More than 90% of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed with a single-arterial bypass graft (SABG), based on the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) with supplemental vein grafts. This ...practice, often justified by safety concerns with multiple-arterial grafting (MABG), defies evidence of improved late survival achieved with bilateral ITA (BITA-MABG) or left ITA plus radial artery (RA-MABG). We hypothesized that MABG and SABG are equally safe.
We analyzed The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database (2004 to 2015) to assess the operative safety of BITA-MABG (n = 73,054) and RA-MABG (n = 97,623) vs SABG (n = 1,334,511). Primary end points were operative (30-day or same hospitalization) mortality (OM) and deep sternal wound infections (DSWI). Risk-adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from by logistic regression with sensitivity analyses in multiple subcohorts including MABG use rate.
SABG (73.8% men; median age, 66 years), BITA-MABG (85.1% men; median age, 59 years), and RA-MABG (82.5% men; median age, 61 years) showed distinctly different patient characteristics. Compared with SABG (1.91% OM; 0.73% DSWI), observed OM was lower for BITA-MABG (1.19%, p < 0.001) and RA-MABG (1.19%, p < 0.001). DSWI was higher among BITA-MABG (1.08%, p < 0.001) and similar for RA-MABG (0.71%, p = 0.55). BITA-MABG showed marginally increased, likely not clinically significant, OM (AOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.30; p = 0.05) and doubled DSWI (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.43; p < 0.001). RA-MABG had similar OM (AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.15; p = 0.85) and DSWI (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.13; p = 0.70). Results were consistent across multiple subcohorts. A U-shaped OM vs BITA use relation was documented, with worse OM at hospitals with low (<5%: AOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.61; p < 0.001) and high (≥40%: AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.70; p = 0.049) BITA use.
MABG in the United States is associated with OM comparable to SABG and increased DSWI risk with BITA-MABG. Our findings highlight the importance of surgeon and institutional experience and careful patient selection for BITA-MABG. Our short-term results should not in any way dissuade the use of MABG, given its well-established long-term survival advantage.
Using urinary biomarkers to reduce acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery Engelman, Daniel T.; Crisafi, Cheryl; Germain, Michael ...
Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery/The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery/The journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery,
November 2020, 2020-11-00, Volume:
160, Issue:
5
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
Prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery is unreliable through the use of serum creatinine or urinary output alone. Cell cycle arrest urinary biomarkers insulin-like growth ...factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP2) provide early detection of kidney stress and possibly AKI. We sought to determine whether therapeutic interventions driven by elevated urinary biomarkers (UB) reduces post–cardiac surgery stage 2/3 AKI.
A quality improvement initiative based on UB was undertaken in all adult on-pump cardiac surgical patients with a preoperative serum creatinine level ≤2.0 mg/dL. A UB score the morning after cardiac surgery that was considered positive for kidney stress (≥0.3 ng/mL2/1000) triggered activation of a multidisciplinary acute kidney response team (AKRT) with implementation of a predefined staged protocol, including targeted goal-directed fluid management, liberalized transfusion thresholds, continued invasive hemodynamic monitoring and its optimization in the intensive care unit, and avoidance of nephrotoxins. We compared the incidence of stage 2/3 AKI before (pre-UB) versus after (post-UB) implementation of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes quality improvement initiative. Standardized, protocolized, evidence-based care pathways were used pre-UB.
The incidence of stage 2/3 AKI was compared in 435 pre-UB patients and 412 post-UB patients. Fifty-five percent of the post-UB patients had a moderate or high UB score (≥0.3 ng/mL2/1000). Ten patients (2.30%) had stage 2/3 AKI pre-UB, compared with 1 patient (0.24%) post-UB, a relative reduction of 89% (P = .01). The total and postoperative lengths of stay, cost, mortality, and readmissions were similar in the 2 groups. The negative predictive value for AKI of UB <0.3 ng/mL2/1000 was 100%.
The routine measurement of UB and subsequent activation of an AKRT are useful post–cardiac surgery therapeutic adjuncts. They are associated with early detection of kidney stress, allowing for targeted proactive intervention, and a significant decrease in postoperative stage 2/3 AKI without increases in cost or length of stay.
Response to urinary biomarkers drawn the morning after cardiac surgery. Display omitted
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Multi-arterial bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic (BITA-MABG) or radial (RA-MABG) arteries improves long-term survival, but its increased complexity raises ...perioperative safety concerns. We compared perioperative outcomes of RA-MABG and BITA-MABG using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS-ACSD).
METHODS
We analysed the 2004–2015 BITA-MABG and RA-MABG experience in STS-ACSD. Primary end points were operative mortality (OM) and deep sternal wound infections (DSWI). Risk-adjusted odds ratios AOR (95% confidence interval) were derived via multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were done in patient sub-cohorts and based on institutional BITA-utilization rates (<5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–40% and >40%).
RESULTS
Eighty-five thousand nine hundred five RA-MABG (82.5% men; 61 years) and 61 336 BITA-MABG (85.1% men; 59 years) patients were analysed; 41.6% of BITA-MABG and 27.3% of RA-MABG cases came from institutions with low MABG utilization rates (<10%). Unadjusted OM was equivalent for both techniques (BITA-MABG versus RA-MABG: 1.3% vs 1.2%, P = 0.79), while DSWI was lower for RA-MABG (1.0% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001). RA-MABG was associated with lower adjusted OM AOR = 0.80 (0.69–0.96) and DSWI AOR = 0.39 (0.32–0.46). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of these findings. Equivalent outcomes were observed at high BITA-use institutions where BITA cases comprised >20% of all cases for OM and ≥40% for DSWI.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis of the STS-ACSD showed that RA-MABG is a generally safer form of multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. However, this advantage is mitigated at institutions with substantial BITA experience.
We aimed to elucidate current national multiarterial coronary bypass grafting practice patterns and assess perioperative outcomes.
Isolated primary nonemergent/nonsalvage coronary artery bypass ...grafting patients with at least 1 internal thoracic artery and 2 or more grafts in The Society of Thoracic Surgery Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2018-2019) were divided into 3 cohorts: single-arterial, bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA), and radial artery multiarterial grafting. Observed-to-expected ratios based on 2017 Society of Thoracic Surgery risk models were derived for 30-day perioperative mortality, composite major morbidity and mortality, and deep sternal wound infections for each grafting group overall and as a function of institutional multiarterial case volumes per study period: low (<10), intermediate (11-30), and high (>30).
A total of 281,515 patients (BITA, 15,663 5.6%; radial, 23,905 8.5%) at 1013 centers showed distinct geographic grafting patterns: BITA and radial multiarterial grafting rates were lowest in the South (4% and 6%, respectively) and highest in the Northeast (9% and 11%, respectively). The median institutional number of BITA and radial cases per study period was 4 and 7, with only 14% and 21% of institutions performing >30 BITA and radial multiarterial cases per study period, respectively. The observed-to-expected mortality for single-arterial bypass grafting was similar to multiarterial: single-arterial, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.03); BITA, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84-1.13; P = .711); and radial, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.86-1.07; P = .818). Observed-to-expected mortality and composite major morbidity and mortality were lower at high vs low multiarterial case-volume centers: 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75-1.08) vs 1.30 (95% CI, 0.89-1.79; P = .048) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.99-1.13) vs 1.51 (95% CI, 1.32-1.71; P < .001), respectively, for BITA, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.87-1.30) vs 1.67 (95% CI, 1.21-2.21; P < .001) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.93-1.08) vs 1.42 (95% CI, 1.24-1.61; P < .001), respectively, for radial.
Multiarterial bypass grafting remains underused and limited to select centers. Worse outcomes at low-volume BITA and radial institutions document a case-volume outcomes effect. Additional studies are warranted to improve multiarterial outcomes at low-volume institutions.
It is not clear whether radial artery (RA), right internal thoracic artery (RITA), or saphenous vein (SV) is the preferred second bypass graft during coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the ...left internal thoracic artery (LITA) in patients aged less or greater than 70 years.
Late survival data were collected for 13,324 consecutive, isolated, primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients from three hospitals. Cox regression analysis was performed on all patients grouped by age.
Adjusted Cox regression showed overall better RA versus SV survival (hazard ratio HR 0.82, p < 0.001) and no difference in RITA versus SV survival (HR 0.95, p = 0.35). However, the survival benefit of RA versus SV was seen only in patients aged less than 70 years (HR 0.77, p < 0.001); and RITA patients aged less than 70 years also had a survival benefit compared with SV (HR 0.86, p = 0.03). There was no difference in survival for RA versus RITA across all ages.
For patients aged less than 70 years, the optimal grafting strategy is using either RA or RITA as the second preferred graft. In patients aged 70 years or more, RA and RITA grafting should be used selectively. Multiple arterial grafting using either RA or RITA should be more widely utilized during coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients less than 70 years of age.
PDF
