5 Zanimivo dejstvo, ki osvetljuje blizino glagolov determiniranega premikanja z dovrsniki, je pogled v korpus Nova beseda in iskanje povezave med 'zaceti' in glagoloma 'iti' in 'hoditi'. Kot je dobro ...znano, se dovrsnik ne povezuje z glagolom 'zaceti'. Glagol iti je dovrsen in nedovrsen, zato povezava 'zaceti' in 'iti' ni vnaprej izkljucena, kadar 'iti' nastopa v nedovrsnem vidu. In vendar pogled v korpus Nova beseda pokaze za zvezo 'zacel iti' 5 zadetkov, v nobenem iti ne nastopa v neprenesenem pomenu, 'zacela iti' - 6 zadetkov, v enem primeru v neprenesenem pomenu ( Bela ovca se je prestopila in zacela iti vzdolz laza ), 'zaceli iti' - 5 zadetkov (2 primera v neprenesenem pomenu). Na drugi strani dobimo za 'zacel hoditi' 175 zadetkov, 'zacela hoditi' - 94 zadetkov in 'zaceli hoditi' - 75 zadetkov. Ne da bi sicer preverjala pomene oblike 'hoditi', je razlika v stevilu zadetkov pomenljiva.
3.1 S stevilnimi predponami tvorijo glagoli detenniniranega premikanja nove dovrsnike, ki imajo svoje sekundame nedovrsnike. Nepreneseni pomen teh glagolov je krajevni. Zanimivo je, da je pri ...nekaterih glagolih premikanja {udmu, necmu, ee3mu, necmu) osnova sekundamega nedovrsnika identicna glagolu nedetenniniranega premikanja. Nastejmo torej tvoijenke glagola udmu, ceprav velja tak nacin tvorjenja novih glagolov za vso skupino. Prvi clen je dovrsni, dmgi nedovrsni: npuùmu - npuxodumb ('priti'), eoùmu - exodumb (Vstopiti1), ewùrnu - euxodumb ('iti ven, izstopiti'), 3aùmu - 3axodunib ('zaiti, stopiti v kaj'), oôoùmu - oôxoàunib ('obiti, iti okoli cesa'), omoùmu - omxoàumb ('oditi stran, umakniti se'), noàoùmu - nodxodumb ('stopiti k cemu, priblizati se'), eoùmu - exodumb ('stopiti s cesa, spustiti se'), nepetmiu - nepexoàumb ('preiti, preckati, iti cez kaj'), npoùmu - npoxodumb ('iti cez kaj, mimo cesa'),vùmu -yxoàumb ('oditi'). 1 Vrste glagolskega dejanja (cnocoö raarojitHoro ^encTBHU, .Aktionsart) razlicni avtorji pojmujejo nekoliko razlicno. Toporisic pris va glagole premikanja med vrste glagolskega dejanja in se torej v tem pogledu uvrsca med jezikoslovce, ki pojmujejo vrste glagolskega dejanja sirse V RG (1982: 585) so vr-s ste glagloskega dejanja opredeljene ozje: kot » ji e kh c ko - r paM m ara u e c kh e paspanti marojioB« in »TaKne ceMaHTHKO-cjioBooöpasoBaTejiBHBie rpynnnpoBKH marojioB, b ocHOBe KOTOpBix necear MO/jHcjmKanHH (npeoöpasoBaHHu) 3HaueHnn 6e3npe<|)HKCHBix (npenMymecTBeHHO HeMOTHBHpoBaHHBix ) rjiarojioB c TOUKH 3peHHU BpeMeHHBIX, KOJIHUeCTBeHHBIX H Cnen;HaJlBHO-pe3yJlBTaTHBHBIX XapaKTepHCTHK. Ba^KHO npn 3T0M, uto Taxne MOUHc})HKau;HH 3HaueHHH Bceraa h oöusaTejiBHO (popMajibuo ebipaotceubi npec})HKCOM, cyc})(J)kcom hjih npe4>HKcajiBHO-cy4)4>HKcajiBHBiMH 4>opMaHTaMH.« (poudarek A. D.). Zgledi so nemb-sanemb kot zacetna vrsta glagolskega dejanja in drugi. V tej definiciji se torej poudarjajo tudi formalne znacilnosti posameznih vrst glagolskega dejanja. Tudi isAcenko (1960: 209), ki imenuje to kategorijo 'coBepmaeMOCTB raarojiBHoro uencTEHu', poudarja, da so za posamezne vrste glagolskega dejanja pomembne formalne la-s stnosti. Isacenko opozarja, da nekateri avtorji ne smatrajo, da bi morale biti posamezne vrste glagolskega dejanja tudi formalno besedotvomo oznacene, ampak mednje pristevajo poleg takih tudi samo pomenske skupine, za katere je znacilen ta ali oni znacaj ali nacin dejanja (xapaKTep ^encTHBHu). Po Isacenku druzi skupino glagolov premikanja ravno 'xapaKTep ^encTHBu' (Hcauehko 1960: 301, 309). Na vlogo predponskih obrazil pri tvorjenju vrst glagolskega dejanja opozarja vidovic Muha (1993: 162), tako razvrsca glagole v svoji raziskavi glagolov v slovenskem knjiznem jeziku 16. st. M. merse (1995: 286-313).
This article discusses some differences in the use of Russian posel resp. Slovene sel (in the frame of Dickey's Eastern and Western type of aspectual usage in Slavic languages), and claims that the ...Slovene verb of motion is bi-aspectual. Adapted from the source document
The article deals with the differences between verbs of motion in Russian and Slovene, particularly with some differences between prefixed verbs with po- derived from the central pairs udmu-xodumb ...and iti-hoditi. Adapted from the source document
In the article the use of perfective resp. imperfective aspect in the historical present in Slovene is discussed. As stated in several studies describing aspectual usage in Slavic languages (e.g., ...Plotnikova, Derganc, Dickey, Bondarko) in Slovene in the historical present no neutralization of aspects takes place. The opposition between perfective and imperfective verbs basically remains the same as in the past tense, the perfective present describing single concluded actions and the imperfective present expressing activities and states in progress, iterativity etc. Examples of such usage in the classical historical present as well as in related cases, e. g. scenic remarks, jokes, time-tables of events are given. Special attention is paid to some examples pointed out by Dickey suggesting that - contrary to the above statement - the usage of the imperfective aspect in presenting a sequence of events is also possible in the Slovene historical present. The claim of this article is that such usage is predominantly found in modern belles lettres and remains peripheral in comparison with the 'classical' historical present. Such usage can be interpreted as a figurative use of the present tense describing actions in progress at the moment of speaking. Adapted from the source document
PDF
