Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
As COVID-19 related mortality is higher in haemodialysis patients than in the general population, proper vaccination strategies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus have utmost ...importance. It has been previously shown that mRNA vaccines (e.g. BNT162b2) can generate >95% of seropositivity in haemodialysis patients 1. On the other hand, the seropositivity rate reached by the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac®) was around 80%. In this study, we aimed to analyse the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in haemodialysis patients for 6 months and compare it with the healthy controls.
METHOD
Haemodialysis patients who were vaccinated either by BNT162b2 or CoronaVac® and who continued their regular controls for 6 months were involved in the study. Those who had previous or active SARS-CoV-2 infection, who had malignancies and those who had received immunosuppressive drugs in the previous 12 month were excluded from the study. SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were measured by a commercial test after the first doses of the vaccines and at the end of the sixth month. Healthy healthcare workers who were vaccinated with similar vaccine schemes were taken as the control group.
RESULTS
We recruited 85 haemodialysis patients who had received their first doses of either vaccine. Of them, 4 patients died; 3 patients were hospitalized because of COVID-19 infection during the follow-up; 9 patients missed at least one of their regular controls; and 2 patients were diagnosed with malignancy. A total of 26 patients experienced asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection during the follow-up period. SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were measured at the end of the sixth month for the remaining 41 patients. Sero-positivity significantly decreased at the end of the sixth month for both vaccines, but the BNT162b2 group (n = 22) still had better seropositivity than CoronaVac® (n = 19) group (81% versus 50%; P = .03). In contrast, the seropositivity of healthy controls, even with the inactivated vaccine, was 96%. When one booster dose was applied, 90% of seropositivity could be maintained in the BNT162b2 group at the sixth month.
CONCLUSION
BNT162b2 vaccine generates more persistent antibodies than inactivated vaccines in haemodialysis patients. However, when compared with the healthy controls at the end of the sixth month, antibody titers decrease more profoundly in haemodialysis patients. The booster dose can maintain the antibody levels and should be applied at least every 6 months.
Introduction
Vaccines generally have reduced effectiveness in hemodialysis patients and a similar condition may also apply for the SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. The aim of this study was to analyze humoral ...responses of hemodialysis patients to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines.
Methods
Eighty‐five maintenance hemodialysis patients who received either inactivated or mRNA SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines were investigated. Antibody levels were measured by a commercial antibody kit, which detected antibodies toward receptor binding domain of the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein. Comparative analyzes were carried between vaccine groups and with a control group of 103 healthy volunteers.
Results
Seropositivity rate and antibody levels were significantly lower in hemodialysis patients who received inactivated vaccine (p = 0.000). While mRNA vaccine had better immunogenicity, both vaccines protected from symptomatic infection when seropositivity was achieved.
Discussion/Conclusion
When used in the same dose with the general population, inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines generate reduced humoral response in hemodialysis patients. mRNA vaccines have better immunogenicity in this group.
Background In the presence of decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the risk of morbidity and mortality caused by cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increased markedly. Increased coronary artery ...calcification (CAC) is proposed as a pathogenetic link between CVD and chronic kidney disease. We examined the frequency and severity of CAC in living kidney donors to test the hypothesis that decreased GFR is associated with increased CAC. Methods We used multidetector spiral computed tomography to examine CAC in 101 living kidney donors and 99 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects without diabetes and a history of coronary artery disease. The extent of calcification was measured by means of the Agatston score. GFR was calculated by using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. The frequency of risk factors for coronary artery disease was compared in kidney donors and controls, and the relation between kidney donors’ clinical characteristics and the presence or absence of CAC was examined. Results CAC frequency and mean calcification scores were similar between kidney donors (13.9%; 4.5 ± 22.6) and controls (17.2%; 13.2 ± 89.2). CAC was not associated with decreased GFR, and the correlation between CAC and GFR was not statistically significant. Kidney donors with calcification were more likely to be older ( P = 0.003) and male ( P = 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted analysis showed an association between greater parathormone levels (odds ratio, 1.023; 95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.045; P = 0.037) and CAC in kidney donors. Conclusion A mild decrease in GFR without the presence of diabetes does not seem to be associated with increased CAC. These findings need to be confirmed in different and larger study populations.
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among renal transplant recipients. In the general population, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and progression of CAC are predictors of ...future cardiac risk. We conducted a study to determine the progression of CAC in renal transplant recipients; we also examined the factors associated with progression and the impact of the analytic methods used to determine CAC progression.
We used multi-detector computed tomography to examine CAC in 150 prevalent renal transplant recipients, who did not have a documented cardiovascular disease. A baseline and a follow-up scan were performed and changes in CAC scores were evaluated in each patient individually, to calculate the incidence of CAC progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of CAC progression.
Baseline CAC prevalence was 35.3% and the mean CAC score was 60.0 ± 174.8. At follow-up scan that was performed after an average of 2.8 ± 0.4 years, CAC prevalence increased to 64.6% and the mean CAC score to 94.9 ± 245.7. Progression of individual CAC score was found between 28.0 and 38.0%, depending on the method used to define progression. In patients with baseline CAC, median annualized rate of CAC progression was 11.1. Baseline CAC, high triglyceride and bisphosphonate use were the independent determinants of CAC progression.
Renal transplantation does not stop or reverse CAC. Progression of CAC is the usual evolution pattern of CAC in renal transplant recipients. Beside baseline CAC, high triglyceride level and bisphosphonate use were associated with progression of CAC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
There is not enough data on the post-COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) period for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients affected from COVID-19. We aimed to compare the ...clinical and laboratory data retrospectively obtained in the follow-up of PD patients after COVID-19 with a control PD group.
METHOD
This study, supported by the Turkish Society of Nephrology, is a national multicenter retrospectively case–control study involving adult PD patients with confirmed COVID-19, using data collected from 21 April 2021 to 11 June 2021. A control PD group was also formed from each PD unit, from patients with similar characteristics but who did not have COVID-19. Patients in the active period of COVID-19 were not included. Data at the end of the first month and within the first 90 days, as well as other outcomes, including mortality, were investigated.
RESULTS
A total of 223 patients (COVID-19 group: 113, control group: 110) from 28 centers were included. The duration of PD in both groups was similar median (IQR):3.0 (1.88–6.0) years and 3.0 (2.0–5.6), but the patient age of the COVID-19 group was lower than the control group 50 (IQR:40–57) years and 56 (IQR:46–64) years, P < 0.001. PD characteristics and baseline laboratory data were similar in both groups, except serum albumin and hemoglobin levels on Day 28, which were significantly lower in the COVID-19 group. In the COVID-19 group, respiratory symptoms, rehospitalization, lower respiratory tract infection, change in PD modality, UF failure and hypervolemia were significantly higher on the 28th day. There was no significant difference in laboratory parameters at Day 90. Only one (0.9%) patient in the COVID-19 group died within 90 days. There was no death in the control group. Respiratory symptoms, malnutrition and hypervolemia were significantly higher at Day 90 in the COVID-19 group.
CONCLUSION
Mortality in the first 90 days after COVID-19 in PD patients with COVID-19 is not different from the control PD group. However, some of these patients continue to experience significant problems, especially respiratory system symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia.
There are not enough data on the post-CO-VID-19 period for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients affected from COVID-19. We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory data of PD patients after COVID-19 ...with a control PD group.
This study, supported by the Turkish Society of Nephrology, is a national, multicenter retrospective case-control study involving adult PD patients with confirmed COVID-19, using data collected from April 21, 2021, to June 11, 2021. A control PD group was also formed from each PD unit, from patients with similar characteristics but without COVID-19. Patients in the active period of COVID-19 were not included. Data at the end of the first month and within the first 90 days, as well as other outcomes, including mortality, were investigated.
A total of 223 patients (COVID-19 group: 113, control group: 110) from 27 centers were included. The duration of PD in both groups was similar (median IQR: 3.0 1.88-6.0 years and 3.0 2.0-5.6), but the patient age in the COVID-19 group was lower than that in the control group (50 IQR: 40-57 years and 56 IQR: 46-64 years, p < 0.001). PD characteristics and baseline laboratory data were similar in both groups, except serum albumin and hemoglobin levels on day 28, which were significantly lower in the COVID-19 group. In the COVID-19 group, respiratory symptoms, rehospitalization, lower respiratory tract infection, change in PD modality, UF failure, and hypervolemia were significantly higher on the 28th day. There was no significant difference in laboratory parameters at day 90. Only 1 (0.9%) patient in the COVID-19 group died within 90 days. There was no death in the control group. Respiratory symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia were significantly higher at day 90 in the COVID-19 group.
Mortality in the first 90 days after COVID-19 in PD patients with COVID-19 was not different from the control PD group. However, some patients continued to experience significant problems, especially respiratory system symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia.
Abstract
Purpose: It is well established that diabetic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients have a higher mortality rate than the other PD population. This study was designed to determine the overall ...predictors of survival and compared mortality and morbidity between diabetic and non-diabetic Turkish PD patients. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study with 915 PD patients 217 had diabetes mellitus (DM). Serum albumin, PTH, HbA1c, co-morbid diseases, dialysis adequacy (Kt/V), and peritoneal transport characteristics as well as peritonitis episodes and ultrafiltration failure during the follow-up period were recorded. Results: DM patients were older and had more co-morbidities than non-DM patients. Peritonitis rates were higher in DM patients (one episode per 35.9 patient months) compared to non-DM patients (one episode per 41.5 patient months) (p < 0.001). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patient survival was significantly lower in DM patients with the 2-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates of 90.8%, 87.8% and 78.2% in non-diabetics and 80.9%, 70.4% and 61.2% in diabetics, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, DM (HR 1.5, p = 0.022), age (HR 1.03, p < 0.001), baseline serum albumin (HR 0.39, p < 0.001), heart failure (HR 0.038, p = 0.038), peripheral artery disease (HR 1.83, p = 0.025) and amputation (HR 4.1, p = 0.009) at baseline were significant predictors of overall mortality. Conclusions: Patient survival is lower in diabetic compared to non-diabetic patients on PD. Peritonitis rates were also higher in diabetic PD patients. DM, older age, albumin level and cardiovascular co-morbidities are predictors of mortality
Vancomycin is one of the drugs used in the peritonitis treatment regimen of peritoneal dialysis patients. Intraperitoneal route is generally preferred to provide rapid elimination of infective ...agents. Systemic toxicities of certain drugs after intraperitoneal administration are not very clear. The same also applies to vancomycin, although it has a considerable amount of systemic absorption after intraperitoneal administration. We herein report a case of severe thrombocytopenia, which was seen during the treatment of a peritonitis attack in a peritoneal dialysis patient. Culture studies revealed methicillin resistant staphylococci as the causative agent and the patient received intraperitoneal vancomycin per sensitivity analysis. Thrombocyte levels dropped abruptly to 3,900/μl after 10 days of vancomycin treatment. Clinical criteria pointed out to vancomycin‐related immune thrombocytopenia. Platelet levels did not recover with initial dexamethasone treatment and platelet transfusions. In the meantime, the clinical course was also complicated with intracranial bleeding. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was applied and dexamethasone was switched to high‐dose methylprednisolone. This latter treatment generated a response and platelet levels gradually increased to normal levels. The patient could be discharged without any sequelae. There have been two previous intraperitoneal vancomycin‐related immune thrombocytopenia cases in the literature. Previous cases were reviewed, and the present case was given in comparison with the previous cases.
PDF
