Objectives
Little is known about the external validity of the Data‐collection on Adverse Effects of Anti‐HIV Drugs (D:A:D) model for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among people living ...with HIV (PLWH). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the updated D:A:D model for 5‐year CVD risk in a diverse group of PLWH engaged in HIV care.
Methods
We used data from an institutional HIV registry, which includes PLWH engaged in care at a safety‐net HIV clinic. Eligible individuals had a baseline clinical encounter between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014, with follow‐up through to 31 December 2019. We estimated 5‐year predicted risks of CVD as a function of the prognostic index and baseline survival of the D:A:D model, which were used to assess model discrimination (C‐index), calibration and net benefit.
Results
Our evaluable population comprised 1029 PLWH, of whom 30% were female, 50% were non‐Hispanic black, and median age was 45 years. The C‐index was 0.70 95% confidence limits (CL): 0.64–0.75. The predicted 5‐year CVD risk was 3.0% and the observed 5‐year risk was 8.9% (expected/observed ratio = 0.33, 95% CL: 0.26–0.54). The model had a greater net benefit than treating all or treating none at a risk threshold of 10%.
Conclusions
The D:A:D model was miscalibrated for CVD risk among PLWH engaged in HIV care at an urban safety‐net HIV clinic, which may be related to differences in case‐mix and baseline CVD risk. Nevertheless, the HIV D:A:D model may be useful for decisions about CVD intervention for high‐risk patients.
Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) is a major barrier to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).
We assessed changes in the incidence of TRM and overall survival from ...1985 through 2004 in 5,972 patients younger than age 50 years who received myeloablative conditioning and HCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) or second complete remission (CR2).
Among HLA-matched sibling donor transplantation recipients, the relative risks (RRs) for TRM were 0.5 and 0.3 for 2000 to 2004 compared with those for 1985 to 1989 in patients in CR1 and CR2, respectively (P < .001). The RRs for all causes of mortality in the latter period were 0.73 (P = .001) and 0.60 (P = .005) for the CR1 and CR2 groups, respectively. Among unrelated donor transplantation recipients, the RRs for TRM were 0.73 (P = .095) and 0.58 (P < .001) for 2000 to 2004 compared with those in 1990 to 1994 in the CR1 and CR2 groups, respectively. Reductions in mortality were observed in the CR2 group (RR, 0.74; P = .03) but not in the CR1 group.
Our results suggest that innovations in transplantation care since the 1980s and 1990s have reduced the risk of TRM in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for AML and that this reduction has been accompanied by improvements in overall survival.
•Statin prescription guidelines recently changed for people living with HIV (PLWH).•We estimated that guideline change increased statin prescription by 25% among PLWH.•A sizable proportion of ...eligible PLWH still were not prescribed statins.•Strategies are needed to enhance adoption of statin prescription guidelines.
The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines were updated in 2018 to explicitly recommend statin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention among people living with HIV (PLWH), but little is known about the effect of this guideline change. We aimed to assess the effect of the 2018 ACC/AHA guideline change on statin prescription among PLWH. We used data from an institutional HIV registry to identify PLWH aged 40–75 years, engaged in HIV care between June 2016 and May 2021, had a LDL cholesterol between 70 and 189 mg/dl, 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score ≥7.5%, no prior statin prescription, and no history of diabetes or ASCVD. Our outcome of interest was a new statin prescription within 12 months of eligibility. We estimated standardized risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence limits (CL) by comparing prescription probabilities before and after guideline change. Our study population comprised 251 PLWH (171 before, 80 after the guideline change), of whom 57% were aged <55 years, 82% were male, and 45% were non-Hispanic black. The standardized 12-month statin prescription risk was 43% (95% CL: 31%, 60%) after the guideline change and 19% (95% CL: 13%, 26%) before the guideline change (RD = 25%, 95% CL: 9.1%, 40%). Our results suggest that the 2018 ACC/AHA guideline change increased statin prescription among PLWH, but a sizable proportion of eligible PLWH were not prescribed statin. Future studies are needed to identify strategies to enhance implementation of statin prescription guidelines among PLWH.
Abstract The survival of patients with relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is very poor. We studied the outcomes of 302 ...patients who underwent secondary allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from an unrelated donor (URD) using either myeloablative (n = 242) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 60) regimens reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range, 2 to 160 months), the probability of treatment-related mortality was 44% (95% confidence interval CI, 38%-50%) at 1-year. The 5-year incidence of relapse was 32% (95% CI, 27%-38%), and that of overall survival was 22% (95% CI, 18%-27%). Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly better overal survival with RIC regimens (hazard ratio HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.75; P <.001), with Karnofsky Performance Status score ≥90% (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.82: P = .001) and in cytomegalovirus-negative recipients (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94; P = .022). A longer interval (>18 months) from auto-HCT to URD allo-HCT was associated with significantly lower riak of relapse (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.38; P <.001) and improved leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.84; P = .006). URD allo-HCT after auto-HCT relapse resulted in 20% long-term leukemia-free survival, with the best results seen in patients with a longer interval to secondary URD transplantation, with a Karnofsky Performance Status score ≥90%, in complete remission, and using an RIC regimen. Further efforts to reduce treatment-related mortaility and relapse are still needed.
The survival of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Autologous HCT) is very poor. We studied the outcomes of 302 patients who underwent ...secondary allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT) from an unrelated donor (URD) using either myeloablative (n=242) or reduced-intensity conditioning regimens (RIC, n=60) reported to CIBMTR. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 2–160), the probability of treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 44% (95%CI 38–50) at 1-year. The 5-year incidence of relapse and overall survival (OS) was 32% (95%CI 27–38) and 22% (95%CI 18–27), respectively. In multivariate analysis significantly better OS was observed with RIC regimens (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.51, 95%CI 0.35–0.75, p<0.001), with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥90% (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.47–0.82, p=0.001) and in CMV-negative recipients (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.44–0.94, p=0.022). Longer interval (>18 months) from Autologous HCT to URD Allo-HCT was associated with significantly lower Relapse risk (HR 0.19, 95%CI 0.09–0.38, p<0.001) and improved LFS (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.34–0.84, p=0.006). URD Allo-HCT after Autologous HCT relapse results in 20% long-term leukemia-free survival, with best results with longer interval to secondary URD transplantation, KPS ≥90%, in complete remission, and using RIC regimens. Further efforts to reduce TRM and relapse are still needed.