UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed
  • International expert consen...
    Nagakawa, Yuichi; Nakata, Kohei; Nishino, Hitoe; Ohtsuka, Takao; Ban, Daisuke; Asbun, Horacio J.; Boggi, Ugo; He, Jin; Kendrick, Michael L.; Palanivelu, Chinnusamy; Liu, Rong; Wang, Shin‐E; Tang, Chung‐Ngai; Takaori, Kyoichi; Abu Hilal, Mohammed; Goh, Brian K. P.; Honda, Goro; Jang, Jin‐Young; Kang, Chang Moo; Kooby, David A.; Nakamura, Yoshiharu; Shrikhande, Shailesh V.; Wolfgang, Christopher L.; Yiengpruksawan, Anusak; Yoon, Yoo‐Seok; Watanabe, Yusuke; Kozono, Shingo; Ciria, Ruben; Berardi, Giammauro; Garbarino, Giovanni Maria; Higuchi, Ryota; Ikenaga, Naoki; Ishikawa, Yoshiya; Maekawa, Aya; Murase, Yoshiki; Zimmitti, Giuseppe; Kunzler, Filipe; Wang, Zi‐Zheng; Sakuma, Leon; Takishita, Chie; Osakabe, Hiroaki; Endo, Itaru; Tanaka, Masao; Yamaue, Hiroki; Tanabe, Minoru; Wakabayashi, Go; Tsuchida, Akihiko; Nakamura, Masafumi

    Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, January 2022, Volume: 29, Issue: 1
    Journal Article

    Background The anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD. Methods Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting. Results Three clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection. Conclusions MIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD. Highlight Nagakawa and colleagues created consensus guidance regarding the anatomical approaches for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), based on literature reviews and expert opinions, and summarized the anatomical landmarks around the superior mesenteric artery that need to be identified during surgery. This expert consensus will contribute to the safe implementation of MIPD.