DIKUL - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Reciprocal effects of neuro...
    Metts, Allison; Yarrington, Julia; Enders, Craig; Hammen, Constance; Mineka, Susan; Zinbarg, Richard; Craske, Michelle G.

    Journal of affective disorders, 02/2021, Letnik: 281
    Journal Article

    •Selection effects are evident between neuroticism and interpersonal chronic stress, total non-interpersonal episodic stress, and dependent non-interpersonal episodic stress.•Socialization effects are evident between total chronic stress, interpersonal chronic stress, non-interpersonal chronic stress, and dependent non-interpersonal episodic stress and neuroticism.•Life stress and neuroticism do not operate independently and can serve as key intervention targets for adolescents. Background: Stressful life experiences and personality can influence one another. Personality may contribute to the amount and type of stress individuals experience, which is referred to as a selection effect. Life stress may also impact one's personality, which is referred to as a socialization effect. It was hypothesized that neuroticism would predict increased chronic and episodic stress (selection effect) and that chronic and episodic stress would predict increased neuroticism (socialization effect). Methods: The current study investigated selection and socialization effects of neuroticism and life stress over a three-year period in 627 adolescents. Life stress data were examined in terms of duration (chronic versus episodic) and type (interpersonal versus non-interpersonal). Episodic stress data were examined as dependent or independent. Results: The results from ten cross-lagged panel models provided some evidence for significant selection and socialization effects depending on stress type. Over three years, we observed that neuroticism increases interpersonal chronic stress and non-interpersonal stressful events (selection effects) and that dependent non-interpersonal stressful events and chronic stress increase neuroticism (socialization effects). Limitations: Study limitations include a lack of a lifespan perspective and a statistical approach that does not differentiate between- from within-person variance. Conclusions: Findings suggest the value of attending to stress response as well as targeting neuroticism in prevention and intervention approaches in adolescents.