The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer continues to be debated. The presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after surgery predicts very poor recurrence-free survival, whereas ...its absence predicts a low risk of recurrence. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for ctDNA-positive patients is not well understood.
We conducted a trial to assess whether a ctDNA-guided approach could reduce the use of adjuvant chemotherapy without compromising recurrence risk. Patients with stage II colon cancer were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to have treatment decisions guided by either ctDNA results or standard clinicopathological features. For ctDNA-guided management, a ctDNA-positive result at 4 or 7 weeks after surgery prompted oxaliplatin-based or fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Patients who were ctDNA-negative were not treated. The primary efficacy end point was recurrence-free survival at 2 years. A key secondary end point was adjuvant chemotherapy use.
Of the 455 patients who underwent randomization, 302 were assigned to ctDNA-guided management and 153 to standard management. The median follow-up was 37 months. A lower percentage of patients in the ctDNA-guided group than in the standard-management group received adjuvant chemotherapy (15% vs. 28%; relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.25 to 2.65). In the evaluation of 2-year recurrence-free survival, ctDNA-guided management was noninferior to standard management (93.5% and 92.4%, respectively; absolute difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 6.2 noninferiority margin, -8.5 percentage points). Three-year recurrence-free survival was 86.4% among ctDNA-positive patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and 92.5% among ctDNA-negative patients who did not.
A ctDNA-guided approach to the treatment of stage II colon cancer reduced adjuvant chemotherapy use without compromising recurrence-free survival. (Supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and others; DYNAMIC Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12615000381583.).
In patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), the role of pre- and postoperative systemic therapy continues to be debated. Previous studies have shown that circulating tumor DNA ...(ctDNA) analysis, as a marker of minimal residual disease, is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Serial analysis of ctDNA in patients with resectable CRLM could inform the optimal use of perioperative chemotherapy. Here, we performed a validation study to confirm the prognostic impact of postoperative ctDNA in resectable CRLM observed in a previous discovery study.
We prospectively collected plasma samples from patients with resectable CRLM, including presurgical and postsurgical samples, serial samples during any pre- or postoperative chemotherapy, and serial samples in follow-up. Via targeted sequencing of 15 genes commonly mutated in CRC, we identified at least 1 somatic mutation in each patient's tumor. We then designed a personalized assay to assess 1 mutation in plasma samples using the Safe-SeqS assay. A total of 380 plasma samples from 54 patients recruited from July 2011 to Dec 2014 were included in our analysis. Twenty-three (43%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 42 patients (78%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Median follow-up was 51 months (interquartile range, 31 to 60 months). At least 1 somatic mutation was identified in all patients' tumor tissue. ctDNA was detectable in 46/54 (85%) patients prior to any treatment and 12/49 (24%) patients after surgery. There was a median 40.93-fold (19.10 to 87.73, P < 0.001) decrease in ctDNA mutant allele fraction with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but ctDNA clearance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a better recurrence-free survival (RFS). Patients with detectable postoperative ctDNA experienced a significantly lower RFS (HR 6.3; 95% CI 2.58 to 15.2; P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.5 to 11.8; P < 0.001) compared to patients with undetectable ctDNA. For the 11 patients with detectable postoperative ctDNA who had serial ctDNA sampling during adjuvant chemotherapy, ctDNA clearance was observed in 3 patients, 2 of whom remained disease-free. All 8 patients with persistently detectable ctDNA after adjuvant chemotherapy have recurred. End-of-treatment (surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy) ctDNA detection was associated with a 5-year RFS of 0% compared to 75.6% for patients with an undetectable end-of-treatment ctDNA (HR 14.9; 95% CI 4.94 to 44.7; P < 0.001). Key limitations of the study include the small sample size and the potential for false-positive findings with multiple hypothesis testing.
We confirmed the prognostic impact of postsurgery and posttreatment ctDNA in patients with resected CRLM. The potential utility of serial ctDNA analysis during adjuvant chemotherapy as an early marker of treatment efficacy was also demonstrated. Further studies are required to define how to optimally integrate ctDNA analyses into decision-making regarding the use and timing of adjuvant therapy for resectable CRLM.
ACTRN12612000345886.
Studies in multiple solid tumor types have demonstrated the prognostic significance of ctDNA analysis after curative intent surgery. A combined analysis of data across completed studies could further ...our understanding of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic marker and inform future trial design. We combined individual patient data from three independent cohort studies of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Plasma samples were collected 4 to 10 weeks after surgery. Mutations in ctDNA were assayed using a massively parallel sequencing technique called SafeSeqS. We analyzed 485 CRC patients (230 Stage II colon, 96 Stage III colon, and 159 locally advanced rectum). ctDNA was detected after surgery in 59 (12%) patients overall (11.0%, 12.5% and 13.8% for samples taken at 4‐6, 6‐8 and 8‐10 weeks; P = .740). ctDNA detection was associated with poorer 5‐year recurrence‐free (38.6% vs 85.5%; P < .001) and overall survival (64.6% vs 89.4%; P < .001). The predictive accuracy of postsurgery ctDNA for recurrence was higher than that of individual clinicopathologic risk features. Recurrence risk increased exponentially with increasing ctDNA mutant allele frequency (MAF) (hazard ratio, 1.2, 2.5 and 5.8 for MAF of 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%). Postsurgery ctDNA was detected in 3 of 20 (15%) patients with locoregional and 27 of 60 (45%) with distant recurrence (P = .018). This analysis demonstrates a consistent long‐term impact of ctDNA as a prognostic marker across nonmetastatic CRC, where ctDNA outperforms other clinicopathologic risk factors and MAF further stratifies recurrence risk. ctDNA is a better predictor of distant vs locoregional recurrence.
What's new?
Pathology‐based cancer staging, by which a patient is classified as high‐risk or low‐risk, cannot perfectly predict which patients will experience a recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis can more accurately predict recurrence than clinico‐pathologic features. Here, the authors report a combined analysis of three independent cohort studies of patients with non‐metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with detectable ctDNA after surgery had a significantly lower 5‐year survival rate. The ctDNA was sequenced to detect mutations, and recurrence risk increased exponentially with increasing mutant allele fraction of ctDNA.
To report clinical experience with radioembolization (RE) plus systemic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).
Clinical outcomes were evaluated ...retrospectively among 19 patients with unresectable liver metastases from CRC who had a good performance status and a low burden of extrahepatic disease (EHD) and were eligible for RE. Most (74%) had disease confined to the liver. Concurrent treatment with 5-fluorourail/leucovorin (n = 7) or 5-fluorourail/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 12) was started 3-4 days before single treatment with RE.
Overall response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 84% (two complete responses and 14 partial responses). Median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10.4 months and median overall survival (OS) time was 29.4 months. For patients with disease confined to the liver, PFS improved (10.7 mo vs 3.6 mo; P = .09), with significant prolongation of OS (median, 37.8 mo vs 13.4 mo; P = .03) compared with those who had EHD. Nine patients, including three long-term (> 3 y) survivors, remained alive after a median follow-up of 18.6 months. Serious treatment-related toxicities included febrile neutropenia with concurrent FOLFOX treatment, a perforated duodenal ulcer, and one death from hepatic toxicity.
The present findings confirm the effectiveness of RE plus systemic chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. Patients with liver-confined disease derived the greatest benefit, with median survival times beyond 36 months. Larger datasets from ongoing phase III trials are needed to further define the safety and efficacy of RE in the first-line setting.
Abstract Background With an ever-increasing focus on personalized medicine, all factors known to affect treatment response need to be considered when defining optimal therapy for individual patients. ...While the prognostic impact of primary tumor site on colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes is established, emerging data suggest potential differences in response to biological therapies. Here we explore the impact of tumor site on bevacizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic CRC. Patients & Methods Analysis of patients in an Australian prospective multi-center mCRC registry who received first-line chemotherapy. Tumor site was defined as right colon (RCC) - caecum to transverse, left colon (LCC) - splenic flexure to rectosigmoid, and rectum (RC). Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used for survival analyses. Results Of 926 patients, 297 had RCC, 354 LCC and 275 RC primaries. Median age was 68.6, 65.9 and 63.3 years respectively (p=0.001). RCC was significantly associated with intraperitoneal spread ( P <0.0001), while LCC and RC preferentially metastasized to the liver and lungs, respectively ( P <0.0001 in both settings). 636 (68.7%) patients received bevacizumab. Progression-free survival (PFS) was superior for bevacizumab-treated patients in all groups, but appeared greatest in RCC (HR 0.46 95% CI 0.36-0.60; p = <0.001). Overall survival was longest in patients with RC, followed by LCC and RCC (median: 26.2, 23.6, 18.2 months, p = 0.0004). Conclusion Tumor site appears to be prognostic in mCRC, with RC and RCC associated with best and worst outcomes respectively. Patients who receive bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy had superior outcomes, with the effect appearing greatest in RCC patients.
Adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer Kosmider, Suzanne; Lipton, Lara
World journal of gastroenterology : WJG,
07/2007, Volume:
13, Issue:
28
Journal Article
Open access
The management of colon and rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the last 25 years. The use of adjuvant therapies has become standard practice in locally advanced (stage III and selected stage ...II) colorectal cancer. Improved surgical techniques, chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy are resulting in higher cure rates and the development of agents targeting proliferative and angiogenic pathways offer further promise. Here we explore risk factors for local and distant recurrence after resection of colon and rectal cancer, and the role of adjuvant treatments. Discussion will focus on the evidence base for adjuvant therapies utilised in colorectal cancer, and the treatment of sub-groups such as the elderly and stage II disease. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer in reduction of recurrence will be explored and the role and optimal methods for surveillance post-curative resection with or without adjuvant therapy will also be addressed.
Objectives
Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), particularly CD8+ TILs in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), are highly prognostic in the early‐disease stages (I‐II). In metastatic disease ...(stage IV; mCRC), their influence is less well defined. It has presumably failed to contain tumor cells to the primary site; however, is this evident? We explored the prognostic impact of TILs at the primary site in patients who presented de novo with mCRC.
Methods
Treatment‐naïve patients (109) with mCRC were assessed for CD8+ TILs and PD‐L1 expression. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was evaluated by IHC for PMS2 and MSH6 proteins and/or by PCR using the Bethesda panel.
Results
Microsatellite instability‐high tumors had significantly more CD8+ TILs, with no significant survival advantage observed between MSI‐H and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors (12 vs 19 months, P = 0.304). TIL density for all cases had no impact on OS (low: 20 vs high: 13 months, P = 0.426), while PD‐L1 of 1% or higher was associated with reduced mean survival (9.6 vs 18.9 months; P = 0.038). MSI‐H tumors and associated immune cells had higher PD‐L1 expression than in MSS cases. A positive correlation between PD‐L1 on immune cells and CD8+ve TILs was found. A subset of MSS tumors had relatively high TILs approximating that of MSI‐H tumors.
Conclusion
In contrast to early‐stage CRC, the immune response in primary tumors of patients with de novo mCRC does not appear to influence survival. A subgroup of MSS tumors was identified with increased TILs/PD‐L1 comparable to MSI‐H tumors, traditionally not be considered for immune checkpoint blockade and perhaps should be.
Unlike early‐stage colorectal cancer (CRC), the immune response in primary tumors of patients with de novo mCRC does not appear to influence survival despite MSI‐H tumors having higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). This unique cohort of patients with synchronous mCRC by definition represents the breakdown of immune containment of the primary tumor. Despite this, we also identified a subgroup of MSS tumors with a high TILs comparable to MSI‐H tumors and this group traditionally would not be considered for immune checkpoint blockade, and perhaps should be.
Purpose
Although the financial burden and impact of a cancer diagnosis has been widely described in international literature, less understood is the availability and accessibility of services to ...ameliorate this need. This study reports the experiences of Australian lung cancer patients and health professionals delivering care, regarding factors that exacerbate and mitigate financial stress, and availability and accessibility of services to support people following a cancer diagnosis.
Methods
Qualitative semi-structured interviews with twenty-three lung cancer patients attending two metropolitan tertiary health services and eleven health professionals delivering care were undertaken during July–August 2021.
Results
Neither health service systematically screened for financial toxicity nor routinely provided information regarding potential financial impacts during consultations. Patients experienced lengthy delays in accessing welfare supports, provoking financial stress and worry. Health professionals reported limited resources and referral services to support patients with financial need; this was especially problematic for patients with lung cancer. They described its psychological impact on patients and their family members or carers and warned of its impact on ability to adhere to treatment.
Conclusion
Available and accessibility of services addressing financial toxicity in Australian lung cancer patients is inadequate. Although financial stress is a common, distressing problem, health professionals feel hampered in their ability to help due to limited service availability. Left unaddressed, financial toxicity can impact treatment adherence, directly influencing health outcomes, and increase risk of poverty, amplifying social inequities. Findings highlight opportunity for actionable interventions like financial consent and routine screening and discussion of financial toxicity across care pathways.
Introduction
Despite significant advances in the management of lung cancer, patients continue to experience a high burden of unmet need impacting quality of life and outcomes of care. Achieving ...value‐based health care, where investment is targeted to services that deliver optimal experience and outcomes of care relative to the cost of delivering that care, requires attention to what people value most in meeting their needs. To date there has been little attention to what matters most to patients with lung cancer (i.e., what they value) as a component of achieving value‐based cancer care. This qualitative study was undertaken to investigate components of care valued by people with lung cancer in Australia.
Methods
This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with 23 people with lung cancer. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy from two metropolitan tertiary public health services. Data collected included demographic characteristics and patient perspectives regarding their priority concerns and components of care identified as most valuable in meeting their needs. Demographic characteristics of participants were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically using Interpretive Description.
Results
Data analysis generated three key themes: valued components of care; benefits of receiving valued care components and consequences of missed opportunities for care. The components of care valued by patients reflect the core dimensions of cancer supportive care, with particular emphasis on ongoing opportunities for consultation (screening for unmet needs) and provision of person‐centred information. The facilitation of trust between patients and their treating team, as a consequence of having these valued components evident in their care, was identified as a key characteristic of value‐based care.
Conclusions
This study has identified valued components of care described by people with lung cancer. Importantly, the care components identified have been proven to improve access to and coordination of care, and demonstrate the importance of integrating supportive care into care provision to achieve value‐based cancer care.
Patient or Public Contribution
This study was informed by perspectives of lung cancer patients who participated in semistructured interviews. We acknowledge that this contribution does not meet the criteria for patient and public involvement in research as defined by Health Expectations, but this study forms part of a larger program of cancer supportive care work being undertaken by this team, where comprehensive consumer engagement and co‐design approaches are embedded in our work.
PDF
