Moral Intuitions, Cognitive Psychology, and the Harming-Versus-Not-Aiding Distinction

E-resources

Peer reviewed

Moral Intuitions, Cognitive Psychology, and the Harming-Versus-Not-Aiding Distinction

Kamm, F. M.

Ethics, 04/1998, Volume: 108, Issue: 3

Journal Article

Kamm examines whether the methods and results of cognitive psychology are relevant to the questions philosophers ask about the form and validity of a moral theory and the methods used in doing moral philosophy. The methods and claims put forth by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky are considered, with a focus on their development of prospect theory.

Keep searching

Author

Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.

Year	Impact factor		Edition		Category		Classification
Year	JCR	SNIP	JCR	SNIP	JCR	SNIP	JCR	SNIP

Links to authors' personal bibliographies	Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system

Source: Personal bibliographies and: SICRIS

Upload image

Shelf entry

Adding material to shelf was successful.

Adding material to shelf failed.

It was not necessary to add the material to the shelf.

Permalink

E-mail

Impact factor

Select the library membership card:

DRS, in which the journal is indexed

Citations

Theme