Paralysis (paraplegia or quadriplegia) after posterior fossa surgery is a rare but devastating complication. We investigated previous reports of this complication to examine similarities among ...patients, risk factors, and methods by which it may be prevented.
A systematic review was completed according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched until November 2019 using keywords “paraplegia,” “quadriplegia,” or “spinal cord injury” added to “posterior fossa surgery.”
Thirteen case reports published between 1996 and 2019 were included. Five (38.5%) involved quadriplegia/quadriparesis and 8 (61.5%) involved paraplegia after surgery. Ten cases (76.9%) were tumor resections and 3 (23.1%) were posterior fossa decompressions (2 for Chiari malformations and 1 for Morquio syndrome). Seven surgeries (53.8%) were performed in the sitting position and 6 (46.2%) were prone. Proposed mechanisms of paralysis involved cervical hyperflexion yielding spinal cord ischemia in 8 patients (61.5%), arterial hypotension in 2 patients (15.4%), spinal cord compression from hematoma in 1 patient (7.7%), and decreased cardiac output in 1 patient (7.7%) (1 study did not propose a cause). Cervical hyperflexion was equally likely in the sitting and prone positions (4 patients each). Only 3 patients (23.1%) involved intraoperative complications (all cardiopulmonary in nature).
Paralysis after posterior fossa surgery often involves spinal cord infarction apparently caused by cervical hyperflexion. Extreme care during patient positioning is needed in both the sitting or prone positions. Electrophysiologic monitoring might enable early identification of spinal cord dysfunction to minimize or avoid this complication.
Background
Given surgery’s inherent risks, a patient should be able to make the most informed decisions possible in selecting surgical treatment. However, there is little information on what factors ...patients deem important when choosing a surgeon. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on how patients select surgical care, focusing on identification of factors that influence patient choice as well as important sources of information used by patients.
Methods
A search of all available literature on factors associated with choice of surgeon/surgical care, as well as sources of information used by patients before undergoing surgery, was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed electronic database.
Results
Of the 2315 publications identified, 86 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, patients draw upon a wide range of factors when choosing surgical care. Surgeon reputation and competency stood out as the most valued professional attributes. Patients also often selected surgeons based on their interpersonal skills. Many patients chose surgical care using hospital, rather than surgeon, characteristics. For these patients, hospital reputation and hospital distance were factors of primary importance. Importantly, most patients relied on word-of-mouth and physician referrals when choosing a surgeon. Patients also expressed interest in quality information on surgeons, indicating that these data would be useful in decision-making.
Conclusions
Patients draw upon a myriad of factors when choosing a surgeon and the circumstances surrounding patients’ decisions maybe differ based on sociodemographic, cultural, as well as other factors. Additional information on how patients choose surgeons or hospitals will help providers assist patients in finding their preferred caregivers.
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a surgical technique to restore lumbar lordosis in patients with rigid sagittal deformity. Herein, we report on outcomes of a surgical technique utilizing a ...4-rod PSO with satellite rods.
A retrospective study was performed for a cohort of patients who underwent 4-rod PSO revision surgery for sagittal deformity. Procedures were performed by one surgeon at 2 different academic centers between 2004-2018. Alignment outcomes and complications specifically for revision surgeries in previously fused spines were assessed.
40 patients underwent PSO with the satellite rod technique (n = 29 at L3, 72.5%; n = 7 at L4, 17.5%). Mean PSO angle was 28.7 ± 7.6°. Two patients (5%) had rod fracture necessitating revision surgery at 32 and 34 months. Three patients (7.5%) developed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), but none required revision. No patients developed pseudoarthrosis. Mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was 13.5 ± 7.3 cm, which decreased to 4.8 ± 7.3 cm (P = 0.002) postoperatively. Mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch improved from 35.9 ± 16.6° preoperatively to 11.8 ± 14.6° postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) improved from 34.7 ± 9.8° preoperatively to 30.1 ± 9.0° (P = 0.026) postoperatively. Mean global alignment and proportion (GAP) score improved from 10 ± 2 preoperatively to 8 ± 2 postoperatively (P < 0.001), which was still considered severely disproportioned.
Rod failure rate after PSO with the 4-rod satellite configuration was low. SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and PT significantly improved for these previously-fused patients. Mean GAP score also improved, but was still considered severely disproportioned, likely due to the inability of PSO to correct low LL or PT in previously-fused spines.
: Advances in virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) technologies have resulted in their increased application across many medical specialties. VR's main application has ...been for teaching and preparatory roles, while AR has been mostly used as a surgical adjunct. The objective of this study is to discuss the various applications and prospects for VR, AR, and MR specifically as they relate to spine surgery.
: A systematic review was conducted to examine the current applications of VR, AR, and MR with a focus on spine surgery. A literature search of two electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The study quality was assessed using the MERSQI score for educational research studies, QUACS for cadaveric studies, and the JBI critical appraisal tools for clinical studies.
: A total of 228 articles were identified in the primary literature review. Following title/abstract screening and full-text review, 46 articles were included in the review. These articles comprised nine studies performed in artificial models, nine cadaveric studies, four clinical case studies, nineteen clinical case series, one clinical case-control study, and four clinical parallel control studies. Teaching applications utilizing holographic overlays are the most intensively studied aspect of AR/VR; the most simulated surgical procedure is pedicle screw placement.
: VR provides a reproducible and robust medium for surgical training through surgical simulations and for patient education through various platforms. Existing AR/MR platforms enhance the accuracy and precision of spine surgeries and show promise as a surgical adjunct.
PDF
