Neurological manifestations are not uncommon during infection with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A clear association has been reported between ...cerebrovascular disease and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, whether this association is causal or incidental is still unknown. In this narrative review, we sought to present the possible pathophysiological mechanisms linking COVID-19 and cerebrovascular disease, describe the stroke syndromes and their prognosis and discuss several clinical, radiological, and laboratory characteristics that may aid in the prompt recognition of cerebrovascular disease during COVID-19. A systematic literature search was conducted, and relevant information was abstracted. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor dysregulation, uncontrollable immune reaction and inflammation, coagulopathy, COVID-19-associated cardiac injury with subsequent cardio-embolism, complications due to critical illness and prolonged hospitalization can all contribute as potential etiopathogenic mechanisms leading to diverse cerebrovascular clinical manifestations. Acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis have been described in case reports and cohorts of COVID-19 patients with a prevalence ranging between 0.5% and 5%. SARS-CoV-2-positive stroke patients have higher mortality rates, worse functional outcomes at discharge and longer duration of hospitalization as compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative stroke patients in different cohort studies. Specific demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics may be used as ‘red flags’ to alarm clinicians in recognizing COVID-19-related stroke.
Background
Data are sparse regarding the safety of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective
To estimate (1) the pooled ...proportion of MS patients experiencing relapse among vaccine recipients; (2) the rate of transient neurological worsening, adverse events, and serious adverse events; (3) the previous outcomes of interest for different SARS-CoV-2 vaccine types.
Methods
Systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacovigilance registries and observational studies.
Results
Nineteen observational studies comprising 14,755 MS patients who received 23,088 doses of COVID-19 vaccines were included. Mean age was 43.3 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 40–46.6); relapsing-remitting, secondary-progressive, primary-progressive MS and clinically isolated syndrome were diagnosed in 82.6% (95% CI: 73.9–89.8), 12.6% (95% CI: 6.3–20.8), 6.7% (95% CI: 4.2–9.9), and 2.9% (95% CI: 1–5.9) of cases, respectively. The pooled proportion of MS patients experiencing relapse at a mean time interval of 20 days (95% CI: 12–28.2) from vaccination was 1.9% (95% CI: 1.3%–2.6%; I2 = 78%), with the relapse risk being independent of the type of administered SARS-CoV-2-vaccine (p for subgroup differences = 0.7 for messenger RNA (mRNA), inactivated virus, and adenovector-based vaccines). After vaccination, transient neurological worsening was observed in 4.8% (95% CI: 2.3%–8.1%) of patients. Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in 52.8% (95% CI: 46.7%–58.8%) and 0.1% (95% CI: 0%–0.2%) of vaccinations, respectively.
Conclusion
COVID-19 vaccination does not appear to increase the risk of relapse and serious adverse events in MS. Weighted against the risks of SARS-CoV-2-related complications and MS exacerbations, these safety data provide compelling pro-vaccination arguments for MS patients.
Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection related to devastating outcomes. Recently, interest has been shifted towards apoptotic and antiapoptotic pathobiology. Apoptosis is executed ...through the activation of caspases regulated by a number of antiapoptotic proteins, such as survivin. The survivin and caspases' responses to sepsis have not yet been elucidated. This is a multicenter prospective observational study concerning patients with sepsis (n = 107) compared to patients with traumatic systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (n = 75) and to healthy controls (n = 89). The expression of survivin was quantified through real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the different survivin splice variants (wild type-WT, ΔEx3, 2B, 3B) in peripheral blood leukocytes. The apoptotic or antiapoptotic tendency was specified by measuring survivin-WT, caspase-3, and -9 serum protein concentrations through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The survivin-WT, -2B, -ΔΕx3 mRNA, survivin protein, and caspases showed an escalated increase in SIRS and sepsis, whereas survivin-3B was repressed in sepsis (p < 0.05). Survivin correlated with IL-8 and caspase-9 (p < 0.01). For discriminating sepsis, caspase-9 achieved the best receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.95. In predicting mortality, caspase-9 and survivin protein achieved an AUROC of 0.70. In conclusion, specific apoptotic and antiapoptotic pathways might represent attractive targets for future research in sepsis.
A small but significant proportion of COVID‐19 patients develop life‐threatening cytokine storm. We have developed a new anti‐inflammatory drug, EXO‐CD24, a combination of an immune checkpoint (CD24) ...and a delivery platform (exosomes). CD24 inhibits the NF‐kB pathway and the production of cytokines/chemokines. EXO‐CD24 discriminates damage‐from pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs and PAMPs) therefore does not interfere with viral clearance. EXO‐CD24 was produced and purified from CD24‐expressing 293‐TREx™ cells. Exosomes displaying murine CD24 (mCD24) were also created. EXO‐CD24/mCD24 were characterized and examined, for safety and efficacy, in vitro and in vivo. In a phase Ib/IIa study, 35 patients with moderate–high severity COVID‐19 were recruited and given escalating doses, 108–1010, of EXO‐CD24 by inhalation, QD, for 5 days. No adverse events related to the drug were observed up to 443–575 days. EXO‐CD24 effectively reduced inflammatory markers and cytokine/chemokine, although randomized studies are required. EXO‐CD24 may be a treatment strategy to suppress the hyper‐inflammatory response in the lungs of COVID‐19 patients and further serve as a therapeutic platform for other pulmonary and systemic diseases characterized by cytokine storm.
Synopsis
In 5% of COVID‐19 patients, 5–10 days from disease onset, there is rapid clinical deterioration due to the cytokine storm with no effective therapy. EXO‐CD24 is the new immunomodulator with promising efficacy without interfering with pathogen clearance.
EXO‐CD24 is a novel platform that helps normalize immune activity.
EXO‐CD24 may represent a new therapeutic opportunity to overcome the devastating effect of COVID‐19 and beyond.
EXO‐CD24 leads to inhibition of tissue injury‐driven inflammation without interfering with pathogen‐induced immune activation.
EXO‐CD24 is a targeted innovative technology, based on CD24‐enriched exosomes, delivered directly to the lungs to suppress the cytokine storm, and has broad applicability.
In 5% of COVID‐19 patients, 5–10 days from disease onset, there is rapid clinical deterioration due to the cytokine storm with no effective therapy. EXO‐CD24 is the new immunomodulator with promising efficacy without interfering with pathogen clearance.
COVID-19 pandemic, as another disease emerging in the interface between animals and humans, has revealed the importance of interdisciplinary collaborations such as the One Health initiative. ...Environmental Health, whose role in the One Health concept is well established, has been associated with COVID-19 pandemic via various direct and indirect pathways. Modern lifestyle, climate change, environmental degradation, exposure to chemicals such as endocrine disruptors, and exposure to psychological stress factors impact human health negatively. As a result, many people are in the disadvantageous position to face the pandemic with an already impaired immune system due to their exposure to environmental health hazards. Moreover, the ongoing pandemic has been associated with outdoor and indoor air pollution, water and noise pollution, food security, and plastic pollution issues. Also, the inadequate infrastructure, the lack of proper waste and wastewater management, and the unequal social vulnerability reveal more linkages between Environmental Health and COVID-19 pandemic. The significant emerging ecological risk and its subsequent health implications require immediate risk analysis and risk communication strategies.
The severe respiratory insufficiency observed during COVID-19 infection may not be directly related to a cytopathogenic effect induced by the virus itself, but to an exaggerated and inappropriate ...immune response. In an effort to reduce the severity of organ dysfunction, including respiratory insufficiency, monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) that block the interleukin-6 receptor, such as tocilizumab, sarilumab, and siltuximab, are under investigation for the treatment of COVID-19. However, blocking of just one of the many cytokines involved in the inflammatory reaction may not slow down the magnitude of the process. Since timing is important, the immune deficiency induced by IL6 blockade at the late immunodeficiency phase of sepsis that follows the initial inflammatory response may be detrimental. Finally, monitoring the degree and duration of IL6 blockade may be challenging because of the long half-life of Mabs (2–3 weeks). Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines act through a common JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which can be inhibited by JAK-STAT inhibitors. Ruxolitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for JAK1, 2, blocks many pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL6. Ruxolitinib has favorable pharmacodynamics and an acceptable safety profile. The short half-life (4–6 h) of the drug offers the opportunity for ideal monitoring of the degree and duration of cytokine blocking, simply by the adjusting dose and duration of therapy. From a theoretical point of view, the balanced control of cytokine blockade throughout the course of the septic process should be the cornerstone of modern management. According to this hypothesis, maximization of blocking should be attempted at the phase of hyper-inflammation for preventing severe organ damage, while pro-inflammatory blockade should be minimized at the late phase of immunoparalysis for prevention of secondary infections. Based on the above considerations, we consider that the efficacy and safety of this drug deserves testing in the context of a controlled randomized trial.
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) blockade has emerged as a useful therapy for collagen vascular diseases or graft-vs-host disease. Fungal infections complicating such therapy have been reported ...sporadically. MEDLINE and PubMed databases (from January 1, 1966, to June 1, 2007) were searched for reports of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) associated with the 3 available anti-TNF-α agents, ie, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab. Of the 281 cases of IFI associated with TNF-α inhibition, 226 (80%) were associated with infliximab, 44 (16%) with etanercept, and 11 (4%) with adalimumab. Fungal infections associated with infliximab occurred a median of 55 days (interquartile range IQR, 15-140 days) after initiation of therapy and 3 infusions of the medication (IQR, 2-5), whereas those associated with etanercept occurred a median of 144 days (IQR, 46-240 days) after initiation of therapy. The median age of patients was 58 years (IQR, 44-68 years), and 62% were male. Use of at least 1 other immunosuppressant medication, typically a systemic corticosteroid, was reported during the course of the fungal infection in 102 (98%) of the 104 patients for whom data were available. The most prevalent IFIs were histoplasmosis (n=84 30%), candidiasis (n=64 23%), and aspergillosis (n=64 23%). Pneumonia was the most common pattern of infection. Of the 90 (32%) of 281 cases for which outcome information was available, 29 fatalities (32%) were recorded. Tumor necrosis factor α blockade is associated with IFI across a range of host groups. A high index of suspicion in patients treated with TNF-α antagonists is recommended because the course of such infections can be serious or fulminant, and rapid access to health care should be provided. Surveillance of IFIs complicating TNF-α blockade and other biologic therapies is warranted through well-organized prospective patient registries.
PDF
