakovosti v radioterapiji in onkologiji.
Zagotovitev kakovosti v zdravstvu postaja pomembnejša dejavnost plačnikov in ponudnikov zdravstvenih storitev, prav tako mednarodne organizacije uspešno akreditacijo pogojujejo z izvajanjem programov ...nadzora kakovosti. Za analizo pomanjkljivosti v zagotavljanju storitev se uporabljajo kazalniki kakovosti, ki analizirajo strukture, procese in izide v zdravstvenem sistemu in s tem omogočijo načrtovanje in izvedbo izboljšav zdravstvenih storitev. V radioterapiji je tradicija nadzora kakovosti, ki se razvija vzporedno s tehnološkimi in metodološkimi spremembami na tem področju. Pri analizi izidov zdravljenja, ki so najbolj poveden kazalnik kakovosti onkoloških zdravstvenih storitev, se velikokrat srečujemo z nezanesljivostjo podatkov oz. zapletenim dostopom do njih, kar zmanjšuje ažurnost in verodostojnost rezultatov. Namen tega članka je pregled kazalnikov kakovosti v radioterapiji in onkologiji.
A new organisation at the primary level, called model practices, introduces a 0.5 full-time equivalent nurse practitioner as a regular member of the team. Nurse practitioners are in charge of ...registers of chronic patients, and implement an active approach into medical care. Selected quality indicators define the quality of management. The majority of studies confirm the effectiveness of the extended team in the quality of care, which is similar or improved when compared to care performed by the physician alone. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of management of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 before and after the introduction of model practices.
A cohort retrospective study was based on medical records from three practices. Process quality indicators, such as regularity of HbA1c measurement, blood pressure measurement, foot exam, referral to eye exam, performance of yearly laboratory tests and HbA1c level before and after the introduction of model practices were compared.
The final sample consisted of 132 patients, whose diabetes care was exclusively performed at the primary care level. The process of care has significantly improved after the delivery of model practices. The most outstanding is the increase of foot exam and HbA1c testing. We could not prove better glycaemic control (p>0.1). Nevertheless, the proposed benchmark for the suggested quality process and outcome indicators were mostly exceeded in this cohort.
The introduction of a nurse into the team improves the process quality of care. Benchmarks for quality indicators are obtainable. Better outcomes of care need further confirmation.
A new form of family practices was introduced in 2011 through a pilot project introducing nurse practitioners as members of team and determining a set of quality indicators. The aim of this article ...was to assess the quality of diabetes and hypertension management.
We included all family medicine practices that were participating in the project in December 2015 (N=584). The following data were extracted from automatic electronic reports on quality indicators: gender and specialisation of the family physician, status (public servant/self-contracted), duration of participation in the project, region of Slovenia, the number of inhabitants covered by a family medicine practice, the name of IT provider, and levels of selected quality indicators.
Out of 584 family medicine practices that were included in this project at the end of 2015, 568 (97.3%) had complete data and could be included in this analysis. The highest values were observed for structure quality indicator (list of diabetics) and the lowest for process and outcome quality indicators. The values of the selected quality indicators were independently associated with the duration of participation in the project, some regions of Slovenia where practices were located, and some IT providers of the practices.
First, the analysis of data on quality indicators for diabetes and hypertension in this primary care project pointed out the problems which are currently preventing higher quality of chronic patient management at the primary health care level.
PDF