The outcome of SARS-CoV2 infection in patients who have received a kidney allograft and are being treated with immunosuppression is unclear. We describe 20 kidney transplant recipients (median age 59 ...years inter quartile range 51-64 years, median age of transplant 13 years 9-20 years, baseline eGFR 36.5 23-47.5) with SARS-CoV2 induced pneumonia. At admission, all had immunosuppression withdrawn and were started on methylprednisolone 16 mg/day, all but one was commenced on antiviral therapy and hydroxychloroquine with doses adjusted for kidney function. At baseline, all patients presented fever but only one complained of difficulty in breathing. Half of patients showed chest radiographic evidence of bilateral infiltrates while the other half showed unilateral changes or no infiltrates. During a median follow-up of seven days, 87% experienced a radiological progression and among those 73% required escalation of oxygen therapy. Six patients developed acute kidney injury with one requiring hemodialysis. Six of 12 patients were treated with tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to the IL-6 receptor. Overall, five kidney transplant recipients died after a median period of 15 days 15-19 from symptom onset. These preliminary findings describe a rapid clinical deterioration associated with chest radiographic deterioration and escalating oxygen requirement in renal transplant recipients with SARS-Cov2 pneumonia. Thus, in this limited cohort of long-term kidney transplant patients, SARS-CoV-2 induced pneumonia is characterized by high risk of progression and significant mortality.
Display omitted
A cyclic corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide regimen is the first-line therapy for membranous nephropathy. Compared with this regimen, rituximab therapy might have a more favorable safety profile, but a ...head-to-head comparison is lacking.
We randomly assigned 74 adults with membranous nephropathy and proteinuria >3.5 g/d to rituximab (1 g) on days 1 and 15, or a 6-month cyclic regimen with corticosteroids alternated with cyclophosphamide every other month. The primary outcome was complete remission of proteinuria at 12 months. Other outcomes included determination of complete or partial remission at 24 months and occurrence of adverse events.
At 12 months, six of 37 patients (16%) randomized to rituximab and 12 of 37 patients (32%) randomized to the cyclic regimen experienced complete remission (odds ratio OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.23); 23 of 37 (62%) receiving rituximab and 27 of 37 (73%) receiving the cyclic regimen had complete or partial remission (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.63). At 24 months, the probabilities of complete and of complete or partial remission with rituximab were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.62) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.95), respectively, and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.61) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93), respectively, with the cyclic regimen. Serious adverse events occurred in 19% of patients receiving rituximab and in 14% receiving the cyclic regimen.
This pilot trial found no signal of more benefit or less harm associated with rituximab versus a cyclic corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide regimen in the treatment of membranous nephropathy. A head-to-head, pragmatic comparison of the cyclic regimen versus rituximab may require a global noninferiority trial.
Rituximab versus Steroids and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (RI-CYCLO), NCT03018535.
We aimed to assess risk factors for the development of severe infection in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) receiving rituximab.
192 patients with AAV were ...identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for severe infection following rituximab. Severe infections were classified as grade ≥3 as proposed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.0.
95 severe infections were recorded in 49 (25.52%) patients, corresponding to an event rate of 26.06 per 100 person-years. The prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was associated with a lower frequency of severe infections (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.69), while older age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05), endobronchial involvement (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.26), presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 6.30, 95% CI 1.08 to 36.75) and previous alemtuzumab use (HR 3.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 10.54) increased the risk. When analysis was restricted to respiratory tract infections (66.3% of all infections), endobronchial involvement (HR 4.27, 95% CI 1.81 to 10.06), severe bronchiectasis (HR 6.14, 95% CI 1.18 to 31.91), higher neutrophil count (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33) and major relapse (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.23) as indication for rituximab use conferred a higher risk, while refractory disease (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90) as indication had a lower frequency of severe infections.
We found severe infections in one quarter of patients with AAV receiving rituximab. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis reduced the risk, while especially bronchiectasis and endobronchial involvement are risk factors for severe respiratory infections.
ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) are the prototype of a disease characterised by the presence of a biomarker; ANCA positivity in fact is recorded in 90% of cases of GPA and MPA. The role of ANCA in ...the management of AAV ranges from diagnostic to prognostic purposes with also therapeutic implications. Changes in clinical practice with the increased use of rituximab have drawn attention to B-cells as a biomarker able to contribute to patient management. Cytokines and other circulating factors, although still at a research stage, may represent future biomarkers of interest or even therapeutic options. From the point of view of renal involvement in AAV, proteinuria and microhematuria are still the biomarkers employed in everyday clinical practice with a proposed role for emerging ones (MCP1, CD163 and CD25). The aim of this review is to discuss the role of well-known biomarkers in everyday clinical management of AAV patients as well as future perspectives for those that are still at a research stage with attention to therapeutic implications.
Primary Membranous Nephropathy (PMN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. If untreated, PMN can lead to end-stage renal disease; moreover, affected patients are at increased ...risk of complications typical of nephrotic syndrome such as fluid overload, deep vein thrombosis and infection. The association of PMN with
and the identification in around 70% of cases of circulating autoantibodies, mainly directed towards the phospholipase A2 receptor, supports the autoimmune nature of the disease. In patients not achieving spontaneous remission or in the ones with deteriorating kidney function and severe nephrotic syndrome, immunosuppression is required to increase the chances of achieving remission. The aim of this review is to discuss the evidence base for the different immunosuppressive regimens used for PMN in studies published so far; the manuscript also includes a section where the authors propose, based upon current evidence, their recommendations regarding immunosuppression in the disease, while highlighting the still significant knowledge gaps and uncertainties.
Summary Background Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, but they often have substantial toxic effects. Several reports have suggested tamoxifen as an ...alternative to glucocorticoids. We compared the efficacy of prednisone with that of tamoxifen in maintainance of remission in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Methods In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 18–85 years with newly diagnosed idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis at the Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy, between Oct 1, 2000, and June 30, 2006. After induction therapy with 1 mg/kg daily of prednisone for 1 month, the patients who achieved remission were randomly assigned to receive tapering prednisone (initial dose 0·5 mg/kg daily) for 8 months or tamoxifen (fixed dose 0·5 mg/kg daily) for 8 months. The sequence of randomisation (1:1), blocked in groups of two and four (with block size randomly selected), was generated by the trial statistician with a computer programme. After the end of treatment, the patients were followed up for an additional 18 months. Neither patients nor those giving interventions or analysing the data were masked to group assignment. The two radiologists who assessed CT and MRI scans were masked. The primary endpoint was the relapse rate by the end of treatment (month 8), which was analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00440349. Findings After induction therapy, 36 of the 40 enrolled patients achieved remission and were randomly assigned to treatment (18 per group). One patient (6%) in the prednisone group and seven patients (39%) in the tamoxifen group relapsed by the end of treatment (difference −33% 95% CI −58 to −8, p=0·0408. The difference in relapse rate between the groups was sustained after the additional 18-month follow-up: the 26-month estimated cumulative relapse probability was 17% with prednisone and 50% with tamoxifen (difference −33% −62 to −3, p=0·0372). Cushingoid changes and grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia were more common in the prednisone group than in the tamoxifen group (p=0·0116 and p=0·0408, respectively). Interpretation Prednisone is more effective in prevention of relapses than is tamoxifen in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Therefore, prednisone should be considered as first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Funding Parma University Hospital.
ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is characterized by a chronic relapsing course. Rituximab (RTX) is an effective maintenance treatment; however, the long-term outcomes after its discontinuation are ...unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term outcomes of AAV patients treated with repeat-dose RTX maintenance therapy.
AAV patients receiving a RTX treatment protocol consisting of an induction and maintenance phase were included. For initial remission induction, RTX was dosed at 1 g every 2 weeks or 375 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks and for remission maintenance at 1 g every 6 months for 24 months. At the first RTX administration, ongoing immunosuppressives were withdrawn.
Sixty-nine patients were identified, 67 of whom were failing other therapies. Nine relapsed during the RTX treatment protocol; however, all 69 were in remission at the end of the maintenance phase on a median prednisolone dose of 2.5 mg/day and 9% were receiving additional immunosuppression. During subsequent observation, 28 patients relapsed a median of 34.4 months after the last RTX infusion. Risk factors for relapse were PR3-associated disease (P = 0.039), B cell return within 12 months of the last RTX infusion (P = 0.0038) and switch from ANCA negativity to positivity (P = 0.0046). Two patients died and two developed severe hypogammaglobulinaemia.
This study supports the efficacy and safety of a fixed-interval RTX maintenance regimen in relapsing/refractory AAV. Relapses after discontinuation of maintenance therapy did occur, but at a lower rate than after a single RTX induction course. PR3-associated disease, the switch from ANCA negative to positive and the return of B cells within 12 months of the last RTX administration were risk factors for further relapse.
The treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is based on remission-induction and remission-maintenance. Methotrexate is a widely used immunosuppressant but ...only a few studies explored its role for maintenance in AAV. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of methotrexate as maintenance therapy for AAV.
In this single-centre, open-label, randomised trial we compared methotrexate and cyclophosphamide for maintenance in AAV. We enrolled patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), the latter with poor-prognosis factors and/or peripheral neuropathy. Remission was induced with cyclophosphamide. At remission, the patients were randomised to receive methotrexate or to continue with cyclophosphamide for 12 months; after treatment, they were followed for another 12 months. The primary end-point was relapse; secondary end-points included renal outcomes and treatment-related toxicity.
Of the 94 enrolled patients, 23 were excluded during remission-induction or did not achieve remission; the remaining 71 were randomised to cyclophosphamide (n = 33) or methotrexate (n = 38). Relapse frequencies at months 12 and 24 after randomisation were not different between the two groups (p = 1.00 and 1.00). Relapse-free survival was also comparable (log-rank test p = 0.99). No differences in relapses were detected between the two treatments when GPA+MPA and EGPA were analysed separately. There were no differences in eGFR at months 12 and 24; proteinuria declined significantly (from diagnosis to month 24) only in the cyclophosphamide group (p = 0.0007). No significant differences in adverse event frequencies were observed.
MTX may be effective and safe for remission-maintenance in AAV.
clinicaltrials.gov NCT00751517.
In recent years, clinical research has increased significantly and therapies for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis have improved. However, there are still unanswered ...questions and unmet needs about AAV patients. The purpose of this review is to examine the frontiers of research related to emerging biomarkers eventually predicting relapse, and new therapeutic approaches, not to mention new quality of life assessment tools. Identifying predictors of relapse may help optimize therapeutic strategies, minimize disease recurrence, and reduce treatment-related side effects. In addition, it is important to recognize that patients may suffer long-term consequences of the disease and its treatment, which, although life-saving, is often associated with significant side effects. Our goal, therefore, is to highlight what has been achieved, the pitfalls, and what still needs to be done, comparing the views of physicians and patients.
PDF
