DIKUL - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Evolution of genomic profil...
    Lizcova, Libuse; Vidlakova, Denisa; Lhotska, Halka; Svobodova, Karla; Hodanova, Lucie; Cechova, Hana; Aghova, Tatiana; Ransdorfova, Sarka; Pavlistova, Lenka; Netuka, David; Hrabal, Petr; Kramar, Filip; Zemanova, Zuzana

    Journal of clinical oncology, 06/2023, Letnik: 41, Številka: 16_suppl
    Journal Article

    e14042 Background: Diffuse gliomas are highly heterogenous tumors with variable biological behaviors, including high intratumor and extratumor heterogeneity, and with occurrence of recurrent lesions in majority of patients. During disease progression, gliomas undergo cellular and genomic evolution with newly acquired genetic properties. However, the mechanism of this complicated process associated with treatment failure is poorly understood. In this retrospective study, we performed cytogenomic analyses of primary and recurrent tumors in five patients with diffuse glioma who underwent surgical resections or biopsies of multiple recurrences. Methods: One primary and at least two recurrent freshly resected tumor tissues from each patient were analyzed using combination of cytogenomic methods. To assess specific and random copy number alterations (CNAs), I-FISH (Abbott Molecular, MetaSystems), array CGH/SNP (Agilent) and MLPA (MRC Holland) were performed. Methylation of MGMT promoter was investigated by methylation-specific MLPA (MRC Holland) and mutations of 67 genes associated with solid tumors were assessed by target NGS (Archer VariantPlex Solid Tumor, Invitae). Results: All five patients (three men and two women) experienced recurrence with newly acquired genetic or epigenetic changes. We observed a higher frequency of CNAs in recurrent gliomas than in primary tumors. Moreover, several aberrations were not detected in recurrence despite being found in earlier samples. As a primary event we proved mutation R132H of IDH1 gene. In addition, we detected methylation of the MGMT promoter, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, and RB1 deletion as later events that were probably associated with higher tumor grades. Besides the typical genomic changes, we detected many aberrations with unknown or unclear prognostic relevance (e.g. inframe deletion in TP53, p.Met243_Asn247del, etc.). The progression to a higher grade of glioma occurred in four patients. Conclusions: The evolutional patterns in glioma depend on clonal selection caused by CNAs, mutations, genetic drift, intratumor heterogeneity and/or the patient’s treatment. Recurrence may arise from one major tumor clone or from one or more subclones within the primary tumor through. Integrated cytogenomic analyses of genetic/epigenetic profiles of primary and all recurrent tissues can contribute to a better understanding of mechanisms responsible for these processes and to identification of new alterations related to gliomas progression and/or resistance to treatment. These biomarkers could subsequently serve as new therapeutic targets for personalized treatment.