In recent years the introduction of target therapies with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (MAPKi) and of immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies have dramatically improved survival ...of metastatic melanoma patients. Despite these changes drug resistance remains a major hurdle. Several mechanisms are at the basis of drug resistance. Particular attention has been devoted over the last years to unravel mechanisms at the basis of adaptive/non genetic resistance occurring in BRAF mutated melanomas upon treatment with to MAPKi. In this paper we focus on the involvement of activation of ErbB3 receptor following early exposure of melanoma cells to BRAF or MEK inhibitors, and the following induction of PI3K/AKT pathway. Although different mechanisms have been invoked in the past at the basis of this activation we show here with a combination of approaches that autocrine production of neuregulin by melanoma cells is a major factor responsible for ErbB3 phosphorylation and downstream AKT activation. Interestingly the kinetic of neuregulin production and of the ensuing ErbB3 phosphorylation is different in different melanoma cell lines which underscores the high degree of tumor heterogeneity. Moreover, heterogeneity is further highlighted by the evidence that in different cell lines neuregulin upregulation can occur at the transcriptional or at the post-transcritpional level. Finally we complement our study by showing with a liquid biopsy assay that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from melanoma patients undergo upregulation of ErbB3 phosphorylation in vivo shortly after initiation of therapy.
Fatigue was reported as the most common any-grade adverse event (18.3%), and the most common grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse event (irAE) (0.89%) in patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint ...inhibitors in clinical trial.
The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the correlations between "early ir-fatigue", "delayed ir-fatigue", and clinical outcomes in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in clinical practice.
517 patients were evaluated. After the 12-weeks landmark selection, 386 (74.7%) patients were eligible for the clinical outcomes analysis. 40.4% were NSCLC, 42.2% were melanoma, 15.3% renal cell carcinoma and 2.1% other malignancies. 76 patients (19.7%) experienced early ir-fatigue (within 1 month from treatment commencement), while 150 patients (38.9%) experienced delayed ir-fatigue. Early ir-fatigue was significantly related to shortened PFS (HR = 2.29 95% CI 1.62-3.22, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 2.32 95% CI 1.59-3.38, p < 0.0001) at the multivariate analysis. On the other hand, we found a significant association between the occurrence of early ir-fatigue, ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (p < 0.0001), and disease burden (p = 0.0003). Delayed ir-fatigue was not significantly related to PFS nor OS.
Early ir-fatigue seems to be negative prognostic parameter, but to proper weight its role we must to consider the predominant role of performance status, which was related to early ir-fatigue in the study population.
The optimal sequencing of targeted treatment and immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced melanoma is a key question and prospective studies to address this are ongoing. Previous observations ...suggest that treating first with targeted therapy may select for more aggressive disease, meaning that patients may not gain full benefit from subsequent immunotherapy. In a single-center retrospective analysis, we investigated whether response to pembrolizumab was affected by previous BRAF inhibitor therapy. A total of 42 patients with metastatic cutaneous or mucosal melanoma who had received previous treatment with ipilimumab were treated with pembrolizumab as part of the Italian expanded access program. Sixteen of these patients had BRAF-mutated melanoma and had also been previously treated with a BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib or dabrafenib), while 26 had BRAF wild-type melanoma (no previous BRAF inhibitor). Patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma who were previously treated with BRAF inhibitors had a significantly lower median progression-free survival (3 2.3-3.7 versus not reached 2-8+ mo; p = 0.001) and disease control rate (18.6% versus 65.4%; p = 0.005) than patients with BRAF wild-type, while there was also a trend toward a lower response rate (assessed using immune-related response criteria) although this was not significantly different between groups (12.5% versus 36.4%; p = 0.16). These data are consistent with previous reports that BRAF inhibitor therapy may affect subsequent response to immunotherapy.
The real-life application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may yield different outcomes compared to the benefit presented in clinical trials. For this reason, there is a need to define the ...group of patients that may benefit from treatment. We retrospectively investigated 578 metastatic melanoma patients treated with ICIs at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale” of Napoli, Italy (INT-NA). To compare patients’ clinical variables (i.e., age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil, BRAF status, previous treatment) and their predictive and prognostic power in a comprehensive, non-hierarchical manner, a clinical categorization algorithm (CLICAL) was defined and validated by the application of a machine learning algorithm—survival random forest (SRF-CLICAL). The comprehensive analysis of the clinical parameters by log risk-based algorithms resulted in predictive signatures that could identify groups of patients with great benefit or not, regardless of the ICI received. From a real-life retrospective analysis of metastatic melanoma patients, we generated and validated an algorithm based on machine learning that could assist with the clinical decision of whether or not to apply ICI therapy by defining five signatures of predictability with 95% accuracy.
Background: Geriatric patients (≥80 years) are underrepresented in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) clinical trials. However, their unique biology may affect their response to ICIs. There are ...currently no established biomarkers of the response to ICIs in adult patients with cancer that can help with patient selection. Methods: We built a multicenter, international retrospective study of 885 patients (<80 years: n = 417, 47.12%; ≥80 years: n = 468, 52.88%) with different tumor types treated with ICIs between 2011 and 2021 from 11 academic centers in the U.S. and Europe. The main outcome measures were objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) stratified by age and circulating inflammatory levels (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII)). Results: Patients ≥80 years with low NLR (NLR-L) and SII (SII-L) had significantly higher ORR (vs. high NLR NLR-H, p < 0.01 and SII-H, p < 0.05, respectively). At median follow-ups (13.03 months), and compared to SII-H, patients with SII-L had significantly longer median PFS and OS in patients <80 (p < 0.001), and ≥80 years (p < 0.001). SII-L was independently associated with longer PFS and OS (HR: 0.61 and 0.62, respectively, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Lower inflammation pre-ICI initiation may predict an improved response and survival in geriatric patients with cancer.
Cutaneous melanoma is a lethal disease, even when diagnosed in advanced stages. Although recent progress in biology and treatment has dramatically improved survival rates, new therapeutic approaches ...are still needed. Deregulation of epigenetics, which mainly controls DNA methylation status and chromatin remodeling, is implied not only in cancer initiation and progression, but also in resistance to antitumor drugs. Epigenetics in melanoma has been studied recently in both melanoma preclinical models and patient samples, highlighting its potential role in different phases of melanomagenesis, as well as in resistance to approved drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and MAPK inhibitors. This review summarizes what is currently known about epigenetics in melanoma and dwells on the recognized and potential new targets for testing epigenetic drugs, alone or together with other agents, in advanced melanoma patients.
Immunotherapy denotes an exemplar change in an oncological setting. Despite the effective application of these treatments across a broad range of tumors, only a minority of patients have beneficial ...effects. The efficacy of immunotherapy is affected by several factors, including human immunity, which is strongly correlated to genetic features, such as intra-tumor heterogeneity. Classic imaging assessment, based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is useful for conventional treatments, has a limited role in immunotherapy. The reason is due to different patterns of response and/or progression during this kind of treatment which differs from those seen during other treatments, such as the possibility to assess the wide spectrum of immunotherapy-correlated toxic effects (ir-AEs) as soon as possible. In addition, considering the unusual response patterns, the limits of conventional response criteria and the necessity of using related immune-response criteria are clear. Radiomics analysis is a recent field of great interest in a radiological setting and recently it has grown the idea that we could identify patients who will be fit for this treatment or who will develop ir-AEs.
BackgroundThe immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized cancer therapeutic landscape and substantially improved the survival of patients (pts) with advanced malignancies, especially in skin ...cancer pts.1–5 IL-6 is a key inflammatory molecule secreted by M2 macrophages after polarization, mediating the progression of pancreatic and colorectal cancer.6 7 The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate the relationships between IL-6 and outcome in skin cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.MethodsIL-6 levels were analyzed in two independent cohorts, in cohort 1 serum IL-6 were evaluated from 386 consecutive skin cancer pts before start ICIs. We included pts with unresectable/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) treated with cemiplimab (n=47); pts with resected stage III/IV melanoma (n=98) treated with anti-PD1; pts with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 (n=139), combo ipi+nivo (n=65) and ipilimumab alone (n=37). IL-6 was measured by Electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) from Cobas C6000 (Roche). In cohort 2 we conducted a gene profile analysis with Nanostring from PBMCs of 121 metastatic melanoma pts. All pts signed informed consent. Patient’s characteristics are listed in table 1. ROC curves were used to determine the best cut off. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard Ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a Cox regression model.ResultsAmong 507 pts, in cohort 1 lower serum IL-6 was associated with a better Progression Free Survival (PFS) 18.67 months (95% CI 16.6–20.7) versus 10.31 months (95% CI 8.5–12.0), HR = 0.45 (CI 0,3–0,5, p<0.0001); Overall Survival (OS) (27.59 months (95% CI 25.9–29.2) versus 20.12 months (95% CI 17.7–22.4), HR = 0.32 (CI 0,23–0,47, p<0.0001) and Overall Response Rate (ORR) (p<0.001). Similarly, IL-6 and previous therapy are associated with OS and PFS in multivariate analysis (p <0.01). We also confirmed the association between IL-6 and outcomes in all subgroups. In cohort 2 we observed a similar trend in pts with lower IL-6 expression. Moreover, higher IL-6 was associated to MAP3K12, EGFR, SELL,FPR1 genes.ConclusionsWe found that lower levels of both serum and gene expression of IL-6 are associated with better OS, PFS and ORR. Furthermore, IL-6 is associated to higher expression of genes relate to cell cycle, proliferation and metastasis. Further investigations are needed to get additional information.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente fundsReferencesJames Larkin, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Rene Gonzalez, Jean Jacques Grob, C Lance Cowey et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23–34.Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320–30.Weber JS, D’Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375–84.Schenker M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Marquez-Rodas I, Grob JJ, Butler MO, et al. CheckMate 238 Collaborators. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824–1835.Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23–34.He Z, Wang J, Zhu C, Xu J, Chen P, Jiang X, et al. Exosome-derived FGD5-AS1 promotes tumor-associated macrophage M2 polarization-mediated pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Cancer Lett 2022;548:215751. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215751.Li W, Wu Z, Meng W, Zhang C, Cheng M, Chen Y, et al. Blockade of IL-6 inhibits tumor immune evasion and improves anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Cytokine. 2022;158:155976. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2022.155976.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Cancer Institute—IRCCS—Fondazione ‘‘G. Pascale’’, Naples, Italy, protocol number 32/22 oss. All patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.Abstract 42 Table 1
BackgroundCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common skin cancer in white-skinned populations. Advanced or metastatic disease is rare, less than 5% of patients (pts), but when ...it occurs, is difficult to treat and often has a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint blockade with cemiplimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has been approved for advanced/metastatic CSCC1 were is getting excellent results.2 However, unlike what is already standard pratice for melanoma skin cancer,3 4 we do not know yet which is the optimal treatment duration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the minimum treatment period with cemiplimab in order to guarantee a durable clinical benefit.MethodsIn this retrospective study was evaluated the duration standard treatment with cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) in 95 pts with CSCC, on which 22 were discontinued not by clinical decision (figure 1). Demographic and clinical data were tabulated using descriptive statistics. PFS was calculated as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression or death, whichever occurs first; OS was calculated from randomization until death by any cause.ResultsOverall, 95 pts were enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics are reported in table 1. The median age was 75 years (range, 32–96 years), and 68 (72%) pts were males. Cemiplimab was administered as first-line therapy in 45 (47%) pts and as second-line in 50 (53%) subjects; The most frequent comorbidities were blood hypertension (51%) and angina/coronary artery disease (23%). At the first follow-up visit, 10 (11%) pts achieved CR, 25 (26%) PR, 35 (37%) reached SD, and 25 (35%) were in progression. Twenty-two stopped cemiplimab treatment due to comorbidity (n=7), toxicity (n=3), no compliant (n=9) and complete response (n=3). No significant difference was observed in this cohort compared to general population (figure 2) in terms of OS (p=0.47; HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.48)) and PFS (p=0.29; HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.32). In the swimmer plot cartoon (figure 3), we observed 10 death events in pts treated for less than a year (n=12), only 1 death in pts treated at least 1 year (n=10) and 0 death in pts treated at least 2 years (n=5) (figure 4).ConclusionsFrom a patients, healthcare, and economic perspective, shorter treatment duration is preferred, and overtreatment should be prevented. In these preliminary result we showed that at least one year of treatment with cemiplimab appears to be a valid option. Further investigations are needed to get additional information.ReferencesGoodman DT. Cemiplimab and Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Bench to Bedside. JPRAS Open. 2022 Jun 23;33:155−160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.06.003.Baggi A, Quaglino P, Rubatto M, Depenni R, Guida M, et al. Real world data of cemiplimab in locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:250−258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.018.Mulder EEAP, de Joode K, Litière S, Ten Tije AJ, Suijkerbuijk KPM, et al. Early discontinuation of PD-1 blockade upon achieving a complete or partial response in patients with advanced melanoma: the multicentre prospective Safe Stop trial. BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08018-w.Coen O, Corrie P, Marshall H, Plummer R, Ottensmeier C,et al. The DANTE trial protocol: a randomised phase III trial to evaluate the Duration of ANti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody Treatment in patients with metastatic mElanoma. BMC Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;21(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08509-w.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Cancer Institute—IRCCS—Fondazione ‘‘G. Pascale’’, Naples, Italy, protocol number 32/22 oss. All patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journalAbstract 579 Figure 1Abstract 579 Figure 2Abstract 579 Figure 3Abstract 579 Figure 4Abstract 579 Table 1
BackgroundNivolumab is an anti-PD-1 antibody approved for treating metastatic melanoma (MM), for which still limited evidence is available on the correlation between drug exposure and patient ...outcomes.MethodsIn this observational retrospective study, we assessed whether nivolumab concentration is associated with treatment response in 88 patients with MM and if the patient’s genetic profile plays a role in this association.ResultsWe observed a statistically significant correlation between nivolumab serum concentration and clinical outcomes, measured as overall and progression-free survival. Moreover, patients who achieved a clinical or partial response tended to have higher levels of nivolumab than those who reached stable disease or had disease progression. However, the difference was not statistically significant. In particular, patients who reached a clinical response had a significantly higher concentration of nivolumab and presented a distinct genetic signature, with more marked activation of ICOS and other genes involved in effector T-cells mediated proinflammatory pathways.ConclusionsIn conclusion, these preliminary results show that in patients with MM, nivolumab concentration correlates with clinical outcomes and is associated with an increased expression of ICOS and other genes involved in the activation of T effectors cells.
PDF
