UNI-MB - logo
UMNIK - logo
 
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed
  • Comparison of co–gasificati...
    Seçer, Açelya; Küçet, Nilgün; Fakı, Ender; Hasanoğlu, Arif

    International journal of hydrogen energy, 11/2018, Volume: 43, Issue: 46
    Journal Article

    The diversity in the chemical composition of lignocellulosic feedstocks can affect the conversion technologies employed for hydrogen production. Gasification and co–gasification activities of lignocellulosic biomass, biomass hydrolysate, and coal were evaluated for hydrogen rich gas production. The hydrolysates of biomass materials showed the best performance for gasification. The results indicated that biomass hydrolysates obtained from lignocellulosic biomass were more sensitive to degradation and therefore, produced more hydrogen and gaseous products than that of lignocellulosic biomass. The effects of feed (kenaf and sorghum hydrolysate), flow rate (0.3–2.0 mL/min) and temperature (700–900 °C) on hydrogen production and gasification yields were investigated. It was observed that 0.5 mL/min the optimum feed flow rate for the maximum total gas and hydrogen production. Synergism effects were observed for co–gasification of coal/biomass and coal/biomass hydrolysate. In all co–gasification processes, the main component of the gas mixture was hydrogen (≥70%). •Hydrolysis of biomass is an efficient pretreatment for co-gasification with coal.•Biomass hydrolysates show better performance than raw biomasses in co-gasification.•Synergistic effects of co-gasification of coal/biomass hydrolysates were evaluated.•The main gas formed all co-gasification process was hydrogen (≥70%).•Co-gasification process is affected by feed flow rate of hydrolysate and temperature.