E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Haneef, Zulfi; Skrehot, Henry C.
Epilepsia (Copenhagen), April 2023, 2023-04-00, 20230401, Letnik: 64, Številka: 4Journal Article
Objective There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head‐to‐head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta‐analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy. Methods Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug‐resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS (“vagus”, “vagal”, or “VNS” in the title and “epilepsy” or “seizure”), DBS (“deep brain stimulation”, “DBS”, “anterior thalamic nucleus”, “centromedian nucleus”, or “thalamic stimulation” in the title and “epilepsy” or “seizure”), and RNS (“responsive neurostimulation” or “RNS” in the title and “epilepsy” or “seizure”). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full‐text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random‐effects model using the meta package in R. Results Sufficient data for meta‐analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta‐analysis. The mean (SD) follow‐up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta‐analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval CI = 38.7%–57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%–75.2%) for DBS (p = .02). Significance Our meta‐analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.