DIKUL - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Classification of Lattice D...
    Chen, Shiyou; Walsh, Aron; Gong, Xin-Gao; Wei, Su-Huai

    Advanced materials (Weinheim), March 20, 2013, Letnik: 25, Številka: 11
    Journal Article

    The kesterite‐structured semiconductors Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 are drawing considerable attention recently as the active layers in earth‐abundant low‐cost thin‐film solar cells. The additional number of elements in these quaternary compounds, relative to binary and ternary semiconductors, results in increased flexibility in the material properties. Conversely, a large variety of intrinsic lattice defects can also be formed, which have important influence on their optical and electrical properties, and hence their photovoltaic performance. Experimental identification of these defects is currently limited due to poor sample quality. Here recent theoretical research on defect formation and ionization in kesterite materials is reviewed based on new systematic calculations, and compared with the better studied chalcopyrite materials CuGaSe2 and CuInSe2. Four features are revealed and highlighted: (i) the strong phase‐competition between the kesterites and the coexisting secondary compounds; (ii) the intrinsic p‐type conductivity determined by the high population of acceptor CuZn antisites and Cu vacancies, and their dependence on the Cu/(Zn+Sn) and Zn/Sn ratio; (iii) the role of charge‐compensated defect clusters such as 2CuZn+SnZn, VCu+ZnCu and ZnSn+2ZnCu and their contribution to non‐stoichiometry; (iv) the electron‐trapping effect of the abundant 2CuZn+SnZn clusters, especially in Cu2ZnSnS4. The calculated properties explain the experimental observation that Cu poor and Zn rich conditions (Cu/(Zn+Sn) ≈ 0.8 and Zn/Sn ≈ 1.2) result in the highest solar cell efficiency, as well as suggesting an efficiency limitation in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 cells when the S composition is high. The physics of lattice defects in kesterite structured Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 and chalcopyrite structured CuInSe2 and CuGaSe2 crystals is investigated and compared based on the first‐principles calculations. The influence of shallow acceptor defects, deep donor defects and charge‐compensated defect clusters on the non‐stoichiometry, hole carrier concentration and solar cell efficiency of these materials is revealed.