Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are approved for glioblastoma based on improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the phase 3 EF-14 trial of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. ...To test the hypothesis that increasing TTFields dose at the tumor site improves patient outcomes, we performed a simulation-based study investigating the association between TTFields dose and survival (OS and PFS) in patients treated with TTFields in EF-14.
EF-14 patient cases (N = 340) were included. Realistic head models were derived from T1-contrast images captured at baseline. The transducer array layout on each patient was obtained from EF-14 records; average compliance (fraction of time patient was on active treatment) and average electrical current delivered to the patient were derived from log files of the TTFields devices used by patients. TTFields intensity distributions and power densities were calculated using the finite element method. Local minimum dose density (LMiDD) was defined as the product of TTFields intensity, tissue-specific conductivities, and patient compliance. The average LMiDD within a tumor bed comprising the gross tumor volume and the 3-mm-wide peritumoral boundary zone was calculated.
The median OS and PFS were significantly longer when the average LMiDD in the tumor bed was ≥0.77 mW/cm3: OS was 25.2 versus 20.4 months (P = .003, hazard ratio HR = 0.611) and PFS was 8.5 versus 6.7 months (P = .02, HR = 0.699). The median OS and PFS were longer when the average TTFields intensity was >1.06 V/cm: OS was 24.3 versus 21.6 months (P = .03, HR = 0.705) and PFS was 8.1 versus 7.9 months (P = .03, HR = 0.721).
In this study we present the first reported analysis demonstrating patient-level dose responses to TTFields. We provide a rigorous definition for TTFields dose and set a conceptual framework for future work on TTFields dosimetry and treatment planning.
This study aimed to report a single-center experience of three adult subjects receiving ONC201 as part of the ONC018-expanded access clinical trial (NCT03134131). ONC201 is an oral investigational ...antagonist against the D2 dopamine receptor that has shown encouraging results for malignant gliomas harboring the histone H3 lysine 27-to-methionine (H3K27M) mutation in the H3 histone complex. Responses have been reported in pediatric subjects with such tumors. An expanded access clinical trial (ONC018) was available to eligible patients allowing them access to this agent pending FDA review. Our site enrolled three subjects in the ONC018 trial. We present the demographic, clinical, and molecular characteristics of our enrolled subjects. We report the tolerability, adverse events, and outcome measures including survival, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and quality-of-life measured by the MD Anderson symptom inventory instrument (MDASI). Three subjects were registered at our site onto ONC018 with the age range of 18-44 years, two of three were female, residing in Norway, India, and the United States. Tumor locations were brainstem, corpus callosum, and thalamus. Pathology includes glioblastoma (3/3), methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated (2/3), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutant (0/3), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification (0/3), and α thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X‑linked (ATRX) (3/3). Median change from baseline KPS ≤20% decrease; MDASI of 2/3 experienced decrease from baseline (median 6%), consistent with improved quality of life. No clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were found. All adverse events were grades I-II. We found that the study drug was quite tolerable. No serious adverse events nor radiographic responses were seen. Analyses of the larger study cohort and additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to provide insight into the safety and efficacy.
Background Virtual tumor board (VTB) platforms are an important aspect of cancer management. They enable easier access to a multidisciplinary team of experts. To deliver high-quality cancer care, it ...is necessary to coordinate numerous therapies and providers, share technical knowledge, and maintain open lines of communication among all professionals involved. The VTB is an essential tool in the diagnosis and treatment of brain cancer. For patients with glioma and brain metastases, multidisciplinary tumor board guidelines should guide diagnosis and therapy throughout the course of the illness. VTBs are an emerging resource across various cancer care networks in the United States. Methodology We performed a systematic search of all VTBs incorporating a platform designed for this specific role. We reviewed the records of the Genomet VTB, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) VTB, and Xcures VTB. Summary data examined included the year of launch, demographics, characteristics of cases, average response time, advantages, and how they handle protected health information. Results Overall, 30% of VTBs examined were launched in 2017. All had a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online environment. On a review of Xcures records, the median age of the female patients was 57 years and the median age of the male patients was 55 years. The data showed that 44% (4.4 out of every 10 patients) with a confirmed treatment chose the VTB integrated option. Overall, 76% of patients in the Xcures registry had primary central nervous system tumors, with at least 556 patients in the tumor registry which included 46% glioblastoma cases (96% primary, 4% secondary). In the MUSC VTB project, 112 thoracic tumor cases and nine neuro-oncology cases were reviewed. The tumor board met weekly, and the average response time was within 24 hours of case review and presentation. The Genomet VTB de-identifies all patient information; this is a virtual platform primarily focused on neuro-oncology cases. Cases involved a median of five specialists most commonly neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, molecular pathologists, and neuroradiologists. The case review revealed an age range of six months to 84 years (mean age = 44.5 years), with 69.6% males and 30.4% females, 43.5% glioblastomas, 8.7% adenocarcinomas, and 8.7% infratentorial tumors. The average response time observed in all cases was ≤24 hours. Conclusions VTBs allow for quicker expert analysis of cases. This has resulted in an accelerated number of cases reviewed with a shortened communication time. More studies are needed to gain additional insights into user engagement metrics.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To report single center experience of three adult subjects receiving ONC-201 as part of the ONC018 expanded access clinical trial NCT03134131.
BACKGROUND
ONC-201 is an oral ...investigational antagonist against the D2 dopamine receptor that has shown encouraging results for malignant gliomas harboring the H3K27M mutation in the H3 histone complex. Responses have been reported in pediatric subjects with such tumors. An expanded access clinical trial (ONC018) was available to eligible patients allowing them access to this agent pending FDA review. Design/
METHODS
Our site enrolled three subjects on the ONC018 trial. We present the demographic, clinical, and molecular characteristics for our enrolled subjects. We report the tolerability, adverse events, and outcome measures including survival, Karnofsky Performance Status KPS and quality-of-life measured by the MD Anderson symptom inventory instrument MDASI.
RESULTS
Three subjects were registered at our site onto ONC018 with age range 18–44yrs, 2/3 female, residing in Norway, India, and United states. Tumor locations: brainstem, corpus callosum and thalamus. Pathology: Glioblastoma (3/3), MGMT methylated (2/3), IDH1 mutant (0/3), EGFR amplification (0/3) and ATRX (3/3). Median change from baseline KPS: ≤20 % decrease; MDASI:2/3 experienced decrease from baseline median 6%, consistent with improved quality of life. No clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. All adverse events were grade I–II.
CONCLUSIONS
We found that the study drug was quite tolerable. No serious adverse events nor radiographic responses were seen. Analyses of the larger study cohort and additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to provide insight into the safety and efficacy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Virtual tumor board VTB platforms are an important aspect of cancer management. They enable easier access to a multidisciplinary team of experts. In order to deliver ...high-quality cancer care, it is necessary to coordinate numerous therapies and providers, and maintain open lines of communication among all professionals involved. Design/
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of all VTBs incorporating a platform designed for this specific role. We reviewed the records of Genomet, Medical University of South CarolinaMUSC and Xcures virtual tumor boards. Summary data examined include year of launch, demographics, characteristics of cases, average response time, advantages, and how they handle protected health information.
RESULTS
30% of VTBs examined launched in 2017. All had a HIPAA compliant online environment. Xcures records reveals median age of female patients was 57yrs and the median age of male patients was 55 years. The data showed that 44% with a confirmed treatment preferred VTB integrated option. 76% of patients in Xcures registry consist of primary CNS tumors. There are at least 556 patients in the tumor registry which included 46% Glioblastoma cases 96% primary, 4% secondary. MUSC VTB shows 112 thoracic tumor cases and 9 neuro-Oncology cases. Genomet VTB data shows age range from 6 months to 84 years mean age 44.5 years with 69.6% males and 30.4% females, 43.5% glioblastoma, 8.7% adenocarcinoma, 8.7% infratentorial tumor. Average response time observed in all cases was ≤ 24 hours.
CONCLUSION
VTBs allow for quicker expert analysis of cases. More studies are needed to gain additional insight into user engagement metrics.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the various innovative approaches to diagnosing and treating patients presenting with brain tumor-related ...pain.
BACKGROUND
Brain tumors make up for lower than 2% of all cancers, which is heavily linked to high morbidity, deteriorated quality of life, and the death of the affected patients. Glioblastoma (GBM) makes up 38% of the malignant brain glioma.The main treatment approaches for gliomas are widely dependent on chemotherapy and radiation therapy. However, these methods have been associated with vast side effects which constitute the quality of life of the patient.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis conformed to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 3025 studies were assessed through the eligibility criteria to remain with twenty eligible studies. The included studies were then grouped into two categories; group one comprised 14 studies that focused on an innovative approach to diagnosis and treatment of gliomas, and six studies comprised of studies that focused on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with brain tumors.
RESULTS
Twenty studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed independently and in two groups: diagnosis and treatment and quality of life issues of brain tumor patients. In one group, one study revealed a relatively progression-free survival (PFS) going up to 57 weeks and overall survival (OS) time of more than 20 weeks after the initial surgery. Group two indicated HRQoL issues associated with symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, trauma, cognitive and personality dysfunction, leg weakness, and neurological deficits.
CONCLUSION
Timely diagnosis of the gliomas has significant improvements to the overall survival. Treatment approaches explored in the studies include Temozolomide (TZ), Gliadel Wafer, immunogeno-type, peptide vaccination, Bevacizumab, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and Temsirolimus. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been linked to a deteriorated quality of life of the patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The MET pathway is a key oncogenic pathway in gliomas and is involved in tumor survival, angiogenesis, and invasion. MET alterations have been increasingly identified as a ...potential therapeutic target.
METHODS
Our objective was to further characterize the natural history of gliomas which harbor MET alterations and study outcomes as determined by progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
We identified 22 glioma patients seen at our institution between 2015 and 2021 who had a MET alteration confirmed through comprehensive molecular profiling. There were 18 grade 4 astrocytomas/glioblastomas, 3 grade 3 gliomas (2 astrocytomas, 1 oligodendroglioma), and 1 grade 2 glioma (oligodendroglioma). MET amplification was observed in 13 patients and fusion in 16 patients , with 7 patients carrying both amplification and fusion alterations. MET fusion partners included PTPRZ1 (8 patients), CAPZA2 (6 patients), and ST7 (3 patients). Median OS was 12.8 months, and median PFS was 8.47 months. IDH1/2 mutation was associated with significantly improved survival, with an estimated OS of 146 months for IDH1/2 mutant tumors and 17.9 months for IDH1/2 wildtype tumors (p< 0.001), MGMT methylation status had no significant survival impact. No significant survival differences were observed between the fusion only, amplification only, and combined fusion and amplification groups. No therapy was predictive of improved outcomes.
CONCLUSION
MET amplification and fusion alterations were observed in both low and high grade gliomas, suggesting that they may be involved in early tumorigenesis. Survival outcomes were poor compared with historical data, with no differences observed between treatment groups, suggesting that current therapeutic modalities may be inadequate. This study indicates that MET may be an appropriate therapeutic target, laying the groundwork for clinical trials investigating MET-targeted agents.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) have historically had dismal survival rates until the advent of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based chemotherapy regimens. With ...increasing prevalence of autoimmune disease and development of new immunosuppressants, a genetically distinct entity known as iatrogenic immunodeficiency associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) has emerged. Many of these cases arise following methotrexate use, challenging feasibility of standard HD-MTX regimens. The aim of this study was to further characterize this disorder and determine the optimal management strategy.
METHODS
We describe a case of a 76-year-old female with iatrogenic immunodeficiency associated PCNSL successfully treated with surgical resection followed by an antiviral and rituximab based regimen. We then performed a systematic literature review and identified 58 cases of non-transplant iatrogenic immunodeficiency associated LPD involving the CNS. We used a linear probability statistical model to determine correlations with outcome.
RESULTS
Natalizumab was associated with EBV negative tumors (p = 0.023), and EBV positive tumors were associated with improved outcomes (p = 0.016). Surgical resection was associated with improved outcomes (p = 0.032), although limited by potential confounding effect. Antiviral treatment (p = 0.095), rituximab (p = 0.111), and SCT (p = 0.198) showed a trend toward improved outcomes. The remaining treatments including methotrexate showed no improvement.
CONCLUSION
We propose that surgical resection, rituximab, and antiviral treatment may be considered as an alternative to standard HD-MTX based regimens when managing iatrogenic immunodeficiency associated LPD of the CNS. Further study through prospective cohort studies or randomized clinical trials is warranted.
Standard therapy for glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This Phase 3 trial evaluates the addition of an autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax
-L) to ...standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
After surgery and chemoradiotherapy, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive temozolomide plus DCVax-L (n = 232) or temozolomide and placebo (n = 99). Following recurrence, all patients were allowed to receive DCVax-L, without unblinding. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 331), median OS (mOS) was 23.1 months from surgery. Because of the cross-over trial design, nearly 90% of the ITT population received DCVax-L. For patients with methylated MGMT (n = 131), mOS was 34.7 months from surgery, with a 3-year survival of 46.4%. As of this analysis, 223 patients are ≥ 30 months past their surgery date; 67 of these (30.0%) have lived ≥ 30 months and have a Kaplan-Meier (KM)-derived mOS of 46.5 months. 182 patients are ≥ 36 months past surgery; 44 of these (24.2%) have lived ≥ 36 months and have a KM-derived mOS of 88.2 months. A population of extended survivors (n = 100) with mOS of 40.5 months, not explained by known prognostic factors, will be analyzed further. Only 2.1% of ITT patients (n = 7) had a grade 3 or 4 adverse event that was deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. Overall adverse events with DCVax were comparable to standard therapy alone.
Addition of DCVax-L to standard therapy is feasible and safe in glioblastoma patients, and may extend survival. Trial registration Funded by Northwest Biotherapeutics; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00045968; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00045968?term=NCT00045968&rank=1 ; initially registered 19 September 2002.
PDF
