When self-related health (SRH) is under threat, people may use self-enhancement through social comparison to buffer against the threat. Because SRH is under greater threat among older than among ...younger adults, the benefit of social comparison on SRH may be greater for them. To test this, Study 1 examined ratings on physical attributes for self and “someone of the same age” among 592 Hong Kong Chinese, across young, middle, and old age. Findings suggested that perceiving one's physical self as better than others produced a larger gain in self-rated health in older than in younger people. Study 2 showed longitudinally that, among older adults, an increase in physical symptoms over time was associated with a worsening SRH, which was then positively associated with physical self-enhancement. This improved physical self in turn partially recovered the damage to SRH.
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or "treat-and-extend" (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical ...trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice.INTRODUCTIONAnti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or "treat-and-extend" (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice.We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project (FRB). Treatment-naïve eyes starting nAMD treatment with at least three injections using a T&E or PRN regimen were tracked by using the FRB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) measured by the number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 2 years versus baseline. The secondary outcome was the number of injections at 2 years.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project (FRB). Treatment-naïve eyes starting nAMD treatment with at least three injections using a T&E or PRN regimen were tracked by using the FRB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) measured by the number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 2 years versus baseline. The secondary outcome was the number of injections at 2 years.From January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2019, 3313 eyes from 2948 patients with nAMD were included: 1243 eyes from 1065 patients were classified as PRN and 2070 eyes from 1935 patients started a T&E regimen. At 24 months, patients on the T&E regimen experienced significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) improvement in VA than those on PRN (+ 4.2 3.1, 5.2 vs. + 1.3 0.1, 2.6 letters; p < 0.001), with more injections (14.9 standard deviation(SD) 4.3) vs. 9.8(SD 4.3); p < 0.001).RESULTSFrom January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2019, 3313 eyes from 2948 patients with nAMD were included: 1243 eyes from 1065 patients were classified as PRN and 2070 eyes from 1935 patients started a T&E regimen. At 24 months, patients on the T&E regimen experienced significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) improvement in VA than those on PRN (+ 4.2 3.1, 5.2 vs. + 1.3 0.1, 2.6 letters; p < 0.001), with more injections (14.9 standard deviation(SD) 4.3) vs. 9.8(SD 4.3); p < 0.001).Eyes treated with a T&E regimen had better VA outcomes from VEGF inhibitors than eyes treated PRN. This large real-world data assessment supports previous data from randomized clinical trials that the T&E regimen delivers better outcomes than PRN.CONCLUSIONSEyes treated with a T&E regimen had better VA outcomes from VEGF inhibitors than eyes treated PRN. This large real-world data assessment supports previous data from randomized clinical trials that the T&E regimen delivers better outcomes than PRN.
Cardioversion (CV) in atrial fibrillation can cause arterial embolism. Effective anticoagulation clearly reduces the risk. In practice, in every third case anticoagulation is not in line with the ...recommendations. Simplification can be achieved, and time gained, by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) due to the shorter anticoagulation period prior to CV, and by use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for anticoagulation. As yet little data is available on LMWH in cardioversion. The aim of this cohort study was to investigate the administration of a LMWH in this indication under everyday clinical conditions.
125 patients treated as inpatients for atrial fibrillation or -flutter received the LMWH Fragmin (dalteparin 2 x 100 anti-Xa units/kg, maximum dosage 2 x 10,000 anti-Xa units subcutaneously). In the presence of a relevant indication, TEE-guided CV was performed. The application of dalteparin was terminated as soon as effective anticoagulation had been achieved from phenprocoumon or once anticoagulation was no longer indicated.
125 patients with atrial fibrillation or -flutter received dalteparin for a median of 11 days (range of 3-41 days). TEE was performed in 39 patients. Five patients revealed a thrombus in the left atrial appendage in the TEE, and one patient died from suspected cerebral embolism over the further course. In the remaining 124 patients, no thromboembolic event was established. Successfully cardioverted were 26 of 34 patients (76%) who had no thrombus in the TEE. Serious adverse effects did not ensue.
Simple, well tolerated and effective anticoagulation is possible with dalteparin in TEE-guided CV. Due to the methodic limitations of a cohort study and the low incidence of emboli, the efficacy of dalteparin in this indication needs to be further confirmed by prospective and randomized studies.
