Objective Chemoradiotherapy is a popular definitive therapy for esophageal carcinoma among many patients and oncologists. Although the complete response rates are high and short-term survival is ...favorable after chemoradiotherapy, persistent or recurrent locoregional disease is frequent. Salvage surgery is the sole curative intent treatment option for this course of the disease. The present study evaluates the safety and value of salvage esophagectomy for locoregional failure after high-dose definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We reviewed 59 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy. All patients received more than 60 Gy of radiation plus concurrent chemotherapy for curative intent. The data were compared with those of patients who received esophagectomy without preoperative therapy. Results Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were increased among patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy compared with those who underwent esophagectomy without preoperative therapy (mean hospital stay, 38 vs 33 days; anastomotic leak rates, 31% vs 25%; respiratory complication rates, 31% vs 20%; reintubation within 1 week, 2% vs 2%; hospital mortality rates, 8% vs 2%). Tracheobronchial necrosis and gastric conduit necrosis were highly lethal complications after salvage esophagectomy; 3-year postoperative survivals were 38% and 58%, respectively. Conclusion Patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive high-dose chemoradiotherapy had increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, this is acceptable in view of the potential long-term survival after salvage esophagectomy. Such treatment should be considered for carefully selected patients at specialized centers.
Surgical samples have long been used as important subjects for cancer research. In accordance with an increase of neoadjuvant therapy, biopsy samples have recently become imperative for cancer ...transcriptome. On the other hand, both biopsy and surgical samples are available for expression profiling for predicting clinical outcome by adjuvant therapy; however, it is still unclear whether surgical sample expression profiles are useful for prediction via biopsy samples, because little has been done about comparative gene expression profiling between the two kinds of samples.
A total of 166 samples (77 biopsy and 89 surgical) of normal and malignant lesions of the esophagus were analyzed by microarrays. Gene expression profiles were compared between biopsy and surgical samples. Artificially induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (aiEMT) was found in the surgical samples, and also occurred in mouse esophageal epithelial cell layers under an ischemic condition. Identification of clinically significant subgroups was thought to be disrupted by the disorder of the expression profile through this aiEMT.
This study will evoke the fundamental misinterpretation including underestimation of the prognostic evaluation power of markers by overestimation of EMT IN past cancer research, and will furnish some advice for the near future as follows: 1) Understanding how long the tissues were under an ischemic condition. 2) Prevalence of biopsy samples for in vivo expression profiling with low biases on basic and clinical research. 3) Checking cancer cell contents and normal- or necrotic-tissue contamination in biopsy samples for prevalence.
PDF
