Much has been written about Elispot and how to optimally run the assay for a wide variety of applications. But only a limited number of articles exist addressing the analysis step, the plate ...evaluation. Comparing that fact with the vast amount of analysis advise available for other single cell immune assay, for example, intracellular cytokine staining, the overall impression may be that Elispot evaluation is just simple enough to not require extensive elaboration and guidance. At first thought this appears reasonable because how difficult can it be counting colored spots on a white background. In addition, automated Elispot readers were already introduced more than 20 years ago (Herr et al., J Immunol Methods 203, 141-152, 1997), easing the strenuous load of manual counting and providing means to decrease the subjectivity in Elispot analysis. Just shortly thereafter however, the first report was published about the subjectivity and operator-dependency of plate evaluation even when using automated reader systems (Janetzki et al., J Immunol Methods 291, 175-183, 2004). Later, the plate evaluation was identified as a main factor causing variability in Elispot results, triggering the inclusion of recommendations on handling of artifacts and the audits of plate reading results in the Initial Elispot Harmonization guidelines (Janetzki et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother 57, 303-315, 2008; Britten et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother 57, 289-302, 2008). In follow-up, a large international study with 75 laboratories was conducted to address the current approaches taken to evaluate Elispot plates and to establish consensus guidelines for plate evaluation (Janetzki et al., Nat Protoc 10, 1098-1115, 2015). This article addresses the special challenges of plate evaluation, gives explanations for unusual observation, and provides overall recommendations on how to work through the labyrinth of available algorithms and reader settings to obtain reliable Elispot data.
The ELISpot assay has a solid place in the immune monitoring field for over 40 years. It is an assay that can assess the function of single immune cells in a straightforward and easy-to-learn ...approach. Its use in basic research, translational, and clinical work has been documented in countless publications. Harmonization guidelines and invaluable tools for optimal assay performance and evaluation exist. However, the validation of an established ELISpot protocol has been left to diverse opinions about how to interpret and tackle typical validation parameters. This chapter addresses important considerations for ELISpot validation, including the interpretations of validation parameters for a meaningful description of assay performance.
The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis recurrence can be challenging due to persistently positive detection of
-specific DNA from sputum and bronchopulmonary samples in the absence of active disease.
We ...compared the diagnostic accuracy of the detection of
-specific DNA by either Xpert (January 2010-June 2018) or Xpert Ultra (July 2018-June 2020) and
-specific ELISPOT in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples with
culture results from sputum or bronchopulmonary samples in patients with suspected recurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Among 44 individuals with previous tuberculosis and a presumptive diagnosis of recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis, 4/44 (9.1%) were diagnosed with recurrent tuberculosis by culture. DNA of
was detected by Xpert in BAL fluid in 1/4 (25%) individuals with recurrent tuberculosis and in 2/40 (5%) cases with past tuberculosis without recurrence, while BAL-ELISPOT with a cut-off of >4,000 early secretory antigenic target-6-specific or culture filtrate protein-10-specific interferon-γ-producing lymphocytes per 1 million BAL-lymphocytes was positive in 4/4 (100%) individuals with recurrent tuberculosis and in 2/40 (5%) cases of past tuberculosis without recurrence.
-specific BAL-ELISPOT is more accurate than BAL-Xpert for the diagnosis of paucibacillary tuberculosis recurrence.
Background:
Immune responses following vaccination against COVID-19 with different vaccines and the waning of immunity vary within the population. Genetic host factors are likely to contribute to ...this variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study on G protein polymorphisms and vaccination responses against COVID-19 has been published so far.
Methods:
Antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and T-cell responses against a peptide pool of SARS-CoV-2 S1 proteins were measured 1 and 6 months after the second vaccination with mRNA-1273 in the main study group of 204 participants. Additionally, antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured in a group of 597 participants 1 month after the second vaccination with mRNA-1273. Genotypes of
GNB3
c.825C>T were determined in all participants.
Results:
The median antibody titer against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and median values of spots increment in the SARS-CoV-2 IFN-γ ELISpot assay against the S1-peptide pool were significantly decreased from months 1 to 6 (
p
< 0.0001). Genotypes of
GNB3
c.825C>T had no influence on the humoral immune response. At month 1, CC genotype carriers had significantly increased T-cell responses compared to CT (
p
= 0.005) or TT (
p
= 0.02) genotypes. CC genotype carriers had an almost 6-fold increased probability compared to TT genotype carriers and an almost 3-fold increased probability compared to T-allele carriers to mount a SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response above the median value.
Conclusion:
CC genotype carriers of the
GNB3
c.825C>T polymorphism have an increased T-cell immune response to SARS-CoV-2, which may indicate better T-cell-mediated protection against COVID-19 after vaccination with mRNA-1273.
SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response characterization represents a crucial issue for defining the role of immune protection against COVID-19. The aim of the study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response ...in a cohort of COVID-19 convalescent patients and in a group of unexposed subjects.
SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was quantified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 87 COVID-19 convalescent subjects (range 7–239 days after symptom onset) and 33 unexposed donors by ex vivo ELISpot assay. Follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was performed in ten subjects up to 12 months after symptom onset. The role of SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4 and CD8 T cells was characterized in a group of COVID-19 convalescent subjects. Moreover, neutralizing antibodies were determined in serum samples.
In 14/33 (42.4%) unexposed donors and 85/87 (97.7%) COVID-19 convalescent subjects a positive result for at least one SARS-CoV-2 antigen was observed. A positive response was observed up to 12 months after COVID-19 infection (median 246 days after symptom onset; range 118–362 days). Of note, SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response seems to be mainly mediated by CD4 T cells. A weak positive correlation was observed between Spike-specific T-cell response and neutralizing antibody titre (p 0.0028; r2 = 0.2891) and positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was observed in 8/9 (88.9%) COVID-19 convalescent subjects with undetectable SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies.
Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response in uninfected patients may be due to previous infections with other common coronaviruses. Our data suggest that long-term SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response might accompany a waning humoral response.
Information on the clinical characteristics and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying post-COVID-19 fatigue are scarce. The main objective of this study was to evaluate sex-specific humoral and ...T-cell responses associated with post-COVID-19 fatigue in a sample of individuals treated as outpatients.
At a median time of 279 (179;325) days after the acute infection, a total of 281 individuals (45.9% men) aged 18-87 years old were included in the analysis. The participants were examined at the University Hospital of Augsburg, Southern Germany. Fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Levels of anti-SARS-CoV2-spike IgG antibodies were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and for exploration of the SARS-CoV2-specific T-cell response, ex vivo ELISpot/FLUOROspot assays were conducted using an interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) SARS-CoV-iSpot kit.
Women more significantly suffered from post-COVID-19 fatigue in comparison to men (47.4% versus 25.6%, p=0.0002). Females but not males with fatigue showed a significantly lower number of T-cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2 or both IL-2 and IFNγ in comparison with females without fatigue. In both sexes, serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV2-spike IgG antibodies did not differ significantly between participants with or without fatigue.
Development of fatigue after acute COVID-19 disease might be associated with SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses in women, but not men after a mild infection course treated outpatient.
Little is known about the frequency, phenotype and function of HBV-specific B cells during chronic infection. Here we study HBcAg and HBsAg-specific B cells in different clinical phases of a chronic ...HBV infection.
We included 118 treatment naïve and 34 nucleos(t)ide analogue-treated patients with chronic HBV and 23 healthy HBsAg-vaccinated controls. Global and HBV-specific B lymphocytes were examined by FACS using fluorescently labeled HBsAg and HBcAg as baits. Functional HBV-specific B cell responses were quantified in B cell ELISPOT assays. Anti-HBs and anti-HBc antibodies were measured in serum and in ELISPOT supernatant by ELISA.
Higher HBcAg-directed B cell responses were found in HBV clinical phases with elevated vs. low serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, irrespective of the HBeAg-status. In contrast, HBsAg-directed responses were lower and did not significantly fluctuate. In individual patients a mean 17.8-fold more circulating B cells target HBcAg than HBsAg baits. These HBcAg-specific B cells present a classical memory B cell profile and have slightly higher CD69 expression levels compared to global memory B cells. Viral suppression and ALT normalization upon treatment led to a numeric and functional reduction of HBcAg-specific B cell responses, accompanied by progressive decreases in serum anti-HBc antibodies.
HBcAg-specific memory B cells present a classical memory B cell phenotype, vary in number and function throughout HBV's natural history and are significantly reduced during antiviral treatment.
In recent years, studies examining the role of B cells during chronic hepatitis B virus infection have regained interest. We show that circulating B cells more often target the hepatitis B core antigen than the hepatitis surface antigen. Moreover, these hepatitis B core-specific B cells associate with the natural history of chronic HBV, and their responses decline during effective antiviral treatment.
Display omitted
•B cell responses in chronic HBV are predominantly directed against HBcAg, not HBsAg.•HBcAg-specific memory B cells associate with HBV's clinical phases.•HBcAg-specific B cell responses are reduced during antiviral treatment.
PDF
