Contributing to the growing amount of literature on learning–enhancing feedback, this article attempts to distinguish between progress feedback and discrepancy feedback. Building on relevant literature drawn from psychology, we propose the use of a ratio of 3:1, positive:negative feedback. We analyzed contiguous 10 min blocks of classroom interactions from 78 teachers. Findings indicate that teachers seldom provide the types of feedback interventions identified as effective in enhancing learning in the course of typical classroom interactions. We examine potential explanations for this, discuss the consequences of this finding on teacher education and professional development, and offer several opportunities for future research. ► We propose to distinguish between progress and discrepancy feedback. ► We propose a ratio of 3:1 on positive and negative feedback in teaching. ► Teachers in secondary education seldom provided the effective types of feedback. ► Frequency and types of feedback did not differ for experience or age.