Abstract
Introduction
Levofloxacin and rifampicin are the preferred treatment for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus, especially when managed with implant retention ...(DAIR). However, a significant variability of success has been reported, which could be related to intrinsic characteristics of the microorganism. Our aim was to evaluate the variability in the anti-biofilm response to levofloxacin and rifampicin in a clinical collection of S. aureus.
Material and methods
Eleven levofloxacin- and rifampicin-susceptible S. aureus isolates causing PJI managed with DAIR were included. Levofloxacin, rifampicin and levofloxacin + rifampicin were tested in an in vitro static biofilm model in microtitre plates, where 48 h biofilms were challenged with antimicrobials during 24 h. Additionally, two genetically similar strains were tested in the CDC Biofilm Reactor, where 48 h biofilms were treated during 56 h. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by viable biofilm-embedded cells recount, and by crystal violet staining.
Results
All antimicrobial regimens showed significant anti-biofilm activity, but a notable scattering in the response was observed across all strains (inter-strain coefficient of variation for levofloxacin, rifampicin and levofloxacin + rifampicin of 22.8%, 35.8% and 34.5%, respectively). This variability was tempered with the combination regimen when tested in the biofilm reactor. No correlation was observed between the minimal biofilm eradicative concentration and the antimicrobial activity. Recurrent S. aureus isolates exhibited higher biofilm-forming ability compared with strains from resolved infections (7.6 log10 cfu/cm2±0.50 versus 9.0 log10 cfu±0.07).
Conclusions
Significant variability may be expected in response to levofloxacin and rifampicin among biofilm-embedded S. aureus. A response in the lower range, together with other factors of bad prognosis, could be responsible of treatment failure.
Abstract
Background
Cutibacterium species are common pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). These infections are often treated with β-lactams or clindamycin as monotherapy, or in ...combination with rifampin. Clinical evidence supporting the value of adding rifampin for treatment of Cutibacterium PJI is lacking.
Methods
In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated patients with Cutibacterium PJI and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined by the absence of infection relapse or new infection. We used Fisher’s exact tests and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the effect of rifampin and other factors on clinical success after PJI.
Results
We included 187 patients (72.2% male, median age 67 years) with a median follow-up of 36 months. The surgical intervention was a 2-stage exchange in 95 (50.8%), 1-stage exchange in 51 (27.3%), debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in 34 (18.2%), and explantation without reimplantation in 7 (3.7%) patients. Rifampin was included in the antibiotic regimen in 81 (43.3%) cases. Infection relapse occurred in 28 (15.0%), and new infection in 13 (7.0%) cases. In the time-to-event analysis, DAIR (adjusted hazard ratio HR = 2.15, P = .03) and antibiotic treatment over 6 weeks (adjusted HR = 0.29, P = .0002) significantly influenced treatment failure. We observed a tentative evidence for a beneficial effect of adding rifampin to the antibiotic treatment—though not statistically significant for treatment failure (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .07) and not for relapses (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .10).
Conclusions
We conclude that a rifampin combination is not markedly superior in Cutibacterium PJI, but a dedicated prospective multicenter study is needed.
In this retrospective study, we observed no significant benefit of using rifampin to avoid relapses or new infections but a benefit when the prosthesis was removed or exchanged and an antibiotic treatment was given for at least 6 weeks.
Objectives To assess the clinical features, risk factors, molecular epidemiology and outcome of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteraemia in hospitalized cancer ...patients. Methods Episodes of ESBL-EC bacteraemia were compared with a susceptible control group in a 3 year prospective study. ESBL-EC strains were studied by PCR and isoelectric focusing, and molecular typing was performed by PFGE. Results Out of 531 episodes of bacteraemia, 135 were caused by E. coli. Seventeen of these cases involved ESBL-EC-producing strains (12.6%). In the multivariate analysis, female gender odds ratio (OR) 3.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–11.4 and previous antibiotic therapy (OR 3.22; 95% CI 1.00–10.3) were found to be independent risk factors for ESBL acquisition. An analysis of ESBL-EC isolates revealed a polyclonal distribution with CTX-M predominance (59%). Patients with ESBL-EC bacteraemia were more likely to have received an inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy (65% versus 6%; P = 0.000), and the time to adequate therapy was longer in this group (0 versus 1.50 days; P = 0.000). The overall mortality rate was 22%, ranging from 20% to 35% (P = 0.20). Risk factors for mortality were solid tumour (OR 19.41; 95% CI 4.66–80.83), corticosteroid therapy (OR 3.04 95% CI 1.05–8.81) and intensive care unit admission (OR 248.24, 95% CI 18.49–3332.14). In neutropenic patients, ESBL-EC bacteraemia was associated with poorer outcome and a higher overall mortality rate (37.5% versus 6.5%; P = 0.01). Conclusions In our centre, ESBL-EC bacteraemia is frequent among cancer patients, especially in those exposed to antibiotic pressure. All ESBL-EC strains were unrelated and most of them carried a CTX-M group enzyme. Patients with ESBL-EC bacteraemia received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy more frequently than patients carrying a susceptible strain, but significant differences in mortality could not be demonstrated.
•High prevalence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with bacteraemic pneumonia.•Resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam was related to the ...activity of VIM and GES carbapenemases.•High diversity of virulence factors was evident, including genes encoding type III secretion system and O serotype.•ST175 and ST235 were major high-risk P. aeruginosa clones with specific clonal backgrounds and distinct molecular markers.•Severe neutropenia, septic shock, inappropriate empirical antibiotics and XDR phenotype identified as prognostic factors.
Few studies have assessed the clinical and bacterial characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bacteraemic pneumonia (BP) episodes. This study analysed all non-duplicate PA-BP episodes from a tertiary hospital in 2013–2017. Epidemiology, clinical data, antimicrobial therapy and outcomes were recorded. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on PA blood isolates. The impact on early and late overall mortality of host, antimicrobial treatment and pathogen factors was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of 55 PA-BP episodes, 32 (58.2%) were caused by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) PA. ST175 (32.7%) and ST235 (25.5%) were the most frequent high-risk clones. β-Lactamases/carbapenemases were detected in 29 isolates, including blaVIM-2 (27.2%) and blaGES type (25.5%) blaGES-5 (20.0%), blaGES-1 (3.6%) and blaGES-20 (1.8%). The most prevalent O-antigen serotypes were O4 (34.5%) and O11 (30.9%). Overall, an extensive virulome was identified in all isolates. Early mortality (56.4%) was independently associated with severe neutropenia (aOR = 4.64, 95% CI 1.11–19.33; P = 0.035) and inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy (aOR = 5.71, 95% CI 1.41–22.98; P = 0.014). Additionally, late mortality (67.3%) was influenced by septic shock (aOR = 8.85, 95% CI 2.00–39.16; P = 0.004) and XDR phenotype (aOR = 5.46, 95% CI 1.25–23.85; P = 0.024). Moreover, specific genetic backgrounds ST235, blaGES, gyrA (T83I), parC (S87L), exoU and O11 serotype showed significant differences in patient outcomes. Our results confirm the high mortality associated with PA-BP. Besides relevant clinical characteristics and inappropriate empirical therapy, bacteria-specific genetics factors, such as XDR phenotype, adversely affect the outcome of PA-BP.
Colistin combination therapy may be required to treat biofilm-associated infections. We evaluated bacterial killing and emergence of colistin resistance with colistin and doripenem combinations ...against biofilm-embedded and planktonic multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
One colistin-susceptible reference strain (PAO1) and two colistin-susceptible MDR clinical isolates (HUB1 and HUB2; both carbapenem resistant) were investigated over 72 h in the CDC biofilm reactor, a dynamic biofilm model. Two colistin regimens (constant concentrations of 1.25 and 3.50 mg/L), one doripenem regimen (Cmax 25 mg/L 8 hourly) and their combination were employed. Microbiological response was examined as log changes and absolute bacterial counts.
For biofilm-embedded bacteria, bactericidal activity was only observed with monotherapy with colistin at 3.50 mg/L. The emergence of colistin resistance occurred with colistin monotherapy against two strains (PAO1 and HUB1), but only with the colistin 3.50 mg/L regimen. Colistin 3.50 mg/L plus doripenem resulted in ∼2-3 log10 cfu/cm(2) initial killing against both clinical isolates and remained synergistic at 72 h. The emergence of colistin resistance was not observed in biofilm-embedded bacteria with either combination. For planktonic bacteria, bactericidal activity was not observed with any monotherapy regimen, although enhanced bacterial killing was observed with doripenem plus colistin 3.50 mg/L against all isolates. Colistin resistance was observed with colistin monotherapy against two isolates, but did not emerge with combination regimens.
Doripenem enhanced killing by colistin of biofilm-embedded cells in both carbapenem-susceptible and -resistant strains, and the combination minimized the emergence of colistin resistance.
A 44-Year-Old Female With Overwhelming Sepsis Meléndez-Carmona, María Ángeles; Recio, Raúl; Lora-Tamayo, Jaime ...
Clinical infectious diseases,
06/2018, Volume:
66, Issue:
11
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
The organism was identified as Streptococcus pneumoniae by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. The isolate showed the serotype 23A and it was ...susceptible for optochin. It was also susceptible to penicillin, ceftriaxone, vancomycin, meropenem, clindamycin, and levofloxacin. She initiated therapy with ceftriaxone and immunoglobulins. However, her condition further deteriorated, and the patient died 48 hours after admission due to septic shock and multi-organ failure.
PK/PD models in antibacterial development Velkov, Tony; Bergen, Phillip J; Lora-Tamayo, Jaime ...
Current opinion in microbiology,
10/2013, Volume:
16, Issue:
5
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
Highlights • In vitro PK/PD models are less costly and resource-intensive and permit investigations of considerable duration which may not be feasible in animals. • Mouse thigh infection model is the ...gold standard for antibacterial PK/PD. • Animal infection models play a critical role in the preclinical assessment of novel antibiotics.
Abstract
Background
Prosthetic joints are at risk of becoming infected during an episode of bacteremia, especially during Staphylocococcus aureus bacteremia. However, it is unclear how often ...asymptomatic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs, and whether additional diagnostics should be considered.
Methods
In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with a late acute (hematogenous) PJI between 2005–2015 who had concomitant prosthetic joints in situ. Patients without at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded.
Results
We included 91 patients with a hematogenous PJI and 108 concomitant prosthetic joints. The incident PJI was most frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus (43%), followed by streptococci (26%) and Gram-negative rods (18%). Of 108 concomitant prosthetic joints, 13 were symptomatic, of which 10 were subsequently diagnosed as a second PJI. Of the 95 asymptomatic prosthetic joints, 1 PJI developed during the follow-up period and was classified as a “missed” PJI at the time of bacteremia with S. aureus (1.1%). Infected prosthetic joints were younger than the noninfected ones in 67% of cases, and prosthetic knees were affected more often than prosthetic hips (78%).
Conclusions
During an episode of hematogenous PJI, concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints have a very low risk of being infected, and additional diagnostic work-up for these joints is not necessary.
We evaluated a cohort of patients with hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection and concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints. We demonstrate that if a prosthetic joint is asymptomatic, the chance of infection is very low. These joints do not require additional diagnostic work-up.
Staphylococcus aureus may invade and persist intracellularly in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Despite optimized treatments with levofloxacin plus rifampin, the intracellular reservoir may lead ...to infection relapse. This study assessed the intracellular activity of levofloxacin and rifampin in an in-vitro model of human osteoblastic infection.
Ten meticillin-susceptible S. aureus strains were used to infect osteoblastic MG63 cells. Osteoblasts were challenged with rifampin and levofloxacin at cortical and cancellous bone concentrations. Efficacy was measured as the intracellular counts of colony-forming units (log10CFU) compared with untreated controls. The emergence of small colony variants (SCVs) was determined, and the results were stratified according to the patient's prognosis (six cured and four with persistence/relapse).
All regimes led to a significant decrease in CFU count compared with controls (1–2 log10CFU). Levofloxacin was the most effective treatment at both cortical and cancellous bone concentrations (-2.4 to -1.9 log10CFU, respectively). The addition of rifampin to levofloxacin did not improve performance (-1.9 log10CFU for cortical concentration and -1.8 log10 CFU for cancellous concentration). An increase in SCVs was observed in the presence of rifampin. The efficacy of antimicrobials was higher and the formation of SCVs was lower against strains belonging to PJIs with a favourable outcome.
Levofloxacin plus rifampin had good intracellular activity against S. aureus. However, from the intracellular perspective, the addition of rifampin to levofloxacin showed no benefit but could account for an increased number of SCVs.
•Late acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with surgical debridement and implant retention have a high failure rate.•The exchange of mobile components during surgical debridement is the ...most potent predictor for treatment success.•There are several preoperative patient related variables that increase the risk for failure.•Treatment strategies for late acute PJIs should be individualized and optimized according to the preoperative risk for failing.
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for all acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI), but its efficacy in patients with late acute (LA) PJI is not well described.
Patients diagnosed with LA PJI between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. LA PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms (≤ 3 weeks) occurring ≥ 3 months after arthroplasty. Failure was defined as: (i) the need for implant removal, (ii) infection related death, (iii) the need for suppressive antibiotic therapy and/or (iv) relapse or reinfection during follow-up.
340 patients from 27 centers were included. The overall failure rate was 45.0% (153/340). Failure was dominated by Staphylococcus aureus PJI (54.7%, 76/139). Significant independent preoperative risk factors for failure according to the multivariate analysis were: fracture as indication for the prosthesis (odds ratio (OR) 5.4), rheumatoid arthritis (OR 5.1), age above 80 years (OR 2.6), male gender (OR 2.0) and C-reactive protein > 150 mg/L (OR 2.0). Exchanging the mobile components during DAIR was the strongest predictor for treatment success (OR 0.35).
LA PJIs have a high failure rate. Treatment strategies should be individualized according to patients’ age, comorbidity, clinical presentation and microorganism causing the infection.