Acetaminophen-protein adducts are specific biomarkers of toxic acetaminophen (paracetamol) metabolite exposure. In patients with hepatotoxicity (alanine aminotransferase ALT >1,000 U/L), an adduct ...concentration ≥1.0 nmol/ml is sensitive and specific for identifying cases secondary to acetaminophen. Our aim was to characterise acetaminophen-protein adduct concentrations in patients following acetaminophen overdose and determine if they predict toxicity.
We performed a multicentre prospective observational study, recruiting patients 14 years of age or older with acetaminophen overdose regardless of intent or formulation. Three serum samples were obtained within the first 24 h of presentation and analysed for acetaminophen-protein adducts. Acetaminophen-protein adduct concentrations were compared to ALT and other indicators of toxicity.
Of the 240 patients who participated, 204 (85%) presented following acute ingestions, with a median ingested dose of 20 g (IQR 10–40), and 228 (95%) were treated with intravenous acetylcysteine at a median time of 6 h (IQR 3.5–10.5) post-ingestion. Thirty-six (15%) patients developed hepatotoxicity, of whom 22 had an ALT ≤1,000 U/L at the time of initial acetaminophen-protein adduct measurement. Those who developed hepatotoxicity had a higher initial acetaminophen-protein adduct concentration compared to those who did not, 1.63 nmol/ml (IQR 0.76–2.02, n = 22) vs. 0.26 nmol/ml (IQR 0.15–0.41; n = 204; p <0.0001), respectively. The AUROC for hepatotoxicity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96–1.00; n = 226; p <0.0001) with acetaminophen-protein adduct concentration and 0.89 (95% CI 0.82–0.96; n = 219; p <0.0001) with ALT. An acetaminophen-protein adduct concentration of 0.58 nmol/ml was 100% sensitive and 91% specific for identifying patients with an initial ALT ≤1,000 U/L who would develop hepatotoxicity. Adding acetaminophen-protein adduct concentrations to risk prediction models improved prediction of hepatotoxicity to a level similar to that obtained by more complex models.
Acetaminophen-protein adduct concentration on presentation predicted which patients with acetaminophen overdose subsequently developed hepatotoxicity, regardless of time of ingestion. An adduct threshold of 0.58 nmol/L was required for optimal prediction.
Acetaminophen poisoning is one of the most common causes of liver injury. This study examined a new biomarker of acetaminophen toxicity, which measures the amount of toxic metabolite exposure called acetaminophen-protein adduct. We found that those who developed liver injury had a higher initial level of acetaminophen-protein adducts than those who did not.
Australian Toxicology Monitoring (ATOM) Study–Australian Paracetamol Project: ACTRN12612001240831 (ANZCTR) Date of registration: 23/11/2012.
Display omitted
•APAP-protein adducts represent NAPQI (toxic metabolite) bound to cellular proteins•They are higher at presentation in those who develop liver injury even when ALT is normal.•APAP-protein adducts may be an early biomarker to predict hepatotoxicity after APAP overdose.
Pharmacological treatment of cardiac glycoside poisoning Roberts, Darren M.; Gallapatthy, Gamini; Dunuwille, Asunga ...
BJCP. British journal of clinical pharmacology/British journal of clinical pharmacology,
March 2016, Letnik:
81, Številka:
3
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Cardiac glycosides are an important cause of poisoning, reflecting their widespread clinical usage and presence in natural sources. Poisoning can manifest as varying degrees of toxicity. Predominant ...clinical features include gastrointestinal signs, bradycardia and heart block. Death occurs from ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. A wide range of treatments have been used, the more common including activated charcoal, atropine, β‐adrenoceptor agonists, temporary pacing, anti‐digoxin Fab and magnesium, and more novel agents include fructose‐1,6‐diphosphate (clinical trial in progress) and anticalin. However, even in the case of those treatments that have been in use for decades, there is debate regarding their efficacy, the indications and dosage that optimizes outcomes. This contributes to variability in use across the world. Another factor influencing usage is access. Barriers to access include the requirement for transfer to a specialized centre (for example, to receive temporary pacing) or financial resources (for example, anti‐digoxin Fab in resource poor countries). Recent data suggest that existing methods for calculating the dose of anti‐digoxin Fab in digoxin poisoning overstate the dose required, and that its efficacy may be minimal in patients with chronic digoxin poisoning. Cheaper and effective medicines are required, in particular for the treatment of yellow oleander poisoning which is problematic in resource poor countries.
Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is advocated for the treatment of sodium channel blocker poisoning, but its efficacy varies amongst different sodium channel blockers. This Commentary addresses common ...pitfalls and appropriate usage of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate therapy in cardiotoxic drug poisonings.
Serum alkalinization is best achieved by the synergistic effect of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate and hyperventilation (PCO
∼ 30-35 mmHg 0.47-0.6 kPa). This reduces the dose of sodium bicarbonate required to achieve serum alkalinization (pH ∼ 7.45-7.55) and avoids adverse effects from excessive doses of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate.
Tricyclic antidepressant poisoning responds well to sodium bicarbonate therapy, but many other sodium channel blockers may not. For instance, drugs that block the intercellular gap junctions, such as bupropion, do not respond well to alkalinization. For sodium channel blocker poisonings in which the expected response is unknown, a bolus of 1-2 mmol/kg sodium bicarbonate can be used to assess the response to alkalinization.
Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate can cause electrolyte abnormalities such as hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia, leading to QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in poisonings with drugs that have mixed sodium and potassium cardiac channel properties, such as hydroxychloroquine and flecainide.
Excessive doses of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate commonly occur if it is administered until the QRS complex duration is < 100 ms. A prolonged QRS complex duration is not specific for sodium channel blocker toxicity. Some sodium channel blockers do not respond, and even when there is a response, it takes a few hours for the QRS complex duration to return completely to normal. In addition, QRS complex prolongation can be due to a rate-dependent bundle branch block. So, no further doses should be given after achieving serum alkalinization (pH ∼ 7.45-7.55).
A further strategy to avoid overdosing patients with hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is to set maximum doses. Exceeding 6 mmol/kg is likely to cause hypernatremia, fluid overload, metabolic alkalosis, and cerebral oedema in many patients and potentially be lethal.
We propose that hypertonic sodium bicarbonate therapy be used in patients with sodium channel blocker poisoning who have clinically significant toxicities such as seizures, shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg) or ventricular dysrhythmia. We recommend initial bolus dosing of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate of 1-2 mmol/kg, which can be repeated if the patient remains unstable, up to a maximum dose of 6 mmol/kg. This is recommended to be administered in conjunction with mechanical ventilation and hyperventilation to achieve serum alkalinization (PCO
∼30-35 mmHg 4-4.7 kPa) and a pH of ∼7.45-7.55. With repeated bolus doses of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate, it is imperative to monitor and correct potassium and sodium abnormalities and observe changes in serum pH and on the electrocardiogram.
Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is an effective antidote for certain sodium channel blocker poisonings, such as tricyclic antidepressants, and when used in appropriate dosing, it works synergistically with hyperventilation to achieve serum alkalinization and to reduce sodium channel blockade. However, there are many pitfalls that can lead to excessive sodium bicarbonate therapy and severe adverse effects.
Context: Paracetamol is commonly taken in overdose, with increasing concerns that those taking "massive" overdoses have higher rates of hepatotoxicity and may require higher doses of acetylcysteine. ...The objective was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of "massive" (≥ 40 g) paracetamol overdoses.
Methods: Patients were identified through the Australian Paracetamol Project, a prospective observational study through Poisons Information Centres in NSW and Queensland, over 3 and 1.5 years, respectively, and retrospectively from three clinical toxicology unit databases (over 2.5 to 20 years). Included were immediate-release paracetamol overdoses ≥ 40 g ingested over ≤ 8 h. Outcomes measured included paracetamol ratiodefined as the ratio of the first paracetamol concentration taken 4-16 h post-ingestion to the standard (150 mg/L at 4 h) nomogram line at that time and hepatotoxicity (ALT >1000 U/L).
Results: Two hundred paracetamol overdoses were analysed, reported median dose ingested was 50 g (interquartile range (IQR): 45-60 g) and median paracetamol ratio 1.9 (IQR: 1.4-2.9, n = 173). One hundred and ninety-three received acetylcysteine at median time of 6.3 h (IQR: 4-9.3 h) post-ingestion. Twenty-eight (14%) developed hepatotoxicity, including six treated within 8 h of ingestion. Activated charcoal was administered to 49(25%), at median of 2 h post-ingestion (IQR:1.5-5 h). Those receiving activated charcoal (within 4 h of ingestion), had significantly lower paracetamol ratio versus those who did not: 1.4 (n = 33, IQR: 1.1-1.6) versus 2.2 (n = 140, IQR: 1.5-3.0) (p < .0001) (paracetamol concentration measured ≥ 1 h after charcoal). Furthermore, they had lower rates of hepatotoxicity unadjusted OR: 0.12 (95% CI: <0.001-0.91); adjusted for time to acetylcysteine OR: 0.20 (95%CI: 0.002-1.74).
Seventy-nine had a paracetamol ratio ≥2, 43 received an increased dose of acetylcysteine in the first 21 h; most commonly a double dose in the last bag (100 to 200 mg/kg/16 h). Those receiving increased acetylcysteine had a significant decrease risk of hepatotoxicity OR:0.27 (95% CI: 0.08-0.94). The OR remained similar after adjustment for time to acetylcysteine and paracetamol ratio.
Conclusion: Massive paracetamol overdose can result in hepatotoxicity despite early treatment. Paracetamol concentrations were markedly reduced in those receiving activated charcoal within 4 h. In those with high paracetamol concentrations, treatment with increased acetylcysteine dose within 21 h was associated with a significant reduction in hepatotoxicity.
Methotrexate (MTX) toxicity varies depending on factors such as dosing frequency (acute or repeated), dosage (low or high) and the administration route (oral, parenteral or intrathecal). Renal ...impairment can trigger or exacerbate MTX toxicity. Acute oral low-dose MTX (LDMTX) overdoses seldom lead to toxicity due to the saturable maximal bioavailable dose, but toxicity risks increase with repeated low doses (>3 days), high-dose MTX (HDMTX) or intrathecal poisoning. Folinic acid shares MTX transporters in the gut and cells and bypasses the MTX-induced dihydrofolate reductase inhibition. The required folinic acid dosage differs for low-dose and high-dose MTX toxicities. Acute LDMTX poisoning rarely requires folinic acid, while chronic LDMTX poisoning needs low-dose folinic acid until cellular function is restored. In HDMTX toxicities, early intravenous folinic acid administration is recommended, with dose and duration being guided by MTX concentrations and clinical improvement. In intrathecal MTX poisoning, folinic acid should be administered intravenously. Glucarpidase, a recombinant bacterial enzyme, has a high affinity for MTX and folate analogues in the intravascular or intrathecal systems. It decreases serum MTX concentrations by 90%-95% within 15 min. Its primary indication is for intrathecal MTX poisoning. It is rarely indicated in HDMTX toxicity unless patients have renal injury. However, there is no literature evidence supporting its use in HDMTX poisoning. Its use is limited by its significant cost and lack of availability. Haemodialysis can be potentially useful for MTX removal in cases where glucarpidase is not available. Additionally, fluid hydration, renal support and urine alkalinization are important adjunctive therapies for managing MTX toxicities.Methotrexate (MTX) toxicity varies depending on factors such as dosing frequency (acute or repeated), dosage (low or high) and the administration route (oral, parenteral or intrathecal). Renal impairment can trigger or exacerbate MTX toxicity. Acute oral low-dose MTX (LDMTX) overdoses seldom lead to toxicity due to the saturable maximal bioavailable dose, but toxicity risks increase with repeated low doses (>3 days), high-dose MTX (HDMTX) or intrathecal poisoning. Folinic acid shares MTX transporters in the gut and cells and bypasses the MTX-induced dihydrofolate reductase inhibition. The required folinic acid dosage differs for low-dose and high-dose MTX toxicities. Acute LDMTX poisoning rarely requires folinic acid, while chronic LDMTX poisoning needs low-dose folinic acid until cellular function is restored. In HDMTX toxicities, early intravenous folinic acid administration is recommended, with dose and duration being guided by MTX concentrations and clinical improvement. In intrathecal MTX poisoning, folinic acid should be administered intravenously. Glucarpidase, a recombinant bacterial enzyme, has a high affinity for MTX and folate analogues in the intravascular or intrathecal systems. It decreases serum MTX concentrations by 90%-95% within 15 min. Its primary indication is for intrathecal MTX poisoning. It is rarely indicated in HDMTX toxicity unless patients have renal injury. However, there is no literature evidence supporting its use in HDMTX poisoning. Its use is limited by its significant cost and lack of availability. Haemodialysis can be potentially useful for MTX removal in cases where glucarpidase is not available. Additionally, fluid hydration, renal support and urine alkalinization are important adjunctive therapies for managing MTX toxicities.
Olanzapine pamoate is an intramuscular depot injection for the treatment of schizophrenia. Approximately 1.4% of patients develop a serious adverse event called post‐injection delirium/sedation ...syndrome (PDSS), characterised by drowsiness, anticholinergic and extrapyramidal symptoms. The objective is to investigate olanzapine PDSS presentations including clinical features and treatment approach. This is a retrospective review of olanzapine PDSS patients from three toxicology units and the NSW Poisons Information Centre between 2017 and 2022. Adult patients were included if they had intramuscular olanzapine then developed PDSS criteria. Clinical symptoms, treatment, timing and length of symptoms were extracted into a preformatted Excel database. There were 18 patients included in the series, with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range IQR: 38–58) and male predominance (89%). Median onset time post injection was 30 min (IQR: 11–38). PDSS symptoms predominate with drowsiness, confusion and dysarthria. Median length of symptoms was 24 h (IQR: 20–54). Most common treatment included supportive care without any pharmacological intervention (n = 10), benzodiazepine (n = 4) and benztropine (n = 3). In one case, bromocriptine and physostigmine followed by oral rivastigmine were given to manage antidopaminergic and anticholinergic symptoms respectively. This proposed treatment combination could potentially alleviate some of the symptoms but needs further studies to validate the findings. In conclusion, this case series supports the characterisation of PDSS symptomology predominantly being anticholinergic with similar onset (<1 h) and duration (<72 h). Bromocriptine is proposed to manage PDSS if patients develop severe dopamine blockade and physostigmine followed by rivastigmine for anticholinergic delirium.
Genomic analyses of cancer have identified recurrent point mutations in the RNA splicing factor-encoding genes SF3B1, U2AF1, and SRSF2 that confer an alteration of function. Cancer cells bearing ...these mutations are preferentially dependent on wild-type (WT) spliceosome function, but clinically relevant means to therapeutically target the spliceosome do not currently exist. Here we describe an orally available modulator of the SF3b complex, H3B-8800, which potently and preferentially kills spliceosome-mutant epithelial and hematologic tumor cells. These killing effects of H3B-8800 are due to its direct interaction with the SF3b complex, as evidenced by loss of H3B-8800 activity in drug-resistant cells bearing mutations in genes encoding SF3b components. Although H3B-8800 modulates WT and mutant spliceosome activity, the preferential killing of spliceosome-mutant cells is due to retention of short, GC-rich introns, which are enriched for genes encoding spliceosome components. These data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of splicing modulation in spliceosome-mutant cancers.
PDF
