Using the KEDR detector at the VEPP-4M e+e− collider, we have determined the values of R at thirteen points of the center-of-mass energy between 1.84 and 3.05 GeV. The achieved accuracy is about or ...better than 3.9% at most of the energy points with a systematic uncertainty less than 2.4%.
Using the KEDR detector at the VEPP-4M e+e− collider, we have measured the values of Ruds and R at seven points of the center-of-mass energy between 3.12 and 3.72 GeV. The total achieved accuracy is ...about or better than 3.3% at most of energy points with a systematic uncertainty of about 2.1%. At the moment it is the most accurate measurement of R(s) in this energy range.
We present the analysis of all KEDR data on the determination of J/ψ and ψ(2S) masses. The data comprise six scans of J/ψ and seven scans of ψ(2S) which were performed at the VEPP-4M e+e− collider in ...2002–2008. The beam energy was determined using the resonance depolarization method. The detector and accelerator conditions during scans were very different that increases the reliability of the averaged results. The analysis accounts for partial correlations of systematic uncertainties on the masses. The following mass values were obtained:MJ/ψ=3096.900±0.002±0.006 MeV,Mψ(2S)=3686.099±0.004±0.009 MeV. These results supersede our previous measurements published in 2003 and 2012.
Using the inclusive photon spectrum based on a data sample collected at the J/ψ peak with the KEDR detector at the VEPP-4M e+e− collider, we measured the rate of the radiative decay J/ψ→γηc as well ...as ηc mass and width. Taking into account an asymmetric photon lineshape we obtained Γγηc0=2.98±0.18−0.33+0.15keV, Mηc=2983.5±1.4−3.6+1.6MeV/c2, Γηc=27.2±3.1−2.6+5.4MeV.
We report the final results of a study of the ψ(3770) meson using a data sample collected with the KEDR detector at the VEPP-4M electron–positron collider. The data analysis takes into account ...interference between the resonant and nonresonant DD¯ production, where the latter is related to the nonresonant part of the energy-dependent form factor FD. The vector dominance approach and several empirical parameterizations have been tried for the nonresonant FDNR(s).
Our results for the mass and total width of ψ(3770) areM=3779.2−1.7+1.8−0.7+0.5−0.3+0.3 MeV,Γ=24.9−4.0+4.6−0.6+0.5−0.9+0.2 MeV, where the first, second and third uncertainties are statistical, systematic and model, respectively. For the electron partial width two possible solutions have been found:(1)Γee=154−58+79−9+17−25+13 eV,(2)Γee=414−80+72−26+24−10+90 eV. Our statistics are insufficient to prefer one solution to another. The Solution (2) mitigates the problem of non-DD¯ decays but is disfavored by potential models.
It is shown that taking into account the resonance–continuum interference in the near-threshold region affects resonance parameters, thus the results presented cannot be directly compared with the corresponding PDG values obtained ignoring this effect.
A high-precision determination of the main parameters of the ψ(2S) resonance has been performed with the KEDR detector at the VEPP-4M e+e− collider in three scans of the ψ(2S)–ψ(3770) energy range. ...Fitting the energy dependence of the multihadron cross section in the vicinity of the ψ(2S) we obtained the mass valueM=3686.114±0.007±0.011−0.012+0.002 MeV and the product of the electron partial width by the branching fraction into hadronsΓee×Bh=2.233±0.015±0.037±0.020 keV. The first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. The third uncertainty quoted is an estimate of the model dependence of the result due to assumptions on the interference effects in the cross section of the single-photon e+e− annihilation to hadrons explicitly considered in this work. Implicitly, the same assumptions were employed to obtain the charmonium leptonic width and the absolute branching fractions in many experiments.
Using the result presented and the world average values of the electron and hadron branching fractions, one obtains the electron partial width and the total width of the ψ(2S):Γee=2.282±0.015±0.038±0.021 keV,Γ=296±2±8±3 keV.
These results are consistent with and more than two times more precise than any of the previous experiments.
PDF
