DIKUL - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Wild vs cultivated halophyt...
    Castañeda-Loaiza, Viana; Oliveira, Marta; Santos, Tamára; Schüler, Lisa; Lima, Alexandre R.; Gama, Florinda; Salazar, Miguel; Neng, Nuno R.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Varela, João; Barreira, Luísa

    Food chemistry, 12/2020, Letnik: 333
    Journal Article

    •Wild and cultivated halophytes showed favourable nutritional properties.•Studied halophytes are a good source of minerals and proteins, and poor in fat.•Cultivated halophytes are more succulent and have less fibres.•Cultivated halophytes have less antioxidants than wild plants.•S. maritima is a source of antioxidant compounds, vitamins and carotenoid pigments. Some halophyte plants are currently used in gourmet cuisine due to their unique organoleptic properties. Moreover, they exhibit excellent nutritional and functional properties, being rich in polyphenolics and vitamins. These compounds are associated to strong antioxidant activity and enhanced health benefits. This work compared the nutritional properties and antioxidant potential of three species (Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum, Suaeda maritima and Sarcocornia fruticosa) collected in saltmarshes from Portugal and Spain with those of cultivated plants. The latter were generally more succulent and had higher contents of minerals than plants obtained from the wild and contained less fibre. All species assayed are a good source of proteins, fibres and minerals. Additionally, they are good sources of carotenoids and vitamins A, C and B6 and showed good antioxidant potential particularly S. maritima. Chromatographic analysis of the phenolic profile revealed that ferulic and caffeic acids as the most relevant phenolic compounds detected in the halophytes tested.