To determine whether high-dose radiation leads to improved outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
This analysis included 106 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent Stages ...I-III NSCLC, treated with 63-103 Gy in 2.1-Gy fractions, using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) per a dose escalation trial. Targets included the primary tumor and any lymph nodes > or =1 cm, without intentionally including negative nodal regions. Nineteen percent of patients (20/106) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were evaluated for association with outcomes. Estimated median follow-up was 8.5 years.
Median survival was 19 months, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 13%. Multivariate analysis revealed weight loss (p = 0.011) and radiation dose (p = 0.0006) were significant predictors for OS. The 5-year OS was 4%, 22%, and 28% for patients receiving 63-69, 74-84, and 92-103 Gy, respectively. Although presence of nodal disease was negatively associated with locoregional control under univariate analysis, radiation dose was the only significant predictor when multiple variables were included (p = 0.015). The 5-year control rate was 12%, 35%, and 49% for 63-69, 74-84, and 92-103 Gy, respectively.
Higher dose radiation is associated with improved outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated in the range of 63-103 Gy.
Hypofractionated radiation therapy is a less burdensome and less costly approach that is efficacious for most patients with early-stage breast cancer. Concerns about racial disparities in adoption of ...medical advances motivate investigation of the use of hypofractionated radiation in diverse populations. The goal of our study was to determine whether hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery was being similarly used across racial groups in the state of Michigan.
A prospectively collected statewide quality consortium database from 25 institutions was queried for patients with breast cancer who completed hypofractionated (HF) or conventionally fractionated whole breast radiation therapy from January 2012 to December 2018. We used patient-level multivariable modeling to evaluate associations between HF use and race, controlling for patient and facility factors, and multilevel modeling to account for patient clustering within facilities.
Of 9634 patients analyzed, 81% self-reported race as white, 17% as black, and 2% as Asian, similar to statewide and national distributions. In addition, 31.7% of whites were treated at teaching centers compared with 66.7% of blacks and 64.8% of Asians. In 2018, HF was used in 72.7% of whites versus 56.7% of blacks and 67.6% of Asians (P = .0411). On patient-level multivariable analysis, black and Asian races were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of HF receipt (P < .001), despite accounting for treatment year, age, laterality, body mass index, breast volume, comorbidities, stage, triple-negative status, intensity modulated radiation therapy use, teaching center treatment, and 2011 American Society for Radiation Oncology Hypofractionation Guideline eligibility. On multilevel analysis, race was no longer significantly associated with HF receipt.
We observed that black and Asian patients receive hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy less often than whites, despite more frequent treatment at teaching centers. Multilevel modeling eliminated this disparity, suggesting that differences in facility-specific HF use appear to have contributed. Further inquiry is needed to determine whether reduction of facility-level variation may reduce disparities in accessing HF treatment.
We investigated whether the use of chemotherapy before whole breast irradiation (WBI) using either conventional fractionation (CWBI) or hypofractionation (HWBI) is associated with increased toxic ...effects or worse cosmetic outcome compared with WBI alone.
We identified 6754 patients who received WBI alone (without a third field covering the superior axillary and supraclavicular nodal regions) with data prospectively collected in a statewide consortium. We reported rates of 4 toxic effects: physician-reported acute moist desquamation, patient-reported acute moderate/severe breast pain, a composite acute toxic effect measure (including moist desquamation and either patient- or physician-reported moderate/significant breast pain), and physician-reported impaired cosmetic outcome at 1 year after WBI. Successive multivariable models were constructed to estimate the effect of chemotherapy on these outcomes.
Rates of moist desquamation, patient-reported pain, composite acute toxic effects, and impaired cosmetic outcome were 23%, 34%, 42%, and 10% for 2859 patients receiving CWBI and 13%, 28%, 31%, and 11% for 3895 patients receiving HWBI. Receipt of chemotherapy before CWBI was not associated with higher rates of patient-reported pain, composite acute toxic effects, or impaired cosmetic outcome compared with CWBI without chemotherapy but was associated with more moist desquamation (odds ratio, 1.32 1.07-1.63; P = .01). Receipt of chemotherapy before HWBI was not associated with higher rates of any of the 4 toxic effects compared with HWBI alone.
In this cohort, use of chemotherapy before WBI was generally well tolerated. CWBI with chemotherapy but not HWBI with chemotherapy was associated with higher rates of moist desquamation. Rates of acute breast pain and impaired cosmetic outcome at 1 year were comparable in patients receiving chemotherapy before either CWBI or HWBI. These data support the use of HWBI after chemotherapy.
Regional nodal irradiation, including radiation therapy (RT) to the internal mammary node (IMN) region, improves oncologic outcomes in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Concern remains, ...however, given the proximity of the IMNs to the heart and the association between cardiac RT exposure and toxicity. The objective of the study was to evaluate rates of ischemic cardiac events (ICEs) and associated risk with treatment of the IMN region.
The cardiac outcomes of 2126 patients treated with adjuvant breast RT or breast and nodal RT from 1984 to 2007 at a single institution were reviewed. The primary endpoint was an ICE following RT initiation. The association between IMN RT and ICEs was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Treatment with both IMN RT and 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) began in 1997; therefore, subset analyses of patients with only 3D CRT were performed to minimize bias associated with improved treatment technique.
The median follow-up period was 9.3 years. An ICE occurred in 87 patients (4.1%). No increased 10-year rate of ICEs was observed with IMN RT compared with no IMN RT in the total cohort (3.2% 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.4%-4.3% vs 3.4% 95% CI, 1.5%-7.5%; hazard ratio HR, 0.88; P=.73). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was noted in the 3D CRT-planned, left-sided disease subset (5.1% 95% CI, 1.8%-14.1% vs 4.0% 95% CI, 2.0%-8.0%; HR, 1.18, P=.76). On multivariate analysis, adjusting for cardiac risk factor imbalances, no significantly increased hazard was noted with IMN RT (HR, 1.84; P=.28) in the 3D CRT-planned, left-sided disease subset.
No statistically significant association between IMN RT and ICEs was demonstrated in a review of patients treated at a single institution from 1984 to 2007. Given the long natural history and low overall rate of ICEs, continued follow-up of this study, as well as additional studies in the 3D CRT era, is warranted to confirm these results. Minimizing cardiac exposure, when treating a limited IMN field, is critical to limit excess risk of ICEs.
Understanding whether physicians accurately detect symptoms in patients with breast cancer is important because recognition of symptoms facilitates supportive care, and clinical trials often rely on ...physician assessments using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
To compare the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy from January 1, 2012, to March 31, 2020, with physicians' CTCAE assessments to assess underrecognition of symptoms.
This cohort study included a total of 29 practices enrolled in the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium quality initiative. Of 13 725 patients with breast cancer who received treatment with radiotherapy after undergoing lumpectomy, 9941 patients (72.4%) completed at least 1 PRO questionnaire during treatment with radiotherapy and were evaluated for the study. Of these, 9868 patients (99.3%) were matched to physician CTCAE assessments that were completed within 3 days of the PRO questionnaires.
Patient and physician ratings of 4 symptoms (pain, pruritus, edema, and fatigue) were compared.
We used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with symptom underrecognition, hypothesizing that it would be more common in racial and ethnic minority groups.
Of 9941 patients, all were female, 1655 (16.6%) were Black, 7925 (79.7%) were White, and 361 (3.6%) had Other race and ethnicity (including American Indian/Alaska Native, Arab/Middle Eastern, and Asian), either as self-reported or as indicated in the electronic medical record. A total of 1595 (16.0%) were younger than 50 years, 2874 (28.9%) were age 50 to 59 years, 3353 (33.7%) were age 60 to 69 years, and 2119 (21.3%) were 70 years or older. Underrecognition of symptoms existed in 2094 of 6781 (30.9%) observations of patient-reported moderate/severe pain, 748 of 2039 observations (36.7%) of patient-reported frequent pruritus, 2309 of 4492 observations (51.4%) of patient-reported frequent edema, and 390 of 2079 observations (18.8%) of patient-reported substantial fatigue. Underrecognition of at least 1 symptom occurred at least once for 2933 of 5510 (53.2%) of those who reported at least 1 substantial symptom. Factors independently associated with underrecognition were younger age (younger than 50 years compared with 60-69 years: odds ratio OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.59; P < .001; age 50-59 years compared with 60-69 years: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37; P = .02), race (Black individuals compared with White individuals: OR, 1.56; 95% CI 1.30-1.88; P < .001; individuals with Other race or ethnicity compared with White individuals: OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07; P = .01), conventional fractionation (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .002), male physician sex (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.20-1.99; P = .002), and 2-field radiotherapy (without a supraclavicular field) (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.97; P = .02).
The results of this cohort study suggest that PRO collection may be essential for trials because relying on the CTCAE to detect adverse events may miss important symptoms. Moreover, since physicians in this study systematically missed substantial symptoms in certain patients, including younger patients and Black individuals or those of Other race and ethnicity, improving symptom detection may be a targetable mechanism to reduce disparities.
To study whether changes of 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) during treatment correlate with post-treatment responses in tumor and normal lung in patients with ...non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients with stage I to III NSCLC requiring a definitive dose of fractionated radiation therapy (RT) were eligible. FDG-PET/computed tomography scans were acquired before, during, and after RT. Tumor and lung metabolic responses were assessed qualitatively by physicians and quantitatively by normalized peak FDG activity (the ratio of the maximum FDG activity divided by the mean of the aortic arch background).
The study reached the goal of recruiting 15 patients between February 2004 and August 2005. Of these, 11 patients had partial metabolic response, two patients had complete metabolic response, and two patients had stable disease at approximately 45 Gy during RT. The mean peak tumor FDG activity was 5.2 (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.4), 2.5 (95% CI, 2.0 to 3.0), and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.0) on pre-, during, and post-RT scans, respectively. None of the patients had appreciable changes in the lung during RT. The peak FDG activity of the lung was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.59), 0.52 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.64), and 1.29 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.76), on pre-, during-, and post-RT scans, respectively. The qualitative response during RT correlated with the overall response post-RT (P = .03); the peak tumor FDG activity during RT correlated with those 3 months post-RT (R2 = 0.7; P < .001).
This pilot study suggests a significant correlation in tumor metabolic response and no association in lung FDG activity between during RT scans and 3 months post-RT scans in patients with NSCLC. Additional study with a large number of patients is needed to validate these findings.
We aimed to report the final toxicity results on a radiation-dose escalation trial designed to test a hypothesis that very high doses of radiation could be safely administered to patients with ...non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by quantifying the dose-volume toxicity relationship of the lung.
A total of 109 patients with unresectable or medically inoperable NSCLC were enrolled and treated with radiation-dose escalation (on the basis of predicted normal-lung toxicity) either alone or with neoadjuvant chemotherapy by use of 3D conformal techniques. Eighty-four patients (77%) received more than 69 Gy, the trial was stopped after the dose reached 103 Gy. Estimated median follow-up was 110 months.
There were 17 (14.6%) Grade 2 to 3 pneumonitis and 15 (13.8%) Grade 2 to 3 fibrosis and no Grade 4 to 5 lung toxicity. Multivariate analyses showed them to be (1) not associated with the dose prescribed to the tumor, and (2) significantly (p<0.001) associated with lung-dosimetric parameters such as the mean lung dose (MLD), volume of lung that received at least 20 Gy (V20), and the normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung. If cutoffs are 30% for V20, 20 Gy for MLD, and 10% for NTCP, these factors have positive predictive values of 50% to 71% and negative predictive value of 85% to 89%.
With long-term follow-up for toxicity, we have demonstrated that much higher doses of radiation than are traditionally administered can be safely delivered to a majority of patients with NSCLC. Quantitative lung dose-volume toxicity-based dose escalation can form the basis for individualized high-dose radiation treatment to maximize the therapeutic ratio in these patients.
This study determined practice patterns in the staging and treatment of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) member ...institutions. Secondary aims were to determine trends in the use of definitive therapy, predictors of treatment type, and acute adverse events associated with primary modalities of treatment.
Data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Oncology Outcomes Database from 2007 to 2011 for US patients with stage I NSCLC were used. Main outcome measures included patterns of care, predictors of treatment, acute morbidity, and acute mortality.
Seventy-nine percent of patients received surgery, 16% received definitive radiation therapy (RT), and 3% were not treated. Seventy-four percent of the RT patients received stereotactic body RT (SBRT), and the remainder received nonstereotactic RT (NSRT). Among participating NCCN member institutions, the number of surgeries-to-RT course ratios varied between 1.6 and 34.7 (P<.01), and the SBRT-to-NSRT ratio varied between 0 and 13 (P=.01). Significant variations were also observed in staging practices, with brain imaging 0.33 (0.25-0.43) times as likely and mediastinoscopy 31.26 (21.84-44.76) times more likely for surgical patients than for RT patients. Toxicity rates for surgical and for SBRT patients were similar, although the rates were double for NSRT patients.
The variations in treatment observed among NCCN institutions reflects the lack of level I evidence directing the use of surgery or SBRT for stage I NSCLC. In this setting, research of patient and physician preferences may help to guide future decision making.
Preclinical data and subset analyses from immunotherapy clinical trials indicate that prior radiation therapy was associated with better progression-free survival and overall survival when combined ...with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We present a prospective study of hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy (HIGRT) to a single site of metastatic disease concurrently with atezolizumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Patients meeting eligibility criteria received 1200 mg of atezolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks with concurrent 3- or 5-fraction HIGRT starting no later than the second cycle. The 3-fraction regimen employed a minimum of 8 Gy per fraction compared with 6 Gy for the 5-fraction regimen. Imaging was obtained every 12 weeks to assess response.
From October 2015 to February 2017, 12 patients were enrolled in the study (median age 64; range, 55-77 years). The best response by the Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors criteria was partial response in 3 and stable disease in 3, for a disease control rate of 50%. Five patients had a grade 3 immune-related adverse event, including choreoretinitis (n = 1), pneumonitis (n = 1), transaminitis (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 1). The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months, and the median overall survival was 6.9 months (range, 0.4-not reached). There was no clear association between peripheral blood T cell repertoire characteristics at baseline, PD-L1, or tumor mutations and response or outcome. One long-term survivor exhibited oligoclonal T cell populations in a baseline tumor biopsy that were consistently detected in peripheral blood over the entire course of the study.
HIGRT plus atezolizumab resulted in an overall response rate of 25% and disease control rate of 50% in this pilot study. The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was similar to that of atezolizumab alone. Alhough it was a pilot study with limited sample size, the results generated hypotheses worthy of further investigation.
PDF
