Total joint arthroplasty as a surgical treatment option for trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis is recently revived. The aim of this study is to report on mid- and long-term results of the Elektra ...(single-mobility) and Moovis (dual-mobility) prosthesis for treatment of primary thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis.
In this retrospective, monocentric, descriptive cohort study, 31 prostheses were evaluated that were implanted by a single surgeon in 26 patients between 2009 and 2019. Indication for surgery was trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (Eaton/Littler Stage II and III). Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a minimum of 24 months. The postoperative assessment included range of motion, pain, strength as well as functional scores (DASH, MHQ). Implant survival and complications were the primary endpoints.
10 Elektra and 21 Moovis prostheses were implanted between 2009 and 2019 with a mean follow-up of 74.2 months in the Elektra and 41.4 months in the Moovis group. The average patients' age at surgery was 64 years. Postoperative pain levels (VAS 0-10) were below 2 at rest and under stress in both groups. Grip/pinch strength and range of motion showed results comparable to the contralateral hand. Opposition was excellent with an average Kapandji index of 9.6 in both groups. Elektra achieved slightly better functional scores in the DASH and MHQ score. Satisfaction was high in both groups, and 96% of the patients would recommend the procedure. Metacarpophalangeal hyperextension > 15° was seen in 3 patients per group preoperatively and was corrected to < 5° post-surgery. 3 Elektra prostheses were revised due to cup loosening and dislocation for cup and/or neck replacement or secondary trapeziectomy. 1 Moovis prosthesis was revised with an exchange of the neck to a larger size due to restricted movement. After the mean follow-up of 7.9 years in Elektra and 3.5 years in MOOVIS, cumulative survival was 68.6% vs. 95.2%, respectively.
In this mid- to long-term retrospective analysis, total joint arthroplasty in primary trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis results in low pain levels, excellent mobility and clinical function. Patient satisfaction is overall high. While revision due to cup loosening occurred more often in patients with single-mobility implants, no cases of dislocation or loosening of components were observed in the dual-mobility group.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, reference number S-150/2020.
These guidelines are intended for use by infectious disease specialists, orthopedists, and other healthcare professionals who care for patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). They include ...evidence-based and opinion-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with PJI treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis, resection arthroplasty with or without subsequent staged reimplantation, 1-stage reimplantation, and amputation.
Abstract As a new generation of medical metallic material, magnesium (Mg) and its alloys with or without surface coating have attracted a great deal of attention due to its biodegradability and ...potential for avoiding a removal operation after the implant has fulfilled its function for surgical fixation of injured musculoskeletal tissues. Although a few clinical cases on Mg-based orthopaedic implants were reported more than a century ago, it was not until recently that clinical trials using these implants with improved physicochemical properties were carried out in Germany, China and Korea for bone fracture fixation. The promising results so far suggest a bright future for biodegradable Mg-based orthopaedic implants and would warrant large scale phase II/III studies. Given the increasing interest on this emerging biomaterials and intense effort to improve its properties for various clinical applications, this review covers the evolution, current strategies, and future perspectives in the development of Mg-based orthopaedic implants. We also highlight a few clinical cases performed in China that may be unfamiliar to the general orthopaedic community.
A panel of experts (the 2014 Panel) convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs developed an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) on the use of prophylactic ...antibiotics in patients with prosthetic joints who are undergoing dental procedures. This CPG is intended to clarify the "Prevention of Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Patients Undergoing Dental Procedures: Evidence-based Guideline and Evidence Report," which was developed and published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Dental Association (the 2012 Panel).
The 2014 Panel based the current CPG on literature search results and direct evidence contained in the comprehensive systematic review published by the 2012 Panel, as well as the results from an updated literature search. The 2014 Panel identified 4 case-control studies.
The 2014 Panel judged that the current best evidence failed to demonstrate an association between dental procedures and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The 2014 Panel also presented information about antibiotic resistance, adverse drug reactions, and costs associated with prescribing antibiotics for PJI prophylaxis.
The 2014 Panel made the following clinical recommendation: In general, for patients with prosthetic joint implants, prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended prior to dental procedures to prevent prosthetic joint infection. The practitioner and patient should consider possible clinical circumstances that may suggest the presence of a significant medical risk in providing dental care without antibiotic prophylaxis, as well as the known risks of frequent or widespread antibiotic use. As part of the evidence-based approach to care, this clinical recommendation should be integrated with the practitioner's professional judgment and the patient's needs and preferences.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty is a leading cause of revision surgery, inferior function, complications, and death. The administration of topical, intrawound ...vancomycin (vancomycin powder) has appeared promising in some studies, but others have found it ineffective in reducing infection risk; for that reason, a high-quality systematic review of the best-available evidence is needed.
In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Does topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) reduce PJI risk in hip and knee arthroplasty? (2) Does topical vancomycin lead to an increased risk of complications after hip and knee arthroplasty?
A search of Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases as of June 2020 was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing topical vancomycin in addition to standard infection prevention regimens (such as routine perioperative intravenous antibiotics) with standard regimens only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients 18 years or older with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. No restrictions on maximal loss to follow-up or PJI definition were imposed. Studies were excluded if they included patients with a history of septic arthritis, used an antibiotic other than vancomycin or a different route of administration for the intervention, performed additional interventions that differed between groups, or omitted a control group. A total of 2408 studies were screened, resulting in nine eligible studies reviewing 3371 patients who received topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) during a primary THA or TKA and 2884 patients who did not receive it. Groups were comparable with respect to duration of follow-up and loss to follow-up when reported. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, showing moderate-to-high quality for the included studies. The risks of PJI and overall complications in the topical vancomycin group were compared with those in the control group.
One of nine studies found a lower risk of PJI after primary THA or TKA, while eight did not, with odds ratios that broadly bracketed the line of no difference (range of odds ratios across the nine studies 0.09 to 1.97). In the six studies where overall complications could be compared between topical vancomycin and control groups in primary THA or TKA, there was no difference in overall complication risks with vancomycin (range of ORs across the six studies 0.48 to 0.94); however, we caution that these studies were underpowered to detect differences in the types of uncommon complications associated with vancomycin use (such as allergy, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity).
In the absence of clear evidence of efficacy, and without a sufficiently large evidence base reporting on safety-related endpoints, topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) should not be used in routine primary THA and TKA. Adequately powered, multicenter, prospective trials demonstrating clear reductions in infection risk and large registry-driven audits of safety-related endpoints are required before the widespread use of topical vancomycin can be recommended.
Level III, therapeutic study.
Our objective was to identify combination tests used to diagnose chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and develop a stepwise decision-making tool to facilitate diagnosis.
We conducted a ...systematic review of existing combinations of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for diagnosing chronic PJI after hip or knee replacement. This work is an extension of our systematic review of single tests, from which we chose eligible studies that also described the diagnostic performance of combination tests.
Thirty-seven eligible articles described the performance of 56 combination tests, of which 8 combinations had at least 2 studies informing both sensitivity and specificity. We also identified 5 types of combination tests: (1) a type-I Boolean combination, which uses Boolean logic (AND, OR) and usually increases specificity at the cost of sensitivity; (2) a type-II Boolean combination, which usually increases sensitivity at the cost of specificity; (3) a triage-conditional rule, in which the value of 1 test serves to triage the use of another test; (4) an arithmetic operation on the values of 2 tests; and (5) a model-based prediction rule based on a fitted model applied to biomarker values.
Clinicians can initiate their diagnostic process with a type-II Boolean combination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). False negatives of the combination can be minimized when the threshold is chosen to reach 90% to 95% sensitivity for each test. Once a joint infection is suspected on the basis of serum testing, joint aspiration should be performed. If joint aspiration yields a wet tap, a leukocyte esterase (LER) strip is highly recommended for point-of-care testing, with a reading of ++ or greater indicating PJI; a reading below ++ should be followed by one of the laboratory-based synovial tests. If joint aspiration yields a dry tap, clinicians should rely on preoperative tissue culture and histological analysis for diagnosis. Combinations based on triage-conditional, arithmetic, and model-based prediction rules require further research.
Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Currently, the implants utilized in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are divided between mobile-bearing 3-component and fixed-bearing 2-component designs. The literature evaluating the influence of ...this mobility difference on implant survival is sparse. The purpose of the present study was therefore to compare the short-term survival of 2 implants of similar design from the same manufacturer, surgically implanted by the same surgeons, in fixed-bearing or mobile-bearing versions.
All patients were enrolled who underwent TAA with either the mobile-bearing Salto (Tornier and Integra) or the fixed-bearing Salto Talaris (Integra) in 3 centers by 2 surgeons between January 2004 and March 2018. All patients who underwent TAA from January 2004 to April 2013 received the Salto implant, and all patients who underwent TAA after November 2012 received the Salto Talaris implant. The primary outcome was time, within 3 years, to first all-cause reoperation, revision of any metal component, and revision of any component, including the polyethylene insert. Secondary outcomes included the frequency, cause, and type of reoperation.
A total of 302 consecutive patients were included, of whom 171 received the mobile-bearing and 131 received the fixed-bearing implant. The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause reoperation was 1.42 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.67 to 3.00; p = 0.36); for component revision, 3.31 (95% CI, 0.93 to 11.79; p = 0.06); and for metal component revision, 2.78 (95% CI, 0.58 to 13.33; p = 0.20). A total of 31 reoperations were performed in the mobile-bearing group compared with 14 in the fixed-bearing group (p = 0.07). More extensive reoperation procedures were performed in the mobile-bearing group.
With the largest comparison of 2 implants of similar design from the same manufacturer, the present study supports the use of a fixed-bearing design in terms of short-term failure. We found a 3-times higher rate of revision among mobile-bearing implants compared with fixed-bearing implants at 3 years after TAA. Reoperations, including first and subsequent procedures, tended to be less common and the causes and types of reoperations less extensive among fixed-bearing implants.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Abstract The two leading causes of failure for joint arthroplasty prostheses are aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection. With the number of primary and revision joint replacement ...surgeries on the rise, strategies to mitigate these failure modes have become increasingly important. Much of the recent work in this field has focused on the design of coatings either to prevent infection while ignoring bone mineralization or vice versa, to promote osseointegration while ignoring microbial susceptibility. However, both coating functions are required to achieve long-term success of the implant; therefore, these two modalities must be evaluated in parallel during the development of new orthopaedic coating strategies. In this review, we discuss recent progress and future directions for the design of multifunctional orthopaedic coatings that can inhibit microbial cells while still promoting osseointegration.
Cutibacterium acnes is a commensal skin bacterium, regularly implicated in prosthetic joint infection, particularly of the shoulder. Diagnosis has been improved by progress in bacteriological ...techniques: longer culture time, liquid medium culture, MALDI-TOF mass spectrography, and universal 16S rRNA PCR, associated by some authors to sonication of ablated implants. C. acnes pathogenicity involves many virulence factors, notably including biofilm formation. C. acnes may lead to infection that is clinically evident or, frequently, relatively asymptomatic. C. acnes is an anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium, susceptible to many antibiotics that are regularly used in bone and joint infection: beta-lactams, quinolone, rifampicin and clindamycin. It shows increasing resistance to clindamycin and natural resistance to metronidazole. Treatment is medical and surgical, associating synovectomy or complete 1- or 2-step revision depending on time to treatment, and antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic therapy is typically for three months with an initial 2–6 weeks’ intravenous phase. Prognosis is generally favorable with well-conducted treatment. Late discovery of positive samples after apparently aseptic implant change is an at-risk situation, usually managed by antibiotic therapy, but with late initiation and hence increased risk of failure. Adverse secondary progression requires repeat revision under good conditions.
PDF
