The aim of this study was to investigate the early and late outcomes of patients undergoing pulmonary embolectomy for acute massive pulmonary embolus.
Twenty-one patients (15 male, 6 female) ...underwent pulmonary embolectomy at our institution between March 2001 and July 2010. The median age was 55 years (range, 24 to 70 years). Of these, 9 patients presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and 8 presented with New York Heart Association class III or IV. Sixteen patients underwent preoperative transthoracic echocardiography, which showed evidence of right ventricular dilatation in all, whereas in 14 patients (66.6%) pulmonary artery pressures were significantly elevated with moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation. The median preoperative Euroscore was 9 (range, 3 to 16), and 11 patients (52.1%) received systemic thrombolysis preoperatively. There were 6 salvage (28.5%), 10 emergency (47.6%), and 5 urgent (23.8%) procedures. Concomitant procedures were performed in 3 patients (14.2%), and surgery was performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass in 3 patients (14.2%). The median follow-up was 38 months (range, 0 to 114 months).
The in-hospital mortality was 19% (n = 4). Postoperative complications included stroke (n = 3, 14.2%), lower respiratory tract infection (n = 6, 28.5%), wound infection (n = 3, 14.2%), acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration (n = 4, 19%), and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 4, 19%). At discharge, transthoracic echocardiography showed mild to moderate right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation in 11 survivors (64.7%). Two patients died during follow-up, and actuarial survival at 5 years was 76.9% ± 10.1% and at 8 years was 51.2% ± 22.0%. At final follow-up, 11 of the 15 survivors (73.3%) were New York Heart Association class I, and no patients required further intervention.
Patients who undergo surgery for massive pulmonary embolism have an acceptable outcome despite being high-risk.
To examine the midterm clinical outcome of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) with prosthetic valves.
We reviewed 37 consecutive patients who underwent PVR with biological prosthetic valves between ...September 1999 and June 2010. The median age was 22.6 years (range: 6 to 70 years; three children). The primary diagnosis was Tetralogy of Fallot in 20 patients (54%). Valve pathology was regurgitation in 27 patients (72.9%). Cardiac surgery had been previously performed in 35 patients (94.5%). The median size of the prosthesis was 25 mm (range: 21 to 31 mm). The median follow-up was 42 months (range: 1.2 to 129 months).
There were no early valve-related deaths. Hospital mortality was 2.7% (n = 1) and no patient required early rereplacement of prosthesis. Two patients required permanent pacemaker insertion. During follow-up, there was no late death, reoperation for structural valve degeneration, or valve thrombosis. Only one patient required repeated operation for endocarditis at 37 months follow-up. The actuarial survival at 5 years was 95.1 ± 3.8%. Overall freedom from reoperation after PVR at 5 years was 93.0 ± 8.6%. At last follow-up, 34 patients (91.8%) were NYHA class I versus 20 patients (54%) preoperatively (p < 0.05). In the 35 surviving patients who did not undergo redo-PVR, there was no-mild regurgitation and the peak PV gradient was 20.4 ± 10.2 mm Hg (16.2 ± 9.3 mm Hg preoperatively). Thirty-two patients (91.4%) had good right ventricular function compared with 26 patients (74.2%) preoperatively.
PVR with biological prosthetic valves can be performed with good midterm survival, functional status, and haemodynamics.
