E-resources
Peer reviewed
-
Wei, Jianming
Powder technology, 12/2014, Volume: 268Journal Article
Inverse and acceptance–rejection strategy are two widely used schemes by various Monte Carlo (MC) methods for handling particle coagulations. They exhibit different algorithm complexity and computational efficiency. In an effort to have a better understanding of the two schemes, we systematically compare their computational performance on CPU and GPUs (graphic processing units) with different computing conditions. The obtained results may serve as a useful guidance on the choice of the particular scheme by various MC methods for handling problems of particle dynamics in practice. Display omitted •The computational performances of MCs using Inverse and AR scheme are compared.•AR scheme has an obvious edge over Inverse scheme both on CPU and GPU.•In particular, AR performs much better than its counterpart for multi-cells cases.•Practically, AR is a better choice for MCs in solving particle dynamic problems.
Author
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.