Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are typically caused by microorganisms that grow in biofilms. Traditional antimicrobial susceptibility tests are based on the study of planktonic bacteria that ...might lead to missing the biofilm behavior and to a treatment failure. This study was designed to analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) isolates from PJIs in planktonic and sessile states and the possible relationship between antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation. A total of 46 clinical isolates from patients with PJIs (mainly hip and knee prostheses) plus three GNB ATCC isolates were studied. The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC), minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC), and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) were assessed using a previously published methodology. Almost all of the GNB clinical isolates tested were biofilm forming. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the largest biofilm-forming species. A comparison of MBIC90 versus MIC90 shows an increase higher than 1- to -2-fold dilutions in most antimicrobials studied, and MBEC90 was significantly higher than MIC90, becoming resistant to all the antimicrobial drugs tested. Higher biofilm production values were obtained in antibiotic-susceptible Escherichia coli in comparison to their resistant counterparts. However, regarding the relationships between antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation, our analysis showed that each strain differed. A high antimicrobial resistance rate was found among the GNB studied. Moreover, almost all bacterial isolates were in vitro biofilm formers. Although there was no significant association between biofilm and antibiotic resistance, multidrug-resistant isolates were found to be greater biofilm formers than non-multidrug-resistant isolates. IMPORTANCE This study is the first one to analyze a high number of isolates of Gram-negative bacilli that are the cause of prosthetic joint infection. The analysis includes biofilm development and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of both planktonic and sessile bacteria. The obtained results support the clinical knowledge about the treatment of these bacteria when biofilms are involved.
While tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by members of the
complex are exceptionally rare. Our objective is to perform a retrospective ...search of new cases of this disease and analyze all cases available in the literature of tuberculous PJIs, aiming to detect factors that may influence patient outcomes.
The ESGIAI and ESGMYC study groups were used to collect information on non-published cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Additionally, a literature review of all published cases of tuberculous PJIs was conducted. All identified cases in the retrospective study and in the literature review were merged and included in the statistical analysis, involving both univariate and multivariate analyses.
Fifteen previously unreported cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) from four countries were detailed. Among them, ten patients were female, with a median age of 76 years. The hip was affected in 13 cases. Seven patients experienced co-infection with another microorganism. Treatment approaches varied, with 13 patients undergoing implant removal, one treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), and one case was treated with an unknown treatment method. All patients received antibiotic therapy and achieved a cure. The literature review that was conducted detected 155 published cases. Univariate analysis revealed a statistical significance for previous tuberculosis, joint, and no importance of surgery for cure.
Tuberculous prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare condition, typically presenting as a localized chronic infection. Antibiotic treatment is essential for the management of these patients, but neither surgical treatment nor duration of treatment seems to have importance in the outcome.
Background:
Infection is one of the challenging complications after open reduction and internal fixation for ankle fractures. Previously published case series conclude that Staphylococcus aureus is ...the most frequent causative microorganism. An unexpected increase in Enterobacter cloacae infections after this surgery was observed in a preliminary analysis of data at the promoting center of the study. In traumatology, its incidence has been reported in chronic osteomyelitis, prosthetic infections, septic osteoarthritis, open fractures in children and adults, and fractures other than the ankle. Because of this unexpected finding, we decided to perform this study to analyze the demographic and microbiological variables of acute osteosynthesis infection after ankle fracture and determine the distinctive features of the patients with E cloacae infection.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective multicenter study including 4 university hospitals. All patients diagnosed with acute osteosynthesis infection after ankle fracture fixation between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. We analyzed demographic data, type of fracture, surgical technique, and microorganisms responsible for the infection. We performed a descriptive statistical analysis of the variables. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to compare patients with E cloacae infection to patients with infection caused by other microorganisms.
Results:
A total of 65 patients were included. A predominance of polymicrobial infections (24.62%), followed by infections caused by S aureus (23.07%) and E cloacae (23.07%) was observed. When E cloacae isolated in polymicrobial infections were added, the incidence of E cloacae as a causative microorganism increased to 32.3%. Patients with E cloacae infection were older (64/53, P = .008) and had a higher requirement of negative-pressure therapy after surgical debridement (71%/40%, P = .017).
Conclusion:
A high incidence of E cloacae infections was observed. Patients with E cloacae infection were generally older and required a higher use of negative-pressure therapy after debridement.
Level of Evidence:
Level V, mechanism-based reasoningr.
Purpose: While tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex are exceptionally rare. Our ...objective is to perform a retrospective search of new cases of this disease and analyze all cases available in the literature of tuberculous PJIs, aiming to detect factors that may influence patient outcomes. Methods: The ESGIAI and ESGMYC study groups were used to collect information on non-published cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Additionally, a literature review of all published cases of tuberculous PJIs was conducted. All identified cases in the retrospective study and in the literature review were merged and included in the statistical analysis, involving both univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Fifteen previously unreported cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) from four countries were detailed. Among them, ten patients were female, with a median age of 76 years. The hip was affected in 13 cases. Seven patients experienced co-infection with another microorganism. Treatment approaches varied, with 13 patients undergoing implant removal, one treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), and one case was treated with an unknown treatment method. All patients received antibiotic therapy and achieved a cure. The literature review that was conducted detected 155 published cases. Univariate analysis revealed a statistical significance for previous tuberculosis, joint, and no importance of surgery for cure. Conclusions: Tuberculous prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare condition, typically presenting as a localized chronic infection. Antibiotic treatment is essential for the management of these patients, but neither surgical treatment nor duration of treatment seems to have importance in the outcome.
Despite recent advances during the last few years, microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections remains a challenge. Molecular biology techniques have been developed to try to overcome ...this problem, and recently, many of them have become available for many laboratories. Some of them, especially commercial multiplex PCR-based assays and universal 16S rDNA homemade PCR assays, are now available in many laboratories. Moreover, new technologies have appeared, especially metagenomics and next-generation sequencing. These techniques have demonstrated their potential in many studies but appear to be experimental at present. A few studies have evaluated the possible use of these methods in the clinical routine, and a review of the critical aspects for the selection of a molecular method (accuracy, complexity, cost) was performed. Finally, a proposal for a protocol that includes molecular biology techniques was made according to the literature published in this field. In conclusion, molecular biology techniques are ready to be used in the clinical routine of a microbiology laboratory, but their use must be carried out in accordance with the many special characteristics of each laboratory. In all cases, the interpretation of the results must be conducted by a multidisciplinary team with experience in the management of these patients.
Despite the implications of trochanteric and subtrochanteric intramedullary (IM) nail infection for patients with hip fracture, little is known about risk factors for therapeutic failure and ...mortality in this population. We performed a retrospective observational analysis including patients diagnosed with trochanteric and subtrochanteric IM nail infection at a Spanish academic hospital during a 10-year period, with a minimum follow-up of 22 months. Of 4044 trochanteric and subtrochanteric IM nail implants, we identified 35 cases of infection during the study period (0.87%), 17 of which were chronic infections. Patients with therapeutic failure (n = 10) presented a higher average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (5.40 vs. 4.21,
0.015, CI 0.26-2.13) and higher rates of polymicrobial (OR 5.70,
0.033, CI 1.14-28.33) and multidrug-resistant (OR 7.00,
0.027, CI 1.24-39.57) infections. Upon multivariate analysis, polymicrobial infection and the presence of multidrug-resistant pathogens were identified as independent risk factors for therapeutic failure. Implant retention was associated with an increased risk of failure in chronic infection and was found to be an independent risk factor for overall one-year mortality in the multivariate analysis. Our study highlights the importance of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics as initial treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric IM nail-associated infection while awaiting microbiological results. It also provides initial evidence for the importance of implant removal in chronic IM-nail infection.
Abstract
Background
Cutibacterium species are common pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). These infections are often treated with β-lactams or clindamycin as monotherapy, or in ...combination with rifampin. Clinical evidence supporting the value of adding rifampin for treatment of Cutibacterium PJI is lacking.
Methods
In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated patients with Cutibacterium PJI and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined by the absence of infection relapse or new infection. We used Fisher’s exact tests and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the effect of rifampin and other factors on clinical success after PJI.
Results
We included 187 patients (72.2% male, median age 67 years) with a median follow-up of 36 months. The surgical intervention was a 2-stage exchange in 95 (50.8%), 1-stage exchange in 51 (27.3%), debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in 34 (18.2%), and explantation without reimplantation in 7 (3.7%) patients. Rifampin was included in the antibiotic regimen in 81 (43.3%) cases. Infection relapse occurred in 28 (15.0%), and new infection in 13 (7.0%) cases. In the time-to-event analysis, DAIR (adjusted hazard ratio HR = 2.15, P = .03) and antibiotic treatment over 6 weeks (adjusted HR = 0.29, P = .0002) significantly influenced treatment failure. We observed a tentative evidence for a beneficial effect of adding rifampin to the antibiotic treatment—though not statistically significant for treatment failure (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .07) and not for relapses (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .10).
Conclusions
We conclude that a rifampin combination is not markedly superior in Cutibacterium PJI, but a dedicated prospective multicenter study is needed.
In this retrospective study, we observed no significant benefit of using rifampin to avoid relapses or new infections but a benefit when the prosthesis was removed or exchanged and an antibiotic treatment was given for at least 6 weeks.
is a coagulase-negative staphylococci that is considered normal skin microbiota. It has been described as a cause of soft tissue infections but is not a common micro-organism as the cause of ...orthopedic surgery-related infections. This study describes the characteristics, treatment, and results of musculoskeletal infection by
treated in our institution.
We performed a descriptive, retrospective observational study. Clinical records of all musculoskeletal infections treated in our department between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed. We selected those patients with a positive monomicrobial culture for
. Risk factors for infection, patient's medical records, previous surgery performed, time from surgery to infection, culture antibiogram, antibiotic and surgical treatment for the infection, and recovery rate were registered for the analysis.
Of the 1,482 patients with musculoskeletal infections diagnosed in our institution, 22 had a monomicrobial positive culture of
after an orthopedic surgery representing 1.5% of all orthopedic infections. Ten patients underwent arthroplasty, six underwent fractures synthesis, three had foot surgeries, two had anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, and one had spine surgery. All patients needed surgery and antibiotic treatment with a mean of two surgeries. The most used antibiotic scheme was levofloxacin-rifampicin. The mean follow-up was 36 months. Ninety-six percent of the patients achieved a complete clinical and analytical recovery.
Although musculoskeletal infections caused by
are not common, we have observed a statistically significant incidence increase of
in recent years. If managed with appropriately aggressive surgical treatment and correct antibiotic therapy, good results can be obtained.
The development of sonication protocols over the last few years has improved the sensitivity of conventional cultures for the diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection (PJI). However, the development ...of a new, specifically designed kit for the molecular diagnosis of PJI could provide a major improvement in this field.
Prostheses retrieved from patients who underwent implant removal from May 2014 to May 2015 were sent for culture, and processed according to a previously defined protocol that included sonication. Furthermore, 180 microlitres of sonication fluid were used to carry out the multiplex PCR test (Unyvero i60 system
). A comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value, was performed. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee.
The analysis included 88 prostheses from 68 patients (1.29 prostheses/patient). The type of prostheses studied were knee (n=55), total hip (n=26), partial hip (n=5), and shoulder (n=2). Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed with a PJI (15 delayed, 12 acute, and 2 haematogenous infections). In 24 cases, the result of the PCR was positive, all but 1 corresponding to patients with clinical criteria of PJI. Nine resistance mechanisms were detected from 5 samples. The Unyvero i60 system
showed slightly better results than traditional culture in terms of specificity and PPV.
The Unyvero i60 system
may play a role in rapid diagnosis of PJI, due to its high specificity and PPV. However, despite these results, cultures have to be performed to detect organisms not detected by the system.
PDF
