Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the ...efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Methods Between May 15, 2005, and Nov 2, 2009, we enrolled patients with confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma, age older than 65 years, and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg/m2 temozolomide, given on days 1–7 of 1 week on, 1 week off cycles, or radiotherapy of 60·0 Gy, administered over 6–7 weeks in 30 fractions of 1·8–2·0 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We assessed non-inferiority with a 25% margin, analysed for all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01502241. Findings Of 584 patients screened, we enrolled 412. 373 patients (195 randomly allocated to the temozolomide group and 178 to the radiotherapy group) received at least one dose of treatment and were included in efficacy analyses. Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·3–10·2) in the temozolomide group versus 9·6 months (8·2–10·8) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio HR 1·09, 95% CI 0·84–1·42, pnon-inferiority =0·033). Median event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between the temozolomide and radiotherapy groups (3·3 months 95% CI 3·2–4·1 vs 4·7 4·2–5·2; HR 1·15, 95% CI 0·92–1·43, pnon-inferiority =0·043). Tumour MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 73 (35%) of 209 patients tested. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer overall survival than was unmethylated status (11·9 months 95% CI 9·0 to not reached vs 8·2 months 7·0–10·0; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·42–0·91, p=0·014). EFS was longer in patients with MGMT promoter methylation who received temozolomide than in those who underwent radiotherapy (8·4 months 95e% CI 5·5–11·7 vs 4·6 4·2–5·0), whereas the opposite was true for patients with no methylation of the MGMT promoter (3·3 months 3·0–3·5 vs 4·6 months 3·7–6·3). The most frequent grade 3–4 intervention-related adverse events were neutropenia (16 patients in the temozolomide group vs two in the radiotherapy group), lymphocytopenia (46 vs one), thrombocytopenia (14 vs four), raised liver-enzyme concentrations (30 vs 16), infections (35 vs 23), and thromboembolic events (24 vs eight). Interpretation Temozolomide alone is non-inferior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma. MGMT promoter methylation seems to be a useful biomarker for outcomes by treatment and could aid decision-making. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Summary Neurological complications of cancer and of anticancer treatments can be substantially disabling to patients, especially with classic chemotherapies. As a rare but important complication, ...targeted therapies might also result in similar unwanted effects, partly because inhibition of VEGF is a common downstream effect. Therapeutic antibodies, such as the CD20-depleting antibody rituximab, and underlying haematological malignancies, can induce long-lasting cellular immunosuppression, predisposing patients to opportunistic CNS infections, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, where treatment-induced recovery can result in severe reconstitution of immune inflammatory syndromes of the central nervous system. Immune-related neurological adverse events, particularly from immune-activating checkpoint inhibitors, occur as a result of immune activation, resulting in organ-specific autoimmune-like disease. The prevalence of immune-related neurological adverse events might only be about 1%—a low prevalence compared with toxicities in other organs—but it constitutes new patterns of neurological toxic forms, which could result in considerable morbidity and fatal outcomes. Clinicians should be aware of treatment-associated neurotoxicity, and consider discontinuation of the drug with parallel supportive measures to help patients.
Summary Background The WHO classification of brain tumours describes 15 subtypes of meningioma. Nine of these subtypes are allotted to WHO grade I, and three each to grade II and grade III. Grading ...is based solely on histology, with an absence of molecular markers. Although the existing classification and grading approach is of prognostic value, it harbours shortcomings such as ill-defined parameters for subtypes and grading criteria prone to arbitrary judgment. In this study, we aimed for a comprehensive characterisation of the entire molecular genetic landscape of meningioma to identify biologically and clinically relevant subgroups. Methods In this multicentre, retrospective analysis, we investigated genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of meningiomas from ten European academic neuro-oncology centres to identify distinct methylation classes of meningiomas. The methylation classes were further characterised by DNA copy number analysis, mutational profiling, and RNA sequencing. Methylation classes were analysed for progression-free survival outcomes by the Kaplan-Meier method. The DNA methylation-based and WHO classification schema were compared using the Brier prediction score, analysed in an independent cohort with WHO grading, progression-free survival, and disease-specific survival data available, collected at the Medical University Vienna (Vienna, Austria), assessing methylation patterns with an alternative methylation chip. Findings We retrospectively collected 497 meningiomas along with 309 samples of other extra-axial skull tumours that might histologically mimic meningioma variants. Unsupervised clustering of DNA methylation data clearly segregated all meningiomas from other skull tumours. We generated genome-wide DNA methylation profiles from all 497 meningioma samples. DNA methylation profiling distinguished six distinct clinically relevant methylation classes associated with typical mutational, cytogenetic, and gene expression patterns. Compared with WHO grading, classification by individual and combined methylation classes more accurately identifies patients at high risk of disease progression in tumours with WHO grade I histology, and patients at lower risk of recurrence among WHO grade II tumours (p=0·0096) from the Brier prediction test). We validated this finding in our independent cohort of 140 patients with meningioma. Interpretation DNA methylation-based meningioma classification captures clinically more homogenous groups and has a higher power for predicting tumour recurrence and prognosis than the WHO classification. The approach presented here is potentially very useful for stratifying meningioma patients to observation-only or adjuvant treatment groups. We consider methylation-based tumour classification highly relevant for the future diagnosis and treatment of meningioma. Funding German Cancer Aid, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, and DKFZ/Heidelberg Institute of Personalized Oncology/Precision Oncology Program.
PDF
