•In total, more than 4000 adult patients are currently treated with PT across Europe annually.•CNS and HNC tumours are the most frequently treated tumour sites.•Most centres use national or ...institutional guidelines for selecting patients for PT.•Treatments are usually reimbursed by national health care systems.•Most patients are included in prospective data registries and clinical trials.
Major differences exist among proton therapy (PT) centres regarding PT delivery in adult cancer patient. To obtain insight into current practice in Europe, we performed a survey among European PT centres.
We designed electronic questionnaires for eight tumour sites, focusing on four main topics: 1) indications and patient selection methods; 2) reimbursement; 3) on-going or planned studies, 4) annual number of patients treated with PT.
Of 22 centres, 19 (86%) responded. In total, 4233 adult patients are currently treated across Europe annually, of which 46% consists of patients with central nervous system tumours (CNS), 15% head and neck cancer (HNC), 15% prostate, 9% breast, 5% lung, 5% gastrointestinal, 4% lymphoma, 0.3% gynaecological cancers. CNS are treated in all participating centres (n = 19) using PT, HNC in 16 centres, lymphoma in 10 centres, gastrointestinal in 10 centres, breast in 7 centres, prostate in 6 centres, lung in 6 centres, and gynaecological cancers in 3 centres. Reimbursement is provided by national health care systems for the majority of commonly treated tumour sites. Approximately 74% of centres enrol patients for prospective data registration programs. Phase II-III trials are less frequent, due to reimbursement and funding problems. Reasons for not treating certain tumour types with PT are lack of evidence (30%), reimbursement issues (29%) and/or technical limitations (20%).
Across European PT centres, CNS tumours and HNC are the most frequently treated tumour types. Most centres use indication protocols. Lack of evidence for PT and reimbursement issues are the most reported reasons for not treating specific tumour types with PT.
To study the association between hormonal infertility treatment and ovarian neoplasia.
Historical cohort study.
Three university hospitals in Sweden.
A total of 2,768 women assessed and treated for ...infertility and infertility-associated disorders between 1961 and 1975.
Exposed women received clomiphene citrate and/or gonadotropins.
Incidence of ovarian neoplasia.
No overall excess risk of invasive ovarian cancer emerged compared with the general population. In women with gonadotropin treatment for non-ovulatory disorders, the risk was elevated (standardized incidence ratio SIR = 5.89; 95% confidence interval CI 1.91–13.75); four of the five cases reported hCG treatment only, rendering the biological plausibility uncertain. Multivariate analysis within the cohort indicated that treatment with gonadotropins only was associated with an increased risk of invasive cancer (relative risk = 5.28; 95% CI 1.70–16.47). For borderline tumors, a more than threefold overall increase of tumors (SIR = 3.61; 95% CI 1.45–7.44) was noted; women exposed to clomiphene because of ovulatory disorders showed the highest risk (SIR = 7.47; 95% CI 1.54–21.83).
Our findings of increased risk of ovarian cancer after gonadotropins and of borderline tumors after clomiphene treatment need to be interpreted with caution. However, concern is raised, and further research on the long-term safety particularly of modern hormonal infertility treatment in IVF programs is warranted.
A fundamental problem in radiotherapy is the variation of organ at risk (OAR) volumes. Here we present our initial experience in engaging a large Radiation Oncology (RO) community to agree on ...national guidelines for OAR delineations. Our project builds on associated standardization initiatives and invites professionals from all radiotherapy departments nationwide. Presently, one guideline (rectum) has successfully been agreed on by a majority vote. Reaching out to all relevant parties in a timely manner and motivating funding agencies to support the work represented early challenges. Population-based data and a scalable methodological approach are major strengths of the proposed strategy.
Background
Although olaparib, the first poly (adenosine diphosphate ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved, has been used in routine clinical practice for over three years, little has been ...published on its uptake, utilization patterns, and clinical outcomes.
Objective
To examine real-world use and outcomes of olaparib treatment in Swedish patients during the first three years following regulatory approval.
Patients and Methods
This is a population-based cohort study using data from the Swedish national registers. All individuals initiating olaparib treatment from regulatory approval to 31 December 2017 were included. The extent of off-label use was assessed based on recorded diagnoses. Ovarian cancer patients were followed until death or the end of the study period. Starting dose and dose adjustments were assessed. Time to olaparib discontinuation and overall survival were plotted using Kaplan–Meier survival curves.
Results
We identified 109 patients to whom olaparib was dispensed in Sweden during the study period. Nine of these were prescribed olaparib off-label for either breast or prostate cancer and were excluded from further analyses. Median age among the remaining 100 patients with ovarian cancer was 59 years (range: 42–83). Almost all patients (96%) started on the recommended dose (400 mg eight capsules taken twice daily). Dose reductions were explicitly recorded for 14% of patients. Median time to discontinuation was 289 days (95% confidence interval CI: 226; 338). Median overall survival from olaparib initiation was 1002 days (95% CI: 676; not calculable).
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study of olaparib real-world use and outcomes. During the first three years following regulatory approval, olaparib was mainly prescribed to ovarian cancer patients. Ovarian cancer patients stayed on olaparib for a median of 9.5 months and the treatment appeared to be well tolerated.
Introduction
We conducted an evaluation of incidence and survival of women with borderline ovarian tumors in Sweden.
Material and methods
All women diagnosed with borderline ovarian tumor in the ...Swedish Cancer Register 1960–2007 (n = 6252) combined with follow up in the Swedish Death Registry to 1 July 2009 were included. Estimation of age‐standardized relative survival rate according to time periods for diagnosis.
Results
The incidence of borderline ovarian tumors increased during the study period, with a steep increase during the 1980s. The age standardized 5‐year relative survival including all borderline tumors diagnosed 2000–07 was 97% (95% CI 92–99%). In women aged ≤64 years, the 10‐year relative survival related to age at diagnosis of borderline tumors ranged from 95 to 98% and was 89% in women aged 65–74 years. In a multivariable analysis including age and decade of diagnosis relative survival for every decade increased. The 10‐year relative survival in women with mucinous and serous borderline tumors did not differ significantly (p = 0.121).
Conclusions
Results of the present study are reassuring about long‐term survival in women with borderline ovarian tumors. The age‐standardized relative survival rate increased across time periods for diagnosis. There was no difference in long‐term survival between mucinous and serous borderline ovarian tumors.
The beneficial effects of protons are primarily based on reduction of low to intermediate radiation dose bath to normal tissue surrounding the radiotherapy target volume. Despite promise for reduced ...long-term toxicity, the percentage of cancer patients treated with proton therapy remains low. This is probably caused by technical improvements in planning and delivery of photon therapy, and by high cost, low availability and lack of high-level evidence on proton therapy. A number of proton treatment facilities are under construction or have recently opened; there are now two operational Scandinavian proton centres and two more are under construction, thereby eliminating the availability hurdle. Even with the advantageous physical properties of protons, there is still substantial ambiguity and no established criteria related to which patients should receive proton therapy. This topic was discussed in a session at the Nordic Collaborative Workshop on Particle Therapy, held in Uppsala 14-15 November 2019. This paper resumes the Nordic-Baltic perspective on proton therapy indications and discusses strategies to identify patients for proton therapy. As for indications, neoplastic entities, target volume localisation, size, internal motion, age, second cancer predisposition, dose escalation and treatment plan comparison based on the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle or normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were discussed. Importantly, the patient selection process should be integrated into the radiotherapy community and emphasis on collaboration across medical specialties, involvement of key decision makers and knowledge dissemination in general are important factors. An active Nordic-Baltic proton therapy organisation would also serve this purpose.
Although p53 mutations occur in alkylating agent-related leukemias, their frequency and spectrum in leukemias after ovarian cancer have not been addressed. The purpose of this study was to examine ...p53 mutations in leukemias after ovarian cancer, for which treatment with platinum analogues was widely used.
Adequate leukemic or dysplastic cells were available in 17 of 82 cases of leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome that occurred in a multicenter, population-based cohort of 23,170 women with ovarian cancer. Eleven of the 17 received platinum compounds and other alkylating agents with or without DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors and/or radiation. Six received other alkylating agents, in one case, with radiation. Genomic DNA was extracted and p53 exons 5, 6, 7, and 8 were amplified by PCR. Mutations and loss of heterozygosity were analyzed on the WAVE instrument (Transgenomic) followed by selected analysis by sequencing.
Eleven p53 mutations involving all four exons studied and one polymorphism were identified. Genomic DNA analyses were consistent with loss of heterozygosity for four of the mutations. The 11 mutations occurred in 9 cases, such that 6 of 11 leukemias after platinum-based regimens (55%) and 3 of 6 leukemias after other treatments (50%) contained p53 mutations. Two leukemias that occurred after treatment with platinum analogues contained two mutations. Among eight mutations in leukemias after treatment with platinum analogues, there were four G-to-A transitions and one G-to-C transversion.
p53 mutations are common in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after multiagent therapy for ovarian cancer. The propensity for G-to-A transitions may reflect specific DNA damage in leukemias after treatment with platinum analogues.