DIKUL - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
  • Energy management in microg...
    Harsh, Pratik; Das, Debapriya

    Sustainable energy technologies and assessments, August 2021, 2021-08-00, Letnik: 46
    Journal Article

    •Integration of demand response and reconfiguration for energy schedule of microgrid.•Participation of energy consumers in energy management problem of microgrid.•Consideration of uncertainties in renewable sources using point estimation method.•Fixed power exchange between grid and microgrid using feeder flow control mode. Demand response (DR) programs and reconfiguration of distribution networks are generally adopted in the energy management (EM) problem of microgrid to enhance the technical and economical features of microgrid. Assuming a fixed configuration of distribution network, DR programs usually optimize the generation cost by encouraging the consumers to reduce their energy demands. Whereas reconfiguration of network is done for a pre-defined generation schedule and energy demand. However, separate incorporation of these two operational techniques in the EM problem may lead to a non-optimal solution. In this paper, a joint framework is proposed to integrate a novel incentive-based DR program and reconfiguration method in the EM problem of microgrid on a day-ahead time frame. The objective of the work is to minimize the fuel cost of conventional distributed generation (DG) and the cost of power purchased from the grid, while maximizing the profit for microgrid operator (MGO). The efficacy of the proposed model is tested on a static model of grid-connected 33-bus microgrid which consists of renewable energy (RE) sources and a conventional DG. To account the uncertainties in RE sources, Hong’s (2m+1) point estimation method (PEM) is considered in this work. The result confirms that the incorporation of DR program and reconfiguration method in the EM problem leads to an optimum energy schedule for the microgrid with a minimum lossy network. For the single-day operation of microgrid, it has been found that the power transfer from the grid and power lost in the network is reduced by 10.83% and 34.03% respectively.