Hrvatskim zakonodavstvom na područjima prava na pristup informacijama, zaštite osobnih podataka, zaštite tajnih podataka, arhiva i medijskog prava uređeni su različiti oblici testova uravnoteživanja interesa. Testovi su povezani s: relativnim ograničenjem prava na pristup informacijama; zakonitosti obrade osobnih podataka i pravom na zaborav; iznimnom mogućnosti pristupa klasificiranim podatcima; pojedinim elementima pristupa javnom arhivskom gradivu te zaštitom privatnosti u medijima. U radu su teorijski i normativno analizirana i međusobno uspoređena bitna obilježja navedenih testova, njihove svrhe, odnosi između njih te pravni postupci u kojima se primjenjuju. Razmotreno je i ishodište testova u načelu razmjernosti, zakonodavni pristupi uređenju testova, ustavnopravni kontekst pojedinih testova te njihov odnos s upravnom diskrecijom. Navedeni testovi uređuju se zakonom ili propisom nadzakonske snage. Primjenjuju se individualizirano, u skladu s okolnostima konkretnoga slučaja. Svrha im je uravnotežiti vrijednosti i interese koji se štite nedostupnošću informacije s javnim interesom njihove dostupnosti. Normativno se uređuju kao samostojeći testovi ili kao testovi komplementarni samostojećim testovima. Uz rijetke iznimke, primjenjuju se u upravnom postupku, uz sudsku zaštitu u upravnome sporu. Croatian legislation in the areas of the right to access to information, protection of personal data, protection of secret data, archives, and media law regulates various forms of interest balancing tests. The tests are related to: relative restrictions on the right to access information; the legality of personal data processing and the right to be forgotten; exceptional access to classified data; certain elements of access to public archival materials; protection of privacy in the media. In the paper, the important characteristics of the mentioned tests, their purposes, the relationships between respective tests, and the legal procedures in which the tests are applied are theoretically and normatively analyzed and compared with each other. The origin of tests in the principle of proportionality, legislative approaches to regulating tests, the constitutional context of specific tests, and their relationship with administrative discretion are also considered. The mentioned tests are regulated by law or by regulation of supra-legal force. They are applied individually, in accordance with the circumstances of a specific case. Their purpose is to balance the values and interests protected by the unavailability of information with the public interest in its availability. Legislatively, they are regulated as stand-alone tests or as tests complementary to stand-alone tests. With rare exceptions, they apply in administrative procedure, with judicial protection in administrative disputes.