In this review, we detail the efforts performed to couple the purification and the immobilization of industrial enzymes in a single step. The use of antibodies, the development of specific domains ...with affinity for some specific supports will be revised. Moreover, we will discuss the use of domains that increase the affinity for standard matrices (ionic exchangers, silicates). We will show how the control of the immobilization conditions may convert some unspecific supports in largely specific ones. The development of tailor-made heterofunctional supports as a tool to immobilize–stabilize–purify some proteins will be discussed in deep, using low concentration of adsorbent groups and a dense layer of groups able to give an intense multipoint covalent attachment. The final coupling of mutagenesis and tailor made supports will be the last part of the review.
•Use of immobilized antibodies to get the one step immobilization–purification•Use of domains with specific affinity for some ligands to immobilize/purify tagged proteins•Immobilization/purification by using of domains that increase the enzyme affinity for standard supports•Glyoxyl supports and one step immobilization–purification of multimeric proteins•Medium engineering and standard supports for immobilization/purification•Tailor made heterofunctional supports for large protein immobilization/purification
Lipases are the most widely used enzymes in biocatalysis, and the most utilized method for enzyme immobilization is using hydrophobic supports at low ionic strength. This method allows the one step ...immobilization, purification, stabilization, and hyperactivation of lipases, and that is the main cause of their popularity. This review focuses on these lipase immobilization supports. First, the advantages of these supports for lipase immobilization will be presented and the likeliest immobilization mechanism (interfacial activation on the support surface) will be revised. Then, its main shortcoming will be discussed: enzyme desorption under certain conditions (such as high temperature, presence of cosolvents or detergent molecules). Methods to overcome this problem include physical or chemical crosslinking of the immobilized enzyme molecules or using heterofunctional supports. Thus, supports containing hydrophobic acyl chain plus epoxy, glutaraldehyde, ionic, vinylsulfone or glyoxyl groups have been designed. This prevents enzyme desorption and improved enzyme stability, but it may have some limitations, that will be discussed and some additional solutions will be proposed (e.g., chemical amination of the enzyme to have a full covalent enzyme-support reaction). These immobilized lipases may be subject to unfolding and refolding strategies to reactivate inactivated enzymes. Finally, these biocatalysts have been used in new strategies for enzyme coimmobilization, where the most stable enzyme could be reutilized after desorption of the least stable one after its inactivation.
•Lipases immobilization on hydrophobic supports via interfacial activation is described in this review•This protocol permits the one step immobilization, purification, stabilization and hyperactivation of lipases•Lipases may be released from the support under certain conditions•Intermolecular crosslinking may prevent enzyme release•Heterofunctional supports prevent enzyme release but they have some limitations•There are many ways of taking full advantage of the new heterofunctional supports
Processes involving lipases in obtaining active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are crucial to increase the sustainability of the industry. Despite their lower production cost, microbial lipases ...are striking for their versatile catalyzing reactions beyond their physiological role. In the context of taking advantage of microbial lipases in reactions for the synthesis of API building blocks, this review focuses on: (i) the structural origins of the catalytic properties of microbial lipases, including the results of techniques such as single particle monitoring (SPT) and the description of its selectivity beyond the Kazlauskas rule as the “Mirror-Image Packing” or the “Key Region(s) rule influencing enantioselectivity” (KRIE); (ii) immobilization methods given the conferred operative advantages in industrial applications and their modulating capacity of lipase properties; and (iii) a comprehensive description of microbial lipases use as a conventional or promiscuous catalyst in key reactions in the organic synthesis (Knoevenagel condensation, Morita–Baylis–Hillman (MBH) reactions, Markovnikov additions, Baeyer–Villiger oxidation, racemization, among others). Finally, this review will also focus on a research perspective necessary to increase microbial lipases application development towards a greener industry.
► CALB has been reversibly immobilized on octyl Sepharose at different rates. ► Different percentages of the amino groups in the enzyme have been modified with glutaraldehyde. ► Rapidly immobilized ...enzyme presented mainly aggregates after modification. ► Slowly immobilized CALB presented mainly monomers after modification. ► Enzyme activity and stability were increased by the modification.
Lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB) has been immobilized on octyl-agarose in two ways: rapidly, in 5mM sodium phosphate (85% immobilization yield after 30min), or slowly, in the presence of 30% (v/v) ethanol (40% immobilization yield after 30min). Both biocatalysts were treated with glutaraldehyde in order to obtain different modification degrees on their amino groups (25, 50 and 100% modification). SDS-PAGE and detergent desorption experiments showed that, when the immobilization was performed in absence of ethanol, very large aggregates were formed by intermolecular crosslinking, while when 30% ethanol was added during immobilization, almost 90% of the enzyme remained as a monomer. The stability of both derivatives improved upon modification, both in thermal inactivation experiments (at pHs 5, 7 and 9) or in the presence of 50% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide, achieving stabilization values ranging between 5 and 20 depending on the inactivation conditions. The stability increased proportionally with the modification degree, and was also higher when intermolecular bonds were performed (by a 2–4 factor). Moreover, the activity/pH profile was completely altered after enzyme modification, and, under certain conditions, the activity of the modified biocatalysts doubled that of the non-modified immobilized CALB. Results show that the addition of ethanol permits to have a distance between enzyme molecules that did not allow intermolecular crosslinking, and this has permitted to distinguish between the effects of intramolecular glutaraldehyde modifications and intermolecular glutaraldehyde crosslinking. The simple and controlled treatment of CALB-octyl with glutaraldehyde has proved to be an effective way to obtain a biocatalyst with improved activity and stability under different conditions.
Ficin extract has been immobilized on different 4% aminated-agarose beads. Using just ion exchange, immobilization yield was poor and expressed activity did not surpass 10% of the offered enzyme, ...with no significant effects on enzyme stability. The treatment with glutaraldehyde of this ionically exchanged enzyme produced an almost full enzyme inactivation. Using aminated supports activated with glutaraldehyde, immobilization was optimal at pH 7 (at pH 5 immobilization yield was 80%, while at pH 9, the immobilized enzyme became inactivated). At pH 7, full immobilization was accomplished maintaining 40% activity versus a small synthetic substrate and 30% versus casein. Ficin stabilization upon immobilization could be observed but it depended on the inactivation pH and the substrate employed, suggesting the complexity of the mechanism of inactivation of the immobilized enzyme. The maximum enzyme loading on the support was determined to be around 70 mg/g. The loading has no significant effect on the enzyme stability or enzyme activity using the synthetic substrate but it had a significant effect on the activity using casein; the biocatalysts activity greatly decreased using more than 30 mg/g, suggesting that the near presence of other immobilized enzyme molecules may generate some steric hindrances for the casein hydrolysis.
We present the synthesis of a cross-linking enzyme aggregate (CLEAS) of a peroxidase from Megathyrsus maximus (Guinea Grass) (GGP). The biocatalyst was produced using 50%v/v ethanol and 0.88%w/v ...glutaraldehyde for 1 h under stirring. The immobilization yield was 93.74% and the specific activity was 36.75 U mg−1. The biocatalyst surpassed by 61% the free enzyme activity at the optimal pH value (pH 6 for both preparations), becoming this increase in activity almost 10-fold at pH 9. GGP-CLEAS exhibited a higher thermal stability (2–4 folds) and was more stable towards hydrogen peroxide than the free enzyme (2–3 folds). GGP-CLEAS removes over 80% of 0.05 mM indigo carmine at pH 5, in the presence of 0.55 mM H2O2 after 60 min of reaction, a much higher value than when using the free enzyme. The operational stability showed a decrease of enzyme activity (over 60% in 4 cycles), very likely related to suicide inhibition.
Two different heterofunctional octyl-amino supports have been prepared using ethylenediamine and hexylendiamine (OCEDA and OCHDA) and utilized to immobilize five lipases (lipases A (CALA) and B ...(CALB) from Candida antarctica, lipases from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL), from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and from Candida rugosa (CRL) and the phospholipase Lecitase Ultra (LU). Using pH 5 and 50 mM sodium acetate, the immobilizations proceeded via interfacial activation on the octyl layer, after some ionic bridges were established. These supports did not release enzyme when incubated at Triton X-100 concentrations that released all enzyme molecules from the octyl support. The octyl support produced significant enzyme hyperactivation, except for CALB. However, the activities of the immobilized enzymes were usually slightly higher using the new supports than the octyl ones. Thermal and solvent stabilities of LU and TLL were significantly improved compared to the OC counterparts, while in the other enzymes the stability decreased in most cases (depending on the pH value). As a general rule, OCEDA had lower negative effects on the stability of the immobilized enzymes than OCHDA and while in solvent inactivation the enzyme molecules remained attached to the support using the new supports and were released using monofunctional octyl supports, in thermal inactivations this only occurred in certain cases.
PDF
