U radu se govori o utjecaju engleskoga jezika na hrvatsko modno nazivlje koje je zabilježeno na hrvatskim modnim portalima Buro 24/7, Fashion.hr i Extravagant. Raščlamba uključuje leksičku i ...semantičku razinu. Korpus je podijeljen na pseudoanglizme, izravne posuðenice, poluprevedenice, doslovne prevedenice i sematičke posuðenice. Propituje se prihvaćenost i prilagodba anglizama u hrvatskom modnom nazivlju te opravdanost njihove uporabe u hrvatskom jeziku.
U
radu se prikazuju i komentiraju sintaktičke napomene koje Dragutin Antun Parčić
zapisuje u Slaganju, prvom dijelu sintakse u Grammatici della lingua slava (illirica) (1873., 21878.). Parčićev se ...sintaktički nauk uspoređuje s
Veberovim u djelima Skladnja ilirskoga jezika (1859.) i Slovnica hèrvatska za srednja učilišta (1871).
Grammatica della lingua slava (illirica)
was written in the
Italian language, which was the official language in the 19th century Dalmatia,
where Parčić spent most of his life. The grammar is divided into two parts:
rječoslovje
(phonetics and phonology,
morphology and word formation) and
skladnja
(syntax). The syntactic part is further divided into three parts:
Slaganje
(Agreement),
Poraba i djelovanje
(Usage and Function)
and
Poredanje rieči
(Word Order). The
paper analyses the first part of the Syntax – Agreement. Syntactic features
described by Dragutin Antun Parčić are compared to those described by Veber in
Skladnja ilirskoga jezika
(1859) and
Slovnica hèrvatska za srednja učilišta
(1871). While Veber describes the sentence, its parts and relations between
them, Parčić only defines the subject, predicate, attribute and object and
describes the relations between them in the Agreement section. Although the
level of the sentence is not included in the Agreement, Parčić mentions the
term simple sentence without explaining it.
Knjiga Amira Kapetanovića "Jezik u starim versima hrvatskim" (Split; Književni krug, 2016.) donosi izbor iz opusa znanstvenika koji je dao značajan prinos proučavanju starijih hrvatskih pisanih ...djela. Naslov knjige povezuje petnaest poglavlja u kojima autor analizira uporabu jezika u dopreporodnim hrvatskim versificiranim tekstovima različitih dijalektalnih obojenja.
MANUSCRIPT OF ITALIAN GRAMMAR WRITTEN BY DRAGUTIN ANTUN PARČIĆ Closet Miscellanea in Bishop’s archive in Krk preserves the less known manuscript of Italian grammar written in Croatian language by ...Franciscan Dragutin Antun Parčić. The grammar lacks a preface which would define its purpose and target group. Still, one can assume that it was intended for students who wanted to enroll in high school in Italian language after attending primary school in Croatian language. The paper analyzes the language concepts of the manuscript. Those concepts are frequently compared with the ones in Grammatica della lingua slava (illirica), grammar of the Croatian language written in Italian. The analysis shows that the manuscript is unfinished and that it is a part of the concept of the Zagreb School of Philology.
Dran je prikaz pretislka djela Vjekoslava Babukića OSNOVA SLOVNICE SLAVJANSKE NARĚČJA ILIRSKOGA (Zagreb, 1836.) (Zagreb, Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 2012.)
The paper analyzes morphological terminology that Dragutin Antun Parčić recorded in Grammatica della lingua slava (illirica) (1873; 1878) and in a manuscript of an Italian grammar that has been ...preserved in the Closet Miscellanea in Bishop’s archive in Krk. Grammatica della lingua slava (illirica) was written in the Italian language, which was the official language in the 19th century Dalmatia, where Parčić spent most of his life. Although it is written in Italian, the author indicates Croatian equivalents in the headlines of major chapters. The manuscript of the Italian grammar was written in the Croatian language. However, two things should be taken into consideration. Since it is a grammar book of the Italian language, many linguistic descriptions that we would expect to find in Croatian grammar books are missing. Therefore, some terminology in the Croatian language has not been recorded. The manuscript remained unfinished (it only deals with syntax and word formation) – which also had an impact on terminology. Apart from Parčić’s grammar books, the analysis also includes grammar books written by the most significant representatives of the Zagreb School of Philology: Vjekoslav Babukić (Osnova slovnice slavjanske narěčja ilirskoga, 1836; Ilirska slovnica, 1854); Antun Mažuranić (Slovnica Hèrvatska za gimnazije i realne škole, 1859, 1861, 1866, 1869); Adolfo Veber (Slovnica hèrvatska za srednja učilišta, 1871, 1873, 1876). The analysis reveals that the grammarians of the Zagreb School of Philology were acquainted with the Croatian linguistic tradition. In their linguistic work they followed and extended the (morphological) terminology of their predecessors.
The paper analyzes orthographic norm in Hrvatsko jedinstvo during the period of The Independent State of Croatia. The normative features of the new morphonological orthographic norm have been listed ...in Ministarska naredba o hrvatskom pravopisu (1941), Zakonska odredba o hrvatskom jeziku, o njegovoj čistoći i o pravopisu (1941), Provedbena naredba k zakonskoj odredbi o hrvatskom jeziku, o njegovoj čistoći i pravopisu (1942) and clarified in two orthography books: Koriensko pisanje (1942) written by Adolf Bratoljub Klaić and Hrvatski pravopis (1944) written by Franjo Cipra and Adolf Bratoljub Klaić. The analysis will also determine when did Hrvatsko jedinstvo start to use dominant morphonological orthographic norm.
PDF
