Summary Background Palbociclib (PD-0332991) is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6 with preclinical evidence of growth-inhibitory activity in oestrogen ...receptor-positive breast cancer cells and synergy with anti-oestrogens. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of patients with advanced, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods In this open-label, randomised phase 2 study, postmenopausal women with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer who had not received any systemic treatment for their advanced disease were eligible to participate. Patients were enrolled in two separate cohorts that accrued sequentially: in cohort 1, patients were enrolled on the basis of their oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative biomarker status alone, whereas in cohort 2 they were also required to have cancers with amplification of cyclin D1 ( CCND1 ), loss of p16 (INK4A or CDKN2A), or both. In both cohorts, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 via an interactive web-based randomisation system, stratified by disease site and disease-free interval, to receive continuous oral letrozole 2·5 mg daily or continuous oral letrozole 2·5 mg daily plus oral palbociclib 125 mg, given once daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off over 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Accrual to cohort 2 was stopped after an unplanned interim analysis of cohort 1 and the statistical analysis plan for the primary endpoint was amended to a combined analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 (instead of cohort 2 alone). The study is ongoing but closed to accrual; these are the results of the final analysis of progression-free survival. The study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00721409. Findings Between Dec 22, 2009, and May 12, 2012, we randomly assigned 165 patients, 84 to palbociclib plus letrozole and 81 to letrozole alone. At the time of the final analysis for progression-free survival (median follow-up 29·6 months 95% CI 27·9–36·0 for the palbociclib plus letrozole group and 27·9 months 25·5–31·1 for the letrozole group), 41 progression-free survival events had occurred in the palbociclib plus letrozole group and 59 in the letrozole group. Median progression-free survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 5·7–12·6) for the letrozole group and 20·2 months (13·8–27·5) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0·488, 95% CI 0·319–0·748; one-sided p=0·0004). In cohort 1 (n=66), median progression-free survival was 5·7 months (2·6–10·5) for the letrozole group and 26·1 months (11·2–not estimable) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0·299, 0·156–0·572; one-sided p<0·0001); in cohort 2 (n=99), median progression-free survival was 11·1 months (7·1–16·4) for the letrozole group and 18·1 months (13·1–27·5) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0·508, 0·303–0·853; one-sided p=0·0046). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was reported in 45 (54%) of 83 patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole group versus one (1%) of 77 patients in the letrozole group, leucopenia in 16 (19%) versus none, and fatigue in four (4%) versus one (1%). Serious adverse events that occurred in more than one patient in the palbociclib plus letrozole group were pulmonary embolism (three 4% patients), back pain (two 2%), and diarrhoea (two 2%). No cases of febrile neutropenia or neutropenia-related infections were reported during the study. 11 (13%) patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole group and two (2%) in the letrozole group discontinued the study because of adverse events. Interpretation The addition of palbociclib to letrozole in this phase 2 study significantly improved progression-free survival in women with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. A phase 3 trial is currently underway. Funding Pfizer.
Summary Increased gene copy number (high polysomy or amplification) of EGFR and HER2 has evolved as a predictor for response to targeted therapy. STAT3 and the apoptosis inhibitor survivin represent ...distinct oncogenes in various human neoplasms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate protein and gene status of these biomarkers by immunohistochemistry and dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays of 286 salivary gland carcinomas in the context of clinical and histopathologic characteristics. Diverse tumor types showed overexpression and increased gene copy number of EGFR and HER2 . Amplification of HER2 was found in 35.5% of salivary duct carcinomas. Protein overexpression was strongly associated with high gene copy number for both EGFR and HER2 ( P < .001). Overexpression and increased gene copy number of EGFR and HER2 were correlated to high-grade malignancy ( P < .001) and unfavorable prognosis ( P < .001). Strong nuclear staining of survivin was found in 18.9% of tumors and was associated with high-grade malignancy ( P < .001), overexpression, and high gene copy number of EGFR and HER2 ( P ≤ .05) as well as unfavorable prognosis ( P < .001). Overexpression of nuclear pSTAT3 was found in 28.3% of tumors and correlated with well tumor differentiation ( P < .001) and favorable prognosis ( P = .001). Loss or weak expression of pSTAT3 was inversely associated with overexpression of survivin ( P < .001) as well as overexpression and high gene copy number of EGFR and HER2 ( P < .05). Overall, overexpression and increased gene copy number of EGFR and HER2 characterize high-grade malignancy with unfavorable prognosis in salivary gland cancer. Nuclear survivin typifies aggressive tumors with worse prognosis, whereas nuclear pSTAT3 might play a role as a tumor suppressor in absence of EGFR, HER2, and survivin.
Summary Purpose To study implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients with focus on implant survival and quality of life. Materials and Methods The prospective ...observational study presents preliminary results of 29 edentulous head neck cancer patients (20 patients after radiotherapy) with 165 OsseoSpeed implants. Implant success after 1-year follow-up was evaluated by means of the Albrektsson criteria. Quality of life was analysed with the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, and OHIP 14 questionnaires. Results The overall implant survival rate after 1 year was 95.2% (157/165). Implant success measured by the Albrektsson criteria showed a lower success rate of 86.7% (143/165), mainly because of peri-implant marginal bone loss with a mean of 0.8 mm after 1 year. Xerostomia (p=0.008), implant insertion within the radiation target volume (p=0.09), implantation in transplanted bone (p=0.05), and smoking (p=0.041) were the main reasons for implant failure, followed by D4 bone quality, maxillary implant site, and insufficient primary stability. Speaking, swallowing, eating, as well as social integration and individual self-confidence had considerably improved 1 year after denture placement compared to before treatment. Conclusion Implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients is possible at a calculable risk and significantly improves patients' quality of life.
