To examine patterns and recent trends in multiclass psychotropic treatment among youth visits to office-based physicians in the United States.
Annual data from the 1996-2007 National Ambulatory ...Medical Care Surveys were analyzed to examine patterns and trends in multiclass psychotropic treatment within a nationally representative sample of 3,466 child and adolescent visits to office-based physicians in which a psychotropic medication was prescribed.
There was an increase in the percentage of child visits in which psychotropic medications were prescribed that included at least two psychotropic classes. Across the 12 year period, multiclass psychotropic treatment rose from 14.3% of child psychotropic visits (1996-1999) to 20.2% (2004-2007) (adjusted odds ratio AOR = 1.89, 95% confidence interval CI = 1.22-2.94, p < .01). Among medical visits in which a current mental disorder was diagnosed, the percentage with multiclass psychotropic treatment increased from 22.2% (1996-1999) to 32.2% (2004-2007) (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.42-3.52, p < .001). Over time, there were significant increases in multiclass psychotropic visits in which ADHD medications, antidepressants, or antipsychotics were prescribed, and a decrease in those visits in which mood stabilizers were prescribed. There were also specific increases in co-prescription of ADHD medications and antipsychotic medications (AOR = 6.22, 95% CI = 2.82-13.70, p < .001) and co-prescription of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications (AOR = 5.77, 95% CI = 2.88-11.60, p < .001).
Although little is known about the safety and efficacy of regimens that involve concomitant use of two or more psychotropic agents for children and adolescents, multiclass psychotropic pharmacy is becoming increasingly common in outpatient practice.
Disasters and Youth Furr, Jami M; Comer, Jonathan S; Edmunds, Julie M ...
Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,
12/2010, Volume:
78, Issue:
6
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
Objective:
Meta-analyze the literature on posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms in youths post-disaster.
Method:
Meta-analytic synthesis of the literature (
k
= 96 studies;
N
total
= 74,154) ...summarizing the magnitude of associations between disasters and youth PTS, and key factors associated with variations in the magnitude of these associations. We included peer-reviewed studies published prior to 1/1/2009 that quantitatively examined youth PTS (≤18 years at event) after a distinct and identifiable disaster.
Results:
Despite variability across studies, disasters had a significant effect on youth PTS (small-to-medium magnitude;
r
pooled
= .19,
SE
r
= .03;
d
= 0.4). Female gender (
r
pooled
= .14), higher death toll (disasters of death toll ≤25:
r
pooled
= .09; vs. disasters with ≥1,000 deaths:
r
pooled
= .22), child proximity (
r
pooled
= .33), personal loss (
r
pooled
= .16), perceived threat (
r
pooled
= .34), and distress (
r
pooled
= .38) at time of event were each associated with increased PTS. Studies conducted within 1 year post-disaster, studies that used established measures, and studies that relied on child-report data identified a significant effect.
Conclusion:
Youths are vulnerable to appreciable PTS after disaster, with pre-existing child characteristics, aspects of the disaster experience, and study methodology each associated with variations in the effect magnitude. Findings underscore the importance of measurement considerations in post-disaster research. Areas in need of research include the long-term impact of disasters, disaster-related media exposure, prior trauma and psychopathology, social support, ethnicity/race, prejudice, parental psychopathology, and the effects of disasters in developing regions of the world. Policy and clinical implications are discussed.
•Telehealth is not new, but has now entered the clinical mainstream.•The pandemic has prompted unprecedented agility and innovation in practice.•The articles in this issue outline some of these most ...promising innovations.•Cautions for post-pandemic telehealth practice are provided.•Focused efforts are needed to use telehealth to reach underserved populations.
Across the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed perhaps the field’s largest and most abrupt transformation in scope of practice. In the context of surging mental health needs and historically limited feasibility of traditional office-based services during the pandemic, telehealth has launched into the clinical mainstream and has become a dominant mode of outpatient mental health care delivery. The articles in this terrific Special Issue outline some of the field’s most exciting innovations from the past 18 months. The present commentary discusses how these unprecedented times have prompted unprecedented resourcefulness and innovation in the field. Issues related to evolving and uncertain telehealth regulation and reimbursement policies are discussed, and cautions for the road ahead are offered as we prepare for post-pandemic practices. The commentary concludes with a call to redouble efforts to move beyond the use of telehealth to largely treat only those populations who already enjoyed access to traditional office-based services. Understanding and overcoming barriers to telehealth care and ensuring equitable access to telehealth options are critical steps for actualizing the great potential of telehealth strategies for increasing the reach of supported care to underserved populations.
Children raised in families with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to exhibit symptoms of psychopathology. However, the strength of this association, the specific indices of SES most ...strongly associated with childhood psychopathology, and factors moderating the association are strikingly inconsistent across studies. We conducted a meta-analysis of 120 estimates of the association between family SES and child psychopathology in 13 population-representative cohorts of children studied in the US since 1980. Among 26,715 participants aged 3–19 years, we observed small to moderate associations of low family income (g = 0.19), low Hollingshead index (g = 0.21), low subjective SES (g = 0.24), low parental education (g = 0.25), poverty status (g = 0.25), and receipt of public assistance (g = 0.32) with higher levels of childhood psychopathology. Moderator testing revealed that receipt of public assistance showed an especially strong association with psychopathology and that SES was more strongly related to externalizing than internalizing psychopathology. Dispersion in our final, random effects, model suggested that the relation between SES and child psychopathology is likely to vary in different populations of children and in different communities. These findings highlight the need for additional research on the mechanisms of SES-related psychopathology risk in children in order to identify targets for potential intervention.
•In a meta-analysis, youth with lower socioeconomic status had greater psychopathology.•This effect was small and consistent for many indices of socioeconomic status (SES).•Youth with indicators of serious financial hardship had the most psychopathology.•SES was more strongly related to behavior problems than depression or anxiety.
Anxiety disorders are collectively the most prevalent mental health problems affecting youth. To increase the reach of mental health care, recent years have seen increasing enthusiasm surrounding ...mobile platforms for expanding treatment delivery options. Apps developed in academia and supported in clinical trials are slow to reach the consumer marketplace. Meanwhile, proliferation of industry-developed apps on consumer marketplaces has been high. The present study analyzed content within mobile products prominently marketed toward consumers for anxiety in youth. Systematic inventory of the Google Play Store and Apple Store using keyword searches for child and adolescent anxiety yielded 121 apps, which were evaluated on the basis of their descriptive characteristics, mobile functionalities, and adherence to evidence-based treatment principles. Findings revealed that evidence-based treatment content within the sample is scant and few comprehensive anxiety self-management apps were identified. Advanced features that leverage the broader functionalities of smartphone capabilities (e.g., sensors, ecological momentary assessments) were rarely present. Findings underscore the need to increase the prominence and accessibility of quality child anxiety intervention products for consumers. Strategies for improving marketing of supported apps to better penetrate consumer markets are discussed.
•We analyzed the quality and scope of consumer-marketed apps for youth anxiety•We found that evidence-based content within a systematic sample of apps was scant•Features that engage advanced functionalities of smartphones were rarely present•Findings underscore the need to better disseminate quality child anxiety apps
Mental illness imposes a staggering public health burden in the United States. Although the past 40 years have witnessed tremendous advances in the identification of evidence-based practices (EBPs) ...in psychological treatments, gaps persist between treatment in experimental settings and services available in the community. In response, considerable attention and large financial commitments have focused in recent years on broad dissemination and implementation efforts designed to improve the quality of psychological services delivered by a variety of generalist practitioners across practice settings. Increasingly, under the influence of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it is envisioned that these generalists will practice in integrated primary care settings. These advances hold enormous potential, and yet, given the tremendous diversity of mental health problems and human suffering, broad dissemination and implementation efforts to generalists alone may not be sufficient to adequately address the burden of mental illness. Some EBPs may prove too complex for universal dissemination, and the time and expense required for quality dissemination and implementation preclude large-scale training in the treatment of low base rate disorders. As dissemination and implementation efforts work to ensure a quality generalist mental health care workforce, herein we highlight the vital need for available specialty care in the delivery of psychological treatments. Given traditional barriers that interfere with the accessibility of specialty care, we propose the transformative potential of a specialty behavioral telehealth care workforce, transacting with the generalist practitioner workforce to collectively ensure the highest quality and timely delivery of needed treatments to affected individuals.
Objective: Despite effective treatment options, many families-especially those from marginalized backgrounds-lack access to quality care for their children's behavioral difficulties. Since the ...COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become a prominent format for the delivery of outpatient services, with potential to increase access to quality care. Although telehealth-delivered parenting interventions are associated with positive clinical outcomes, limited research has examined whether telehealth formats improve treatment engagement relative to office-based care. The present study is the first controlled comparison of engagement across office-based parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) and internet-delivered PCIT (iPCIT). Method: Children ages 3-5 years, and their caregiver(s) (N = 40) participated in a randomized trial comparing iPCIT to office-based PCIT in the treatment of behavioral problems. Analyses examined the effects of treatment format on engagement (i.e., missed sessions, premature treatment discontinuation, homework completion, therapeutic alliance, and treatment satisfaction). Logistic and linear regressions further explored whether treatment format moderated the effects of common predictors of treatment engagement (i.e., family economic means, racial/ethnic background, caregiver stress). Results: iPCIT improved attendance rates relative to office-based PCIT, especially for families from minoritized racial/ethnic backgrounds. At the same time, among families with relatively higher levels of caregiver stress, office-based PCIT was associated with lower dropout rates and improved treatment alliance and satisfaction, relative to iPCIT. Conclusions: This study provides the first experimental support that telehealth formats can improve treatment attendance in behavioral parenting interventions. Findings highlight nuances in treatment engagement across treatment formats that reveal limits to the extent telehealth transcends engagement concerns.
What is the public health significance of this article?
This study provides the first controlled trial supporting the potential for telehealth to improve session attendance in a behavioral parenting intervention, especially for racially or ethnically minoritized individuals. This study also demonstrated that there are nuances in whether telehealth or office-based services are preferred for improving engagement in mental health treatment.
The controlled evaluation of treatments for early childhood anxiety and related problems has been a relatively recent area of investigation, and accordingly, trials examining early childhood anxiety ...treatment have not been well represented in existing systematic reviews of youth anxiety treatments. This Evidence Base Update provides the first systematic review of evidence supporting interventions specifically for the treatment of early childhood anxiety and related problems. Thirty articles testing 38 treatments in samples with mean age < 7.9 years (N = 2,228 children) met inclusion criteria. We applied Southam-Gerow and Prinstein's (2014) review criteria, which classifies families of treatments according to one of five levels of empirical support-Well-Established, Probably Efficacious, Possibly Efficacious, Experimental, and of Questionable Efficacy. We found family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to be a Well-Established treatment, and Group Parent CBT and Group Parent CBT + Group Child CBT to both be Probably Efficacious treatments. In contrast, play therapy and attachment-based therapy are still only Experimental treatments for early childhood anxiety, relaxation training has Questionable Efficacy, and there is no evidence to date to speak to the efficacy of individual child CBT and/or medication in younger anxious children. All 3 currently supported interventions for early childhood anxiety entail exposure-based CBT with significant parental involvement. This conclusion meaningfully differs from conclusions for treating anxiety in older childhood that highlight the well-established efficacy of individual child CBT and/or medication and that question whether parental involvement in treatment enhances outcomes.
Most research on irritability and child psychopathology has focused on depressive disorders, bipolar disorder, and/or oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Less is known about relationships between ...child anxiety and irritability and moderators of such associations.
Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine associations between anxiety severity and irritability in a large sample of treatment-seeking youth with anxiety disorders (N = 663, aged 7-19 years, mean = 12.25 years), after accounting for comorbid depressive disorders and ODD. Additional analyses examined whether associations were moderated by child gender, age, and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) status.
There was a direct link between child anxiety and irritability even after accounting for comorbid depressive disorders and ODD. Links between child anxiety and irritability were robust across child gender and age. Furthermore, relationships between child anxiety and irritability were comparable across youth with and without GAD, suggesting that the anxiety-irritability link is relevant across child anxiety disorders and not confined to youth with GAD.
Findings add to an increasing body of evidence linking child irritability to a range of internalizing and externalizing psychopathologies, and suggest that child anxiety assessment should systematically incorporate irritability evaluations. Moreover, youth in clinical settings displaying irritability should be assessed for the presence of anxiety. Treatments for childhood anxiety may do well to incorporate new treatment modules as needed that specifically target problems of irritability.
Service use trends showing increased off-label prescribing in very young children and reduced psychotherapy use raise concerns about quality of care for early disruptive behavior problems. ...Meta-analysis can empirically clarify best practices and guide clinical decision making by providing a quantitative synthesis of a body of literature, identifying the magnitude of overall effects across studies, and determining systematic factors associated with effect variations.
We used random-effects meta-analytic procedures to empirically evaluate the overall effect of psychosocial treatments on early disruptive behavior problems, as well as potential moderators of treatment response. Thirty-six controlled trials, evaluating 3,042 children, met selection criteria (mean sample age, 4.7 years; 72.0% male; 33.1% minority youth).
Psychosocial treatments collectively demonstrated a large and sustained effect on early disruptive behavior problems (Hedges' g = 0.82), with the largest effects associated with behavioral treatments (Hedges' g = 0.88), samples with higher proportions of older and male youth, and comparisons against treatment as usual (Hedges' g = 1.17). Across trials, effects were largest for general externalizing problems (Hedges' g = 0.90) and problems of oppositionality and noncompliance (Hedges' g = 0.76), and were weakest, relatively speaking, for problems of impulsivity and hyperactivity (Hedges' g = 0.61).
In the absence of controlled trials evaluating psychotropic interventions, findings provide robust quantitative support that psychosocial treatments should constitute first-line treatment for early disruptive behavior problems. Against a backdrop of concerning trends in the availability and use of supported interventions, findings underscore the urgency of improving dissemination efforts for supported psychosocial treatment options, and removing systematic barriers to psychosocial care for affected youth.
PDF
