UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Tay, Joshua K; Cross, Gail B; Toh, Song Tar; Lee, Chun Kiat; Loh, Jerold; Lim, Zhen Yu; Ngiam, Nicholas; Chee, Jeremy; Gan, Soo Wah; Saraf, Anmol; Chow, Wai Tung Eason; Goh, Han Lee; Siow, Chor Hiang; Lian, Derrick W Q; Loh, Woei Shyang; Loh, Kwok Seng; Lim, Chwee Ming; Chua, Ying Ying; Tan, Thuan Tong; Tan, Hiang Khoon; Yan, Benedict; Ko, Karrie; Chan, Kian Sing; Oon, Lynette; Chow, Vincent T K; Wang, De Yun; Fuh, Jerry Y H; Yen, Ching-Chiuan; Wong, John E L; Allen, David M

    JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 05/2021, Volume: 147, Issue: 5
    Journal Article

    Three-dimensionally printed nasopharyngeal swabs (3DP swabs) have been used to mitigate swab shortages during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Clinical validation for diagnostic accuracy and consistency, as well as patient acceptability, is crucial to evaluate the swab's performance. To determine the accuracy and acceptability of the 3DP swab for identifying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A diagnostic study was conducted from May to July 2020 at 2 tertiary care centers in Singapore with different reference swabs (FLOQSwab COPAN Diagnostics or Dacron swab Deltalab) and swab processing techniques (wet or dry) to evaluate the performance of the 3DP swab compared with traditional, standard-of-care nasopharyngeal swabs used in health care institutions. The participants were patients with COVID-19 in the first 2 weeks of illness and controls with acute respiratory illness with negative test results for SARS-CoV-2. Paired nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from the same nostril and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. The sequence of swabs was randomized based on odd and even participant numbers. Primary outcome measures were overall agreement (OA), positive percentage agreement (PPA), and negative percentage agreement of the 3DP swab compared with reference swabs. Secondary outcome measures were the correlation of cycle threshold (Ct) values of both swabs. The mean (SD) age of participants was 45.4 (13.1) years, and most participants were men (87 of 89 97.8%), in keeping with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. A total of 79 patients with COVID-19 and 10 controls were recruited. Among the patients with COVID-19, the overall agreement and PPA of the 3DP swab was 91.1% and 93.5%, respectively, compared with reference swabs. The PPA was 100% for patients with COVID-19 who were tested within the first week of illness. All controls tested negative. The reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction Ct values for the ORF1ab and E-gene targets showed a strong correlation (intraclass correlations coefficient, 0.869-0.920) between the 3DP and reference swab on independent testing at each institution despite differences in sample processing. Discordant results for both gene targets were observed only at high Ct values. In this diagnostic study of 79 patients with COVID-19 and 10 controls, the 3DP swab performed accurately and consistently across health care institutions and could help mitigate strained resources in the escalating COVID-19 pandemic.