Summary Background Ixekizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody against the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 17A. We report two studies of ixekizumab compared with placebo or etanercept to ...assess the safety and efficacy of specifically targeting interleukin 17A in patients with widespread moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods In two prospective, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 studies (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3), eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis at least 6 months before baseline (randomisation), 10% or greater body-surface area involvement at both screening and baseline visits, at least a moderate clinical severity as measured by a static physician global assessment (sPGA) score of 3 or more, and a psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score of 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:2:2:2) by computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous placebo, etanercept (50 mg twice weekly), or one injection of 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks after a 160 mg starting dose. Blinding was maintained with a double-dummy design. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were proportions of patients achieving sPGA score 0 or 1 and 75% or greater improvement in PASI at week 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , numbers NCT01597245 and NCT01646177. Findings Between May 30, 2012, and Dec 30, 2013, 1224 patients in UNCOVER-2 were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous placebo (n=168), etanercept (n=358), or ixekizumab every 2 weeks (n=351) or every 4 weeks (n=347); between Aug 11, 2012, and Feb 27, 2014, 1346 patients in UNCOVER-3 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=193), etanercept (n=382), ixekizumab every 2 weeks (n=385), or ixekizumab every 4 weeks (n=386). At week 12, both primary endpoints were met in both studies. For UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 respectively, in the ixekizumab every 2 weeks group, PASI 75 was achieved by 315 (response rate 89·7%; effect size 87·4% (97·5% CI 82·9–91·8) vs placebo; 48·1% (41·2–55·0) vs etanercept) and 336 (87·3%; 80·0% (74·4–85·7) vs placebo; 33·9% (27·0–40·7) vs etanercept) patients; in the ixekizumab every 4 weeks group, by 269 (77·5%; 75·1% (69·5–80·8) vs placebo; 35·9% (28·2–43·6) vs etanercept) and 325 (84·2%; 76·9% (71·0–82·8) vs placebo; 30·8% (23·7–37·9) vs etanercept) patients; in the placebo group, by four (2·4%) and 14 (7·3%) patients; and in the etanercept group by 149 (41·6%) and 204 (53·4%) patients (all p<0·0001 vs placebo or etanercept). In the ixekizumab every 2 weeks group, sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 292 (response rate 83·2%; effect size 80·8% (97·5% CI 75·6–86·0) vs placebo; 47·2% (39·9–54·4) vs etanercept) and 310 (80·5%; 73·8% (67·7–79·9) vs placebo; 38·9% (31·7–46·1) vs etanercept) patients; in the ixekizumab every 4 weeks group by 253 (72·9%; 70·5% (64·6–76·5) vs placebo; 36·9% (29·1–44·7) vs etanercept) and 291 (75·4%; 68·7% (62·3–75·0) vs placebo; 33·8% (26·3–41·3) vs etanercept) patients; in the placebo group by four (2·4%) and 13 (6·7%) patients; and in the etanercept group by 129 (36·0%) and 159 (41·6%) patients (all p<0·0001 vs placebo or etanercept). In combined studies, serious adverse events were reported in 14 (1·9%) of 734 patients given ixekizumab every 2 weeks, 14 (1·9%) of 729 given ixekizumab every 4 weeks, seven (1·9%) of 360 given placebo, and 14 (1·9%) of 739 given etanercept; no deaths were noted. Interpretation Both ixekizumab dose regimens had greater efficacy than placebo and etanercept over 12 weeks in two independent studies. These studies show that selectively neutralising interleukin 17A with a high affinity antibody potentially gives patients with psoriasis a new and effective biological therapy option. Funding Eli Lilly and Co.
Two phase 3 trials (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3) showed that at 12 weeks of treatment, ixekizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-17A, was superior to placebo and etanercept in the treatment ...of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We report the 60-week data from the UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 trials, as well as 12-week and 60-week data from a third phase 3 trial, UNCOVER-1.
We randomly assigned 1296 patients in the UNCOVER-1 trial, 1224 patients in the UNCOVER-2 trial, and 1346 patients in the UNCOVER-3 trial to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (placebo group), 80 mg of ixekizumab every 2 weeks after a starting dose of 160 mg (2-wk dosing group), or 80 mg of ixekizumab every 4 weeks after a starting dose of 160 mg (4-wk dosing group). Additional cohorts in the UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 trials were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of etanercept twice weekly. At week 12 in the UNCOVER-3 trial, the patients entered a long-term extension period during which they received 80 mg of ixekizumab every 4 weeks through week 60; at week 12 in the UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 trials, the patients who had a response to ixekizumab (defined as a static Physicians Global Assessment sPGA score of 0 clear or 1 minimal psoriasis) were randomly reassigned to receive placebo, 80 mg of ixekizumab every 4 weeks, or 80 mg of ixekizumab every 12 weeks through week 60. Coprimary end points were the percentage of patients who had a score on the sPGA of 0 or 1 and a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 12.
In the UNCOVER-1 trial, at week 12, the patients had better responses to ixekizumab than to placebo; in the 2-wk dosing group, 81.8% had an sPGA score of 0 or 1 and 89.1% had a PASI 75 response; in the 4-wk dosing group, the respective rates were 76.4% and 82.6%; and in the placebo group, the rates were 3.2% and 3.9% (P<0.001 for all comparisons of ixekizumab with placebo). In the UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 trials, among the patients who were randomly reassigned at week 12 to receive 80 mg of ixekizumab every 4 weeks, 80 mg of ixekizumab every 12 weeks, or placebo, an sPGA score of 0 or 1 was maintained by 73.8%, 39.0%, and 7.0% of the patients, respectively. Patients in the UNCOVER-3 trial received continuous treatment of ixekizumab from weeks 0 through 60, and at week 60, at least 73% had an sPGA score of 0 or 1 and at least 80% had a PASI 75 response. Adverse events reported during ixekizumab use included neutropenia, candidal infections, and inflammatory bowel disease.
In three phase 3 trials involving patients with psoriasis, ixekizumab was effective through 60 weeks of treatment. As with any treatment, the benefits need to be weighed against the risks of adverse events. The efficacy and safety of ixekizumab beyond 60 weeks of treatment are not yet known. (Funded by Eli Lilly; UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, and UNCOVER-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT01474512, NCT01597245, and NCT01646177, respectively.).
Background In subjects with psoriasis, inflammation and epidermal hyperplasia are thought to be controlled by T cell–derived cytokines. Evidence suggests that the TH 17 cell cytokine IL-17A (IL-17) ...might play a role in disease pathogenesis. Objective We sought to understand the effect that neutralization of IL-17 has on the clinical features of psoriasis and to understand the role that IL-17 has in inflammatory pathways underlying psoriasis in human subjects. Methods We examined skin lesions obtained from 40 subjects participating in a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the anti–IL-17 mAb ixekizumab (previously LY2439821) in which subjects received 5, 15, 50, or 150 mg of subcutaneous ixekizumab or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Results There were significant dose-dependent reductions from baseline in keratinocyte proliferation, hyperplasia, epidermal thickness, infiltration into the dermis and epidermis by T cells and dendritic cells, and keratinocyte expression of innate defense peptides at 2 weeks. By week 6, the skin appeared normal. Quantitative RT-PCR and microarrays revealed an ablation of the disease-defining mRNA expression profile by 2 weeks after the first dose of study drug. The effect of IL-17 blockade on expression of genes synergistically regulated by IL-17 and TNF-α was of higher magnitude at 2 weeks than in prior studies with TNF-α antagonism. Conclusion Our data suggest that IL-17 is a key “driver” cytokine that activates pathogenic inflammation in subjects with psoriasis. Neutralizing IL-17 with ixekizumab might be a successful therapeutic strategy in psoriasis.
Psoriasis, a chronic, immune‐mediated skin disease characterized by red, scaly plaques, affects approximately 0.3% of the population in Japan. The aim of this open‐label study was to evaluate the ...long‐term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab, a humanized, anti‐interleukin‐17A monoclonal antibody, in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (n = 78, including 11 psoriatic arthritis), erythrodermic psoriasis (n = 8) and generalized pustular psoriasis (n = 5). Ixekizumab was administrated s.c. at baseline (week 0, 160 mg), from weeks 2 to 12 (80 mg every 2 weeks), and from weeks 16 to 52 (80 mg every 4 weeks). At week 52, 92.3% of patients with plaque psoriasis achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 80.8% achieved PASI 90, 48.7% achieved PASI 100, and 52.6% had remission of plaques (by static Physician Global Assessment, sPGA 0). Difficult to treat areas of psoriasis (nail or scalp) also responded to ixekizumab. All patients with psoriatic arthritis who were assessed (5/5) achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Most patients with erythrodermic psoriasis or generalized pustular psoriasis responded to ixekizumab and the clinical outcome was maintained over 52 weeks (75% and 60% of patients achieved sPGA 0, 1 at week 52, respectively). Mostly mild or moderate treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported by 79 of 91 patients; the most common were nasopharyngitis, eczema, seborrheic dermatitis, urticaria and injection site reactions. In conclusion, 52‐week ixekizumab treatment was efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis. Efficacy was also observed in patients with erythrodermic psoriasis, generalized pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
Background Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis demonstrated positive responses to ixekizumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in a phase-II, randomized, placebo-controlled ...trial. Objective We sought to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab. Methods After receiving 10, 25, 75, or 150 mg of ixekizumab or placebo during randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with less than 75% improvement from baseline on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI75) entered open-label extension (OLE); patients with PASI75 or higher entered a treatment-free period (weeks 20-32), then entered OLE after meeting response criteria. During OLE, patients received 120 mg of subcutaneous ixekizumab every 4 weeks. Results In all, 120 patients entered OLE; 103 completed 52 weeks or more of treatment. Overall, 77% of patients achieved PASI75 at week 52 (nonresponder imputation). Patients who responded to treatment in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial maintained a high-level response by week 52 of OLE (PASI75 = 95%; 90% improvement from baseline on the PASI score = 94%; 100% improvement from baseline on the PASI score = 82%). Irrespective of dose in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial, each group had similar response rates at week 52 of OLE. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate for adverse events was 0.47 and for serious adverse events was 0.06 per patient-year during OLE. Limitations No control group, small sample sizes, and bias toward retention of patients with positive responses limit interpretation. Conclusion A high proportion of patients responded to ixekizumab therapy and maintained clinical responses over 1 year of treatment with no unexpected safety signals.
Objective
To evaluate ixekizumab, an anti–interleukin‐17A (anti–IL‐17A) monoclonal antibody, in 2 populations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients: biologics‐naive patients and patients with an ...inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.
Methods
In this phase II, randomized, double‐blind study, placebo or ixekizumab was administered subcutaneously to 260 biologics‐naive patients and 188 patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 with concomitant disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs. The primary objective was to determine the dose‐response relationship of ixekizumab as measured by the proportion of biologics‐naive patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 12.
Results
Using a logistic regression model defined a priori, a statistically significant dose‐response relationship as measured by ACR20 response rates at week 12 was detected in biologics‐naive patients (P = 0.031). For patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors, ACR20 responses at week 12 were significantly better with ixekizumab than placebo (P < 0.05). Decreases in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and CRP level from baseline were observed at week 12 in the ixekizumab groups in both populations (P < 0.05 versus placebo). Onset of action was rapid in some dose groups in both populations, with improvements in the ACR20, DAS28‐CRP, CRP levels, and CDAI observed by day 3 (P < 0.05). Adverse events occurred with similar frequencies overall in the ixekizumab and placebo groups. Infections were more frequent with ixekizumab than placebo (biologics‐naive 25% versus 19%; inadequate responders to TNF inhibitors 27% versus 25%). No mycobacterial or invasive fungal infections were reported.
Conclusion
Ixekizumab improved RA signs and symptoms in RA patients who were either naive to biologics treatment or had an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. The safety profile was similar to that of other biologic agents, with no unexpected safety concerns.
Weight gain and weight loss are associated with changes in blood pressure through unknown mechanisms. Central melanocortinergic signaling is implicated in the control of energy balance and blood ...pressure in rodents, but there is no information regarding such an association with blood pressure in humans.
We assessed blood pressure, heart rate, and urinary catecholamines in overweight or obese subjects with a loss-of-function mutation in MC4R, the gene encoding the melanocortin 4 receptor, and in equally overweight control subjects. We also examined the effects of an MC4R agonist administered for 7 days in 28 overweight or obese volunteers.
The prevalence of hypertension was markedly lower in the MC4R-deficient subjects than in the control subjects (24% vs. 53%, P=0.009). After the exclusion of subjects taking antihypertensive medications, blood-pressure levels were significantly lower in MC4R-deficient subjects than in control subjects, with mean (+/-SE) systolic blood pressures of 123+/-14 mm Hg and 131+/-12 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.02), and mean diastolic blood pressures of 73+/-10 mm Hg and 79+/-7 mm Hg, respectively (P=0.03). As compared with control subjects, MC4R-deficient subjects had a lower increase in heart rate on waking (P=0.007), a lower heart rate during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (P<0.001), and lower 24-hour urinary norepinephrine excretion (P=0.04). The maximum tolerated daily dose of 1.0 mg of the MC4R agonist led to significant increases of 9.3+/-1.9 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure and of 6.6+/-1.1 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure (P<0.001 for both comparisons) at 24 hours, as compared with placebo. Differences in blood pressure were not explained by changes in insulin levels; there were no significant adverse events.
Results of our genetic and pharmacologic studies implicate melanocortinergic signaling in the control of human blood pressure through an insulin-independent mechanism.
The present study describes a subgroup analysis of 33 Japanese patients participating in UNCOVER‐1, an international, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 study of ixekizumab in patients with ...moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Patients were randomized to a placebo (n = 13) or ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 (IXEQ4W, n = 12) or 2 (IXEQ2W, n = 8) weeks, from week 0–12. At week 12, ixekizumab‐treated patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score 0 or 1 (sPGA 0,1; n = 16) were re‐randomized to a placebo (n = 6), ixekizumab 80 mg every 12 (IXEQ12W, n = 5) or 4 (IXEQ4W, n = 5) weeks, from week 12–60. At week 12, more ixekizumab‐treated versus placebo‐treated patients achieved sPGA (0,1) (≥66.7% vs 0%), ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (≥75% vs 0%), and sPGA (0) or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (both ≥33.3% vs 0%), with improved symptoms and quality of life. At week 60, 100% (IXEQ4W), 40.0% (IXEQ12W) and 16.7% (placebo) had maintained sPGA (0,1). From week 0–12, treatment‐emergent adverse events were 76.9% (placebo), 75.0% (IXEQ4W) and 87.5% (IXEQ2W), and from week 12–60 were 66.7% (placebo) and 100% (IXEQ12W, IXEQ4W). Ixekizumab‐treated patients had no severe treatment‐emergent adverse events, and one serious TEAE (IXEQ4W); infection was the most frequent treatment‐emergent adverse event. In conclusion, ixekizumab for 60 weeks was effective and safe for Japanese patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis, in line with the overall findings from UNCOVER‐1.
“Between Representations” is an attempt to think the nature of the crisis of the university by re-engaging with the thought of Bill Readings and George Grant. The discussion is situated in the ...context of a more general crisis of representation manifest in recent attempts to celebrate Canada’s coming 150 years since Confederation. While the essay begins with an indication of the continuity of Readings’s with Grant’s argument, it focuses on Grant’s argument that the university today works to legitimate the techno-capitalist society of which it is a part and develops his suggestion that this is most significant in the context of the humanities and social sciences where it is least apparent. In developing Grant’s argument, the essay turns to questions of pedagogy and in particular the meaning and mode of engaging with “theory”. In considering the nature of theory, the paper suggests one possible mode of engaging with the crisis of representation that centres on work conducted in the classroom.
Although Nova Scotia nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have been working on local food security for many years, there is limited research that has analyzed their activities and impacts. Employing ...the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' (FAO) four dimensions of food security—food availability, food access, food utilization, and food stability—to guide data collection and analysis, we examined the work of nine Nova Scotia NGOs through document analysis, media analysis, and interviews with NGO representatives. We categorized the findings according to two broad themes of raising community awareness and conducting research/policy advocacy, and two more focused themes of partnerships and funding. We then discussed the rich array of food security “orientations” throughout the province, spanning community food security, household food insecurity, food justice, food sovereignty, and policy work. We found that the FAO’s four criteria, based as they are on larger scales (e.g., the national level), could not easily capture the myriad community-level food security work in Nova Scotia. We did note, however, that at the subnational level, indicators point to the continued dominance of the agri-food system in the province. We suggest that the relations forged by the food security NGOs with local universities and civic organizations could be reinvigorated in the post-COVID era with longer-term, joined-up sustainable food policy approaches coupled with institutional mapping of key actors.
PDF
