•This updated ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations on the management of marginal zone lymphomas.•Authorship includes a multidisciplinary group of experts from different ...institutions and countries in Europe and abroad.•A summary of recommendations is provided, including levels of evidence and grades of recommendation where applicable.•The distinct disease entities (i.e. extranodal, nodal and splenic marginal zone lymphomas) are discussed separately.•Organ-specific peculiarities are addressed in the recommendations for extranodal marginal zone lymphomas (MALT lymphomas).
We analyzed the prognostic value of a new baseline positron emission tomography (PET) parameter reflecting the spread of the disease, the largest distance between two lesions (Dmax). We tested its ...complementarity to metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in a large cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients from the REMARC trial (NCT01122472).
MTVs were defined using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value threshold. From the three-dimensional coordinates, the centroid of each lesion was automatically obtained and considered as the lesion location. The distances between all pairs were calculated. Dmax was obtained for each patient and normalized with the body surface area standardized Dmax (SDmax).
From the REMARC trial, 290 patients aged 60-80 years were included: 91% had an advanced stage and 71% International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥3. High versus low SDmax significantly impacted progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0027). Patients with SDmax > 0.32 m−1 (n = 82) had a 4-year PFS and OS of 46% and 71%, respectively, against 77% and 87%, respectively, for patients with low SDmax. High SDmax and high MTV were independent prognostic factors of PFS (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0010, respectively) and OS (P = 0.0028 and P = 0.0004, respectively). Combining MTV and SDmax yielded three risk groups with no (n = 109), one (n = 122) or two (n = 59) factors (P < 0.0001 for both PFS and OS). The 4-year PFS were 90%, 63%, 41%, respectively, and the 4-year OS were 95%, 79%, 66%, respectively. In addition, patients with at least two of the three factors including high SDmax, high MTV, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥2 had a higher number of central nervous system relapse (P = 0.017).
SDmax is a simple feature that captures lymphoma dissemination, independent from MTV. These two PET metrics, SDmax and MTV, are complementary to characterize the disease, reflecting the tumor burden and its spread. This score appeared promising for DLBCL baseline risk stratification.
•Large lesion dissemination measured by high SDmax was a strong prognosticator of shorter PFS and OS in DLBCL patients.•SDmax results in an accurate risk stratification at baseline, even in advanced Ann Arbor stage patients.•SDmax and MTV are independent prognosticators and identified a high-risk group among DLBCL patients responding to R-CHOP.•SDmax combined with MTV seems superior to IPI or NCCN-IPI stratifications and promises to guide therapeutic strategy.
Copanlisib is a pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor with predominant activity against the α- and δ-isoforms.
This phase II study evaluated the response rate of copanlisib administered ...intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, in patients with indolent or aggressive malignant lymphoma. Archival tumor tissues were used for immunohistochemistry, gene-expression profiling, and mutation analysis.
Thirty-three patients with indolent lymphoma and 51 with aggressive lymphoma received copanlisib. Follicular lymphoma (48.5%) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (33.3%) were the most common histologic subtypes. Most patients (78.6%) had received prior rituximab and 54.8% were rituximab-refractory. Median duration of treatment was 23 and 8 weeks in the indolent and aggressive cohorts, respectively (overall range 2–138). Eighty patients were evaluated for efficacy. The objective response rate was 43.7% (14/32) in the indolent cohort and 27.1% (13/48) in the aggressive cohort; median progression-free survival was 294 days (range 0–874) and 70 days (range 0–897), respectively; median duration of response was 390 days (range 0–825) and 166 days (range 0–786), respectively. Common adverse events included hyperglycemia (57.1%; grade ≥3, 23.8%), hypertension (54.8%; grade ≥3, 40.5%), and diarrhea (40.5%; grade ≥3, 4.8%), all generally manageable. Neutropenia occurred in 28.6% of patients (grade 4, 11.9%). Molecular analyses showed enhanced antitumor activity in tumors with upregulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene expression.
Intravenous copanlisib demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with various subtypes of indolent and aggressive malignant lymphoma. Subtype-specific studies of copanlisib in patients with follicular, peripheral T-cell, and mantle cell lymphomas are ongoing.
This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01660451 (Part A).
Several commercial and academic autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products targeting CD19 have been approved in Europe for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ...high-grade B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Products for other diseases such as multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma are likely to be approved by the European Medicines Agency in the near future.
The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association collaborated to draft best practice recommendations based on the current literature to support health care professionals in delivering consistent, high-quality care in this rapidly moving field.
Thirty-six CAR-T experts (medical, nursing, pharmacy/laboratory) assembled to draft recommendations to cover all aspects of CAR-T patient care and supply chain management, from patient selection to long-term follow-up, post-authorisation safety surveillance and regulatory issues.
We provide practical, clinically relevant recommendations on the use of these high-cost, logistically complex therapies for haematologists/oncologists, nurses and other stakeholders including pharmacists and health sector administrators involved in the delivery of CAR-T in the clinic.
Pharmacological agents that inhibit enzymes of the B‐cell receptor (BCR) pathway are of increasing importance in the treatment of B‐cell malignancies. These include inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine ...kinase (BTK), phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K), splenic tyrosine kinase and protein kinase Cβ. Two agents are already approved in the USA and Europe: ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, for the treatment of chronic lymphatic leukaemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia; and idelalisib, a PI3Kδ inhibitor, for the treatment of CLL and follicular lymphoma. In addition, the role of these drugs in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma is under investigation, as single agents and in combination with chemotherapy. In CLL, both ibrutinib and idelalisib have an established role as first‐line therapy in patients with del(17p), and in MCL, ibrutinib is a standard option for patients relapsing after chemoimmunotherapy. Unexpected toxicities have been encountered when combining these potent new agents with other drugs, including chemotherapy and lenalidomide, and based on this experience the risks and benefits of novel combinations must be evaluated carefully. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety results with these inhibitors and discuss novel combinations that are under study and the future role of BCR inhibitors in these disorders.
Content List ‐ Read more articles from the symposium: Targeted therapy in B‐cell malignancies.
In recent years, the number of approved and investigational agents that can be safely administered for the treatment of lymphoma patients for a prolonged period of time has substantially increased. ...Many of these novel agents are evaluated in early-phase clinical trials in patients with a wide range of malignancies, including solid tumors and lymphoma. Furthermore, with the advances in genome sequencing, new “basket” clinical trial designs have emerged that select patients based on the presence of specific genetic alterations across different types of solid tumors and lymphoma. The standard response criteria currently in use for lymphoma are the Lugano Criteria which are based on 18F2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography or bidimensional tumor measurements on computerized tomography scans. These differ from the RECIST criteria used in solid tumors, which use unidimensional measurements. The RECIL group hypothesized that single-dimension measurement could be used to assess response to therapy in lymphoma patients, producing results similar to the standard criteria. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing 47 828 imaging measurements from 2983 individual adult and pediatric lymphoma patients enrolled on 10 multicenter clinical trials and developed new lymphoma response criteria (RECIL 2017). We demonstrate that assessment of tumor burden in lymphoma clinical trials can use the sum of longest diameters of a maximum of three target lesions. Furthermore, we introduced a new provisional category of a minor response. We also clarified response assessment in patients receiving novel immune therapy and targeted agents that generate unique imaging situations.
To complement the existing treatment guidelines for all tumour types, ESMO organizes consensus conferences to focus on specific issues in each type of tumour. In this setting, a consensus conference ...on the management of lymphoma was held on 18 June 2011 in Lugano, next to the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma. The conference convened ∼30 experts from all around Europe, and selected six lymphoma entities to be addressed; for each of them, three to five open questions were to be addressed by the experts. For each question, a recommendation should be given by the panel, referring to the strength of the recommendation based on the level of evidence. This consensus report focuses on the three less common lymphoproliferative malignancies: marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas. A first report had focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Maintenance therapy has proven efficacy in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), yet its role in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an area of ongoing investigation. While DLBCL is potentially ...curable,>30% of patients relapse following front-line therapy and have a poor prognosis, especially those with refractory disease. Maintenance therapy holds promise to maintain response post-induction.
Keyword searches were carried out in PubMed and congress abstracts of ‘diffuse large B-cell lymphoma’ and ‘maintenance’ and focused on phase II/III studies of maintenance following front-line induction.
Although used in indolent forms of NHL, studies of maintenance therapy with rituximab in patients with DLBCL responding to front-line R-CHOP (rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) have not improved efficacy and are not recommended. Targeted agents enzastaurin and everolimus reported results from the phase III studies PRELUDE and PILLAR-2, respectively, both of which showed no proven maintenance benefit following front-line chemoimmunotherapy induction. Overall, the reported efficacy results with these agents in the maintenance setting do not outweigh the risks. Lenalidomide for maintenance has been reported in three studies. Results from two phase II trials on lenalidomide maintenance revealed positive outcomes in higher-risk patients following induction, resulting in improved progression-free survival in relapsed DLBCL patients who were ineligible for transplantation. First analysis from the phase III REMARC trial showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival for lenalidomide versus placebo, with no difference in overall survival, following front-line R-CHOP induction in elderly patients.
Based on currently available studies of DLBCL maintenance therapies, initial results in front-line, as well as the relapsed setting, with immunomodulators such as lenalidomide show promise for further research to identify appropriate patients who would most benefit. Overall, this review of maintenance studies underscores the need for additional analyses of patient subtypes, clinical risk status, and molecular profiles, with careful consideration of study end points.
PDF
