Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a group of inflammatory myopathies that was distinguished from polymyositis in 2004. Most IMNMs are associated with anti-signal recognition particle ...(anti-SRP) or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coA reductase (anti-HMGCR) myositis-specific autoantibodies, although ~20% of patients with IMNM remain seronegative. These associations have led to three subclasses of IMNM: anti-SRP-positive IMNM, anti-HMGCR-positive IMNM and seronegative IMNM. IMNMs are frequently rapidly progressive and severe, displaying high serum creatine kinase levels, and failure to treat IMNMs effectively may lead to severe muscle impairment. In patients with seronegative IMNM, disease can be concomitant with cancer. Research into IMNM pathogenesis has shown that anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR autoantibodies cause weakness and myofibre necrosis in mice, suggesting that, as well as being diagnostic biomarkers of IMNM, they may play a key role in disease pathogenesis. Therapeutically, treatments such as rituximab or intravenous immunoglobulins can now be discussed for IMNM, and targeted therapies, such as anticomplement therapeutics, may be a future option for patients with refractory disease.
Inflammatory myopathies are rare diseases. Their diagnosis criteria are historically based on their clinical phenotype (topography of the muscle weakness, presence of skin lesions and/or of ...extra-skin/muscle signs) and the presence of inflammatory infiltrates on muscle biopsy. However, the recent discovery of different myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) or myositis-associated antibodies (MAA) permitted to revisit these old classifications. This review covers recent findings in clinical and pathological phenotypes regarding prognosis, associated cancer and response to the treatment based on MSA/MAA categorization.
Since the mid-1970s, about 20 MSA or MAA were discovered year after year (by immunoprecipitation). Now commercial kits (mainly dot line assays) permit their detection routinely which is clearly a help for the diagnosis but also give some key indications on clinical features, risk of associated cancers and response to the treatments.
Overlap myositis is associated with antisynthetase antibodies (Abs) or those associated with sclerodermia (anti-RNP, Ku and PM-ScL). Dermatomyositis is associated with anti-Mi2, small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE), nuclear matrix protein-2 (NXP2), TIF-1γ or melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) Abs. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies are associated with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) Abs. One third of inclusion body myositis' patients also presented anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) Abs. The risk of associated cancers is elevated with anti-TIF-1γ, NXP2 or HMGCR Abs.
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are heterogeneous in their pathophysiologic features and prognosis. The emergence of myositis-specific autoantibodies suggests that subgroups of patients exist.
To ...develop a new classification scheme for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies based on phenotypic, biological, and immunologic criteria.
An observational, retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of the French myositis network. Patients identified from referral centers for neuromuscular diseases were included from January 1, 2003, to February 1, 2016. Of 445 initial patients, 185 patients were excluded and 260 adult patients with myositis who had complete data and defined historical classifications for polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis were enrolled. All patients were tested for anti-histidyl-ARN-t- synthetase (Jo1), anti-threonine-ARN-t-synthetase (PL7), anti-alanine-ARN-t-synthetase (PL12), anti-complex nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase (Mi2), anti-Ku, anti-polymyositis/systemic scleroderma (PMScl), anti-topoisomerase 1 (Scl70), and anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibodies. A total of 708 variables were collected per patient (eg, cancer, lung involvement, and myositis-specific antibodies).
Unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis to aggregate patients in subgroups.
Among 260 participants (163 62.7% women; mean age, 59.7 years; median age range, 61.5 years 48-71 years), 4 clusters of patients emerged. Cluster 1 (n = 77) included patients who were male, white, and older than 60 years and had finger flexor and quadriceps weakness and findings of vacuolated fibers and mitochondrial abnormalities. Cluster 1 regrouped patients who had inclusion body myositis (72 of 77 patients 93.5%; 95% CI, 85.5%-97.8%; P < .001). Cluster 2 (n = 91) regrouped patients who were women and had high creatine phosphokinase levels, necrosis without inflammation, and anti-SRP or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies corresponding to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (53 of 91 58.2%; 95% CI, 47.4%-68.5%; P < .001). Cluster 3 (n = 52) regrouped patients who had dermatomyositis rash and anti-Mi2, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), or anti-transcription intermediary factor-1γ (TIF1γ) antibodies, mainly corresponding with patients who had dermatomyositis (43 of 52 82.7%; 95% CI, 69.7%-91.8%; P < .001). Cluster 4 (n = 40) was defined by the presence of anti-Jo1 or anti-PL7 antibodies corresponding to antisynthetase syndrome (36 of 40 90.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%; P < .001). The classification of an independent cohort (n = 50) confirmed the 4 clusters (Cohen κ light, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9).
These findings suggest a classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with 4 subgroups: dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and antisynthetase syndrome. This classification system suggests that a targeted clinical-serologic approach for identifying idiopathic inflammatory myopathies may be warranted.
Inhibitors of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR inhibitors) are used as antiproliferative immunosuppressive drugs and have many clinical applications in various drug combinations. Experience in ...transplantation studies has been gained regarding the side effect profile of these drugs and the potential benefits and limitations compared with other immunosuppressive agents. This article reviews the adverse effects of mTOR inhibitors in solid organ transplantation, with special attention given to mechanisms hypothesized to cause adverse events and their management strategies.
Over the past few years, myositis-specific autoantibodies played an increasing role in the inflammatory idiopathic myositis definition. They became the critical immunological marker for ...immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy diagnosis (IMNM) since the paradigm switch from histological to serological criteria.
This review is focused on the key role of the anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP) and the anti-3-Hydroxy-3-MethylGlutaryl-Coenzyme A Reductase (anti-HMGCR) antibodies in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy.
Anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR antibodies are robust diagnostic tools in case of both the classical subacute form and the slowly progressive form of IMNM that may mimic muscular dystrophy. Anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR patients share clinical, biological and histological features with some antibody-associated specificity. Anti-SRP patients harbour more severe muscle weakness and atrophy with severe muscle damage on magnetic resonance imaging study. Approximately 10–20% of anti-SRP patients develop extramuscular symptoms, especially lung interstitial disease. Conversely, anti-HMGCR patients are often associated with statin exposure. In both cases, patients have a poor outcome with frequent relapse and the use of combined immunotherapy. Of note, various data suggest a direct pathogenic role of these antibodies reinforcing the interest in targeted therapeutic strategy.
•Anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP antibodies are the cornerstone of IMNM diagnosis.•IMNM without autoantibody is associated with cancer risk.•Treatments target autoantibodies because of their potential direct pathogenic role.
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of diseases characterized by immune-mediated muscular lesions that may be associated with extra-muscular manifestations involving skin, lungs, ...heart or joints. Four main groups of IIM can be distinguished: dermatomyositis (DM), overlap myositis including mainly anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) are increasingly recognized as valuable tools for diagnosis, classification and prognosis of IIM. For example, ASS is associated with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies (anti-Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, …), IMNM with anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR; IBM with anti-cytosolic 5’nucleotidase 1A (cN1A), and DM with anti-Mi-2, anti-MDA-5, anti-TIF-1γ, anti-NXP-2 and anti-SAE. Moreover, anti-MDA-5 is associated with amyopathic myositis and interstitial lung disease and anti-TIF-1γ and anti-NXP-2 with juvenile DM as well as malignancy in patients >40 years. Most MSA have initially been discovered by immunoprecipitation. In routine laboratories, however, MSA are screened for by indirect immunofluorescence and identified by (automated) monospecific immunoassays or by multispecific immunoassays (mainly line/dot immunoassays). Validation of these (multispecific) assays is a challenge as the antibodies are rare and the assays diverse. In this review, we give an overview of the (clinical) performance characteristics of monospecific assays as well as of multispecific assays for detection of MSA. Although most assays are clinically useful, there are differences between techniques and between manufacturers. We discuss that efforts are needed to harmonize and standardize detection of MSA.
•Autoantibodies are recognized as important biomarkers for the distinct entities of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.•The HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay is inadequate as screening assay for myositis-specific autoantibodies.•Incorporation of immunoassays for myositis-specific antibodies in clinical practice requires appropriate clinical evaluation.
Objective
Immune‐mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNM) may be associated with either anti–signal recognition protein (SRP) or anti–3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐CoA reductase (HMGCR) antibodies (Abs), ...and the titer of these Abs is correlated with disease activity. We investigated whether anti‐SRP and anti‐HMGCR Abs could be involved in muscle damage.
Methods
Muscle biopsies of patients were analyzed for atrophy and regeneration by measuring fiber size and by performing immunostaining of neonatal myosin heavy chain. To further understand the role of the Abs in the pathology, we performed muscle cell coculture with the Abs. Atrophy and regeneration were evaluated based on the myotube surface area as well as gene and cytokine profiles.
Results
In muscle biopsies of patients with anti‐SRP+ and anti‐HMGCR+ Abs, a large number of small fibers corresponding to both atrophic and regenerating fibers were observed. In vitro, anti‐SRP and anti‐HMGCR Abs induced muscle fiber atrophy and increased the transcription of MAFbx and TRIM63. In addition, the muscle fiber atrophy was associated with high levels of inflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)‐6, and reactive oxygen species. In the presence of anti‐SRP or anti‐HMGCR Abs, mechanisms involved in muscle regeneration were also impaired due to a defect of myoblast fusion. This defect was associated with a decreased production of IL‐4 and IL‐13. The addition of IL‐4 and/or IL‐13 totally rescued fusion capacity.
Interpretation
These data show that molecular mechanisms of atrophy and regeneration are affected and contribute to loss of muscle function occurring in IMNM. This emphasizes the potential interest of targeted therapies addressing these mechanisms. Ann Neurol 2017;81:538–548
Although idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of diseases nearly all patients display muscle inflammation. Originally, muscle biopsy was considered as the gold standard ...for IIM diagnosis. The development of muscle imaging led to revisiting not only the IIM diagnosis strategy but also the patients’ follow‐up. Different techniques have been tested or are in development for IIM including positron emission tomography, ultrasound imaging, ultrasound shear wave elastography, though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most widely used technique in routine. Whereas guidelines on muscle imaging in myositis are lacking here we reviewed the relevance of muscle imaging for both diagnosis and myositis patients’ follow‐up. We propose recommendations about when and how to perform MRI on myositis patients, and we describe new techniques that are under development.
Muscle imaging and especially muscle MRI is a powerful technique for both IIM diagnosis and follow‐up. Muscle MRI is actually the best muscle imaging technique in routine, and it is widely used, but guidelines determining when and how to use it in myositis patients are lacking.
In addition to restoring anti-tumor immune responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may also induce immune-related adverse events (irAE) that can affect any organ. We aim to determine the ...spectrum, timing, clinical features, and fatalities of rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (RMS-irAE) associated with ICI.
We performed an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the World Health Organization international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase, from inception to January 2019. RMS-irAE reporting rate on ICI versus full database was performed using disproportionality analysis with computation of reporting-odds-ratios (ROR) and a Bayesian disproportional estimate (information component, IC). IC025 (lower end of the IC 95% credibility interval) >0 is deemed significant.
We identified 1288 RMS-irAE significantly associated with ICI: polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 76, ROR = 14.6 11.6–18.4, IC025 = 3.34), sarcoidosis (n = 94; ROR = 9.6 7.9–11.9; IC025 = 2.85), Sjogren's syndrome (n = 49; ROR = 6.9 5.2–9.2; IC025 = 2.24), myositis (n = 465; ROR = 4.9 4.5–5.4; IC025 = 2.12), arthritis (n = 606; ROR = 1.4 1.3–1.5; IC025 = 0.34) and scleroderma (n = 17; ROR = 2.0 1.2–3.2; IC025 = 0.17). Arthritis, myositis, and Sjogren's syndrome were over-reported in patients treated with ICI combination versus those treated with ICI monotherapy (ROR = 1.6–2.9, p < .05) and more frequently reported on anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy vs. anti-CTLA4 monotherapy (2.1–4.4, p < .05). Median time to onset occurred early for myositis (31 days 19.2–57.8) and was the most delayed for scleroderma (395 days 323.8–457.2, p < .0001). The fatality rate for RMS-irAE ranged from 24% for myositis (n = 106/441) (up to 56.7% with concurrent myocarditis) to 0–6.7% for other RMS-irAE (p < .0001).
Clinicians should be aware of the spectrum of RMS-irAE. Myositis can be particularly life-threatening, particularly when associated with myocarditis.
•We identified over 1000 individual case safety reports related to RMS-irAE induced by ICI.•RMS-irAE encompassed arthritis, myositis, sarcoidosis, polymyalgia rheumatica, Sjogren's syndrome, and scleroderma.•Myositis occurred early within weeks after initiation of ICI therapy and carried a high fatality rate, particularly when concurrent myocarditis was reported; whereas other RMS-irAE had a low mortality burden.
PDF
