U radu se na osnovi arhivske građe, periodike i relevantne literature nastoji dati odgovor na istraživačko pitanje jesu li župnici poticali modernizaciju u Hrvatskoj u drugoj polovici 19. stoljeća. ...Na tom se tragu razmatra djelatnost župnika Ivana Nepomuka Jagića. Radi se župniku Župe sv. Šimuna i Jude Tadeja u Markuševcu, koji je ostavio značajan trag posebice na području obrazovanja i gospodarstva, ali i kao saborski zastupnik.
On the basis of archival material, periodicals and relevant literature, the paper tries to answer the research question whether parish priests encouraged modernization in Croatia in the second half of the 19th century. Along these lines, the activities of parish priest Ivan Nepomuk Jagić are being considered. We are talking about the parish priest of the Parish of St. Simon and Jude Thaddeus at Markuševac, who left a significant mark especially in the field of education and economy, but also as a member of parliament.
Katolički bogoslovni fakultet dio je Sveučilišta u Zagrebu od njegova osnutka, no uspostavom komunističke vlasti Fakultet je političkom, a ne zakonodavnom odlukom, 1952. godine isključen sa ...Sveučilišta. Tada je dekan bio Vilim Keilbach. U radu ćemo na osnovi arhivske građe pohranjene u Arhivu Fakulteta i Keilbachove ostavštine, koja se čuva u knjižnici Fakulteta, nastojati utvrditi njegovu ulogu u događajima 1952. godine u smislu organizacije daljnjeg rada Fakulteta u značajno promijenjenim okolnostima.
The Catholic Faculty of Theology was part of the University of Zagreb since the University has been founded. However, in 1952, the Communist government carried out a political, and not a legislative, decision to exclude the Faculty from the University. The Dean of the Faculty at that time was Vilim Keilbach. On the basis of archive material, stored in the Archive of the Faculty, and Keilbach’s legacy, stored in the Library of the Faculty, the article will attempt to determine his role in the events that took place in 1952, in the sense of organisation of work at the Faculty from that time onwards in those significantly changed circumstances.
The second half of the 19th century was marked by the secularisation of the school system, which was present in most European countries, including the Triune Kingdom. However, there were no other ...“threats” to the Church’s historical rights (registers, jurisdiction over marriages, the introduction of divorces) as was the case elsewhere, which is proof of the Church’s deep involvement in political, cultural, and public life, but is also the consequence of unfinished national integration as a precondition for later reforms in the spirit of modernisation. Since there was no conflict between liberals and representatives of the Catholic Church in the Triune Kingdom, it is unsurprising that only two laws that tended towards reducing the competences of the Catholic Church in the spirit of modernisation were enacted during the “Long 19th Century”. One of them was the so-called Mažuranić School Law of 1874. Much was written in the press about this law as it was about to be introduced – most comments were positive, save those of the Katolički list (Catholic Paper), which was of Church provenance. Teachers’ assemblies and associations also supported the reform and modernisation of the education system. It is therefore apparent that Mažuranić and the school reform enjoyed the support of the broader public, save for the Church.The parliamentary debate on Mažuranić’s law showed that those defending the rights of the Church were in the minority. Namely, out of nine members who spoke then, four were against the law, all of them priests (Vučetić, Lehpamer, Mihalović, Šušković). Two priests (Jagić and Broz) generally accepted the draft of the law, while Odžić didn’t express an opinion, although later interventions show that he, too, eventually supported the draft. This should be viewed as the result of differing political stances among the clergy, which were linked to the lack of a political party representing exclusively Catholic interests – this meant that priests were dispersed among existing political options. The introductory speeches by government representative Jurković and parliamentary committee rapporteur Posilović attest to the important role of the Church in society – they were cautious, mild, and specifically highlighted that the goal was to secure the further cooperation between Church and state according to “the spirit of the times”. We believe that the modernisation of the school system was a matter of time, but it was certainly helped by the lack of unified opinions among the clergy as well as the lack of their organised activity. Coordination of the activity of the bishops was also lacking, at least regarding statements. Even though the stance of the Church after the law was enacted was negative, already in September 1875 it became accepting. The clergy continued to be active in public life and politics through party and parliamentary work. Therefore, we can see that the law did not have deeper consequences regarding the relations between the Church and the state, save for the disappointment of a number of priests, who refused to take up the positions of local school superintendents. On the other hand, the School Law is a clear example of the differing political affiliations of the clergy in the Triune Kingdom and the fact that there was no organised activity even when the rights of the Church were threatened, although this could be a result of the fact that none of these threats were serious.
Prilog političkom djelovanju Biočić, Ana
Zbornik Odsjeka za povijesne znanosti Zavoda za povijesne i društvene znanosti Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti,
2018
Journal Article
Based on the materials from the State Archives in Zagreb, periodicals (Zatočnik, Narodne novine) and the relevant literature, the paper explores the conflicts between the Rightist Party (the ...Rightists) and the National Liberal Party (the Nationals), which in April of 1870 expanded from the Zagreb Square to the Royal High School. This was due to dissatisfaction of the Nationals by the Croatian-Hungarian Settlement and the ruling of the Unionist Levin Rauch, and to open animosity of the Rightists against the Nationals because of their conciliatory policy towards Austria. Investigation of student rioters and later conflicts of the teachers at the High School have been shown in great detail. The consequences that those events had both on students and teachers are identified, and the whole event has been discussed within the historical context. The activities of students and teachers were found to have elements of nonviolent resistance.
PDF
