The recommended technique for colistin susceptibility testing by both EUCAST and CLSI is broth microdilution (BMD). However, many routine laboratories still use other methods such as gradient strips ...or semi-automated systems. The objective of this study was to compare six of the most widespread commercial products for colistin susceptibility testing in Europe with in-house prepared BMD.
A collection of 325 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales was tested for colistin susceptibility with three semi-automated systems (Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway), one gradient-strip test (Etest®) and two commercial BMD products (MICRONAUT-S, TREK Sensititre). BMD, in-house prepared according to ISO standard 20776-1, served as reference.
The MICRONAUT-S BMD performed best with only one false-resistant (major error, ME) and four false-susceptible (very major error, VME) results while the TREK BMD performed poorer with 16 ME and seven VME. The semi-automated systems Vitek 2 and Phoenix performed poorly with 31 and 26 VME, respectively. The WalkAway semi-automated system showed 16 and 13 false results, depending on the inoculation method. The Etest® showed six ME and 10 VME.
This study shows that colistin susceptibility testing remains a challenging task for laboratories. It emphasizes the need for selecting the most reliable test method to advocate proper treatment and shows that critical evaluation and precautious usage of colistin susceptibility testing results is constantly required.
A group of 24 patients were considered for noninvasive shock waves thrombolysis (NISWT). Of these, 15 patients gave their informed consent. NISWT was attempted in eight patients (while seven patients ...were randomized for follow-up only). NISWT was possible in six of seven patients. In one patient randomized for NISWT, local inguinal scarring, due to previous surgery, made impossible the visualization of the femoral vein, and therefore focusing of shock waves (SWs). No side effects were reported in the days after SWs administration during the 4-month follow-up. In patients treated with NISWT it was possible to observe just after the SWs session the presence of echolucent "acoustic holes" and flow (by color and power Doppler) within the "holes." All "echolucent holes" produced at the first session were still present at 4 months, and color flow imaging also detected new flow channels in echogenic areas of thrombi previously not visible. In one patient thrombolysis was achieved after the first treatment, but at 3 and 4 months the thrombus was completely avascular. In conclusion, thrombolysis using SWs was obtained in selected cases and it was still persisting at 4 months in six of the seven treated patients. NISWT appears feasible and promising. These results should be confirmed by larger, prospective trials.
Three human aortic specimens were used for this in-vitro study on the effects of shock waves on the arterial wall. Specimen one was from a normal (for age) healthy aorta. The full abdominal length ...was used (including mesenteric and renal arteries and the aortoiliac bifurcation), divided into six pieces (3 cm). The pieces were placed and fixed into degassed water. Shock waves (SW) were focused onto the aortic wall by means of a B-mode ultrasound imager. An SW generator (Minilith SL1, Storz Medical AG, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland) was used for setting of energy flux density between 0.03 and 0.5 mJ/mm2. The six aortic pieces (excluding piece 1, placed in water and left untreated as control) were treated with SW at increasing energy levels. A second aortic specimen of a man with arteriosclerotic plaques was also used and the experiment repeated at energy levels 1, 5, and 8. Another specimen of normal thoracic aorta was exposed at energy levels 1 and 8 only. Energy levels delivered onto the aortic walls were selected from theoretically destructive levels to minimal levels known not to alter vascular tissues. High-resolution ultrasounds of the aortic segments were performed with a 10 MHz high-resolution, broad-band (ATL 3000, USA) probe in water before and after SW application to detect structural changes in the wall after SW. Histology was performed with a standard hematoxylin-eosin staining.
The aortic pieces did not show macroscopic damages at visual examination, and at the ultrasound examination no visible changes were observed even at higher levels of SW energy. Also no effects were seen by histology. In conclusion, no damaging effects were observed, visually, by ultrasound, or by histology. At these energy levels SW appear to be safe and do not produce any damage to the aortic wall. Therefore, SW could be considered a safe, nondamaging procedure for potential treatment (ie, thrombolysis) in which vessel walls could be involved. Theoretically it is possible that functional changes could be observed in vivo including cell permeability modifications and other alterations (including changes in the potential of the cells in SW fields to modify themselves and to divide). At the energy levels described in this study SW could, theoretically be, safely used for vascular applications (ie, treating venous and arterial thrombi or in arterial plaques modification) without altering major, structural, arterial wall characteristics. Lesions or alterations that have a different density from the normal wall (thrombi or plaques) could be differently sensitive to the same dosage of SW. These differences in acoustic impedance characteristics could be used for potential treatments with SW without damaging the arterial wall.
Shock waves (SWs) are used to control and decrease pain in several clinical conditions (eg, painful elbow and shoulder, etc). This clinical effect may be due to cellular stunning of the tissues ...(particularly nervous components) in the area treated with SW. It may also be the consequence of unknown metabolic actions on tissues, which may include changes in cellular permeability and the liberation of proteins and mediators locally acting on pain and nerve endings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reduction in pain and the microcirculation improvement induced by SWs treatment in an 8-week study in patients with chronic limb ischemia (CLI). Patients with CLI (15 with rest pain only and 15 with rest pain and limited distal necrosis) were included. The treatment was based on a 30-minute SWs session, three times weekly for 2 weeks. Clinical and microcirculatory evaluation were performed with laser Doppler PO 2 and PCO2 measurements. Pain was measured with an analogue scale line. A Minilith SL1 (Storz Medical, Switzerland) litotriptor was used. The parabolic reflector is coupled to the skin with a silicon water cushion. Focal pressure was adjusted between 6 and 70 Mpa in eight steps. The energy flux density was variable from 0.03 to 0.5 mJ/mm2. Focal diameter and distance were defined (depth of target within the patient's foot of about 70 mm). The coded intensity used in this study was between 6 and 8 and the application time was 20 min (at four impulses per second). Twenty-eight of the 30 patients with CLI (15 with rest pain only and 13 with necrosis) completed the study. The treatment was well tolerated. Blood pressure was unchanged after 8 weeks while the increase in laser Doppler flux was significant (p<0.05) (at all measurements after treatment). The ORACLE score at 1 and 8 weeks was decreased (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed with the analogue scale line for pain (p < 0.05). PO2 increased (p < 0.05) and PCO2 decreased (p < 0.05). Tibial pressure did not change. All patients observed an increase in their subjective pain-free walking distance. The improvement was still present after 8 weeks. In a separate subset of 37 patients (mean age 60 ±9 years; males) with CLI, a SWs dose-finding evaluation was performed. Flux changes were measured at the dorsum of the foot. Three treatment plans were used: (a) 20-minute SW treatment only once; (b) 20-minute SWs treatment every 2 days for 1 week; (c) 20 minutes every day for 1 week. Treatments were well tolerated. A different increase in flux was observed on the basis of different treatments. Flux vari ations generally indicated that increased SWs dosage was associated with proportional flux increase. Flux improvement was still present after 4 weeks. SWs treatment in CLI produced changes both in the microcirculation and on pain. These preliminary results are comforting and open new research options to be explored in the near future.