E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Cho, Byoung Chul; Lee, Jong Seok; Wu, Yi-Long; Cicin, Irfan; Dols, Manuel Cobo; Ahn, Myung-Ju; Cuppens, Kristof; Veillon, Rémi; Nadal, Ernest; Dias, Josiane Mourão; Martin, Claudio; Reck, Martin; Garon, Edward B.; Felip, Enriqueta; Paz-Ares, Luis; Mornex, Francoise; Vokes, Everett E.; Adjei, Alex A.; Robinson, Clifford; Sato, Masashi; Vugmeyster, Yulia; Machl, Andreas; Audhuy, Francois; Chaudhary, Surendra; Barlesi, Fabrice
Journal of thoracic oncology, 12/2023, Letnik: 18, Številka: 12Journal Article
Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1–high advanced NSCLC. This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1–high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival. Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval CI: 13.1–16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1–15.9 mo) for pembrolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent review committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo 95% CI: 4.2 mo–not reached (NR) versus 11.1 mo 95% CI: 8.1 mo–NR; hazard ratio = 1.232 95% CI: 0.885–1.714). The median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo–NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo–NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 95% CI: 0.796–1.811). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point. First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1–high, advanced NSCLC.
Avtor
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.